MHC-mediated spatial distribution in brown trout (Salmo trutta) fry

Heredity

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 403-409

  O'Farrell, B ^a   Benzie, J A H ^a   McGinnity, P ^a,b   Carlsson, J ^a   De Eyto, E ^b   Dillane, E ^a   Graham, C ^a   Coughlan, J ^a   Cross, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b MARINE INSTITUTE   (Ireland)

Author keywords

brown trout; kin association; MHC

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; DISPERSAL; EMERGENCE; GENETIC MARKER; KINSHIP; LABORATORY METHOD; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT; SALMONID; SIBLING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WILD POPULATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHY; GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; TROUT;

ANIMALS; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, MHC CLASS I; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TROUT;

SALMO TRUTTA;

EID: 84858864217     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.87     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Agbali M, Reichard M, Bryjova A, Bryja J, Smith C (2010). Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution 64: 1683-1696.
2. Altmann J, Alberts SC, Haines SA, Dubach J, Muruthi P, Coote T et al. (1996). Behavior predicts genes structure in a wild primate group. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5797-5801.
3. Aoyagi K, Dijkstra JM, Xia C, Denda I, Ototake M, Hashimoto K et al. (2002). Classical MHC class I genes composed of highly divergent sequence lineages share a single locus in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Immunol 168: 260-273.
4. Barnard CJ, Hurst JL, Aldhous P (1991). Of mice and kin: The functional significance of kin bias in social behaviour. Biol Rev 66: 379-430.
5. Bernatchez L, Landry C (2003). MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: What have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J Evol Biol 16: 363-377.
6. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1981). Genetic control for sibling recognition? Nature 290: 246-248.
7. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1982). Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: Maternal and paternal effects. Animal Behav 30: 1151-1157.
8. Boehm T, Zufall F (2006). MHC peptides and the sensory evaluation of genotype. Trends Neurosci 29: 100-107.
9. Boyd SK, Blaustein AR (1985). Familiarity and inbreeding avoidance in the gray-tailed vole (Microtus canicaudus). J Mammal 66: 348-352.
10. Brown G, Brown J (1992). Do rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon discriminate kin? Can J Zool 70: 1636-1640.
11. Brown G, Brown J (1993). Social dynamics in salmonid fishes: Do kin make better neighbors? Animal Behav 45: 863-871.
12. Brown GE, Brown JA (1996). Does kin-biased territorial behavior increase kin-biased foraging in juvenile salmonids? Behav Ecol 7: 24-29.
13. Brown RE, Singh PB, Roser B (1987). The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats. Physiol Behav 40: 65-73.
14. Burnard D, Gozlan RE, Griffiths SW (2008). The role of pheromones in freshwater fishes. J Fish Biol 73: 1-16.
15. Carlsson J, Carlsson JEL, Olsen KH, Hansen MM, Eriksson T, Nilsson J (2003). Kin-biased distribution in brown trout: An effect of redd location or kin recognition? Heredity 92: 53-60.
16. Carlsson J, Olsen KH, Nilsson J, Overli O, Stabell OB (1999). Microsatellites reveal fine-scale genetic structure in stream-living brown trout. J Fish Biol 55: 1290-1303.
17. Chaix R, Cao C, Donnelly P (2008). Is mate choice in humans MHC-dependent? PLoS Genet 4: E1000184.
18. Consuegra S, De EE, Mcginnity P, Stet RJ, Jordan WC (2011). Contrasting responses to selection in class I and class IIalpha major histocompatibility- linked markers in salmon. Heredity 107: 143-154.
19. Consuegra S, Garcia De LC (2008). MHC-mediated mate choice increases parasite resistance in salmon. Proc Biol Sci 275: 1397-1403.
20. Coughlan J, Mcginnity P, O'Farrell B, Dillane E, Diserud O, De Eyto E et al. (2006). Temporal variation in an immune response gene (MHC I) in anadromous Salmo trutta in an Irish river before and during aquaculture activities. ICES J Marine Sci 63: 1248-1255.
21. Dawkins R (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
22. De Eyto E, Mcginnity P, Consuegra S, Coughlan J, Tufto J, Farrell K et al. (2007). Natural selection acts on Atlantic salmon major histocompatibility (MH) variability in the wild. Proc Biol Sci 274: 861-869.
23. De Ruiter JR, Geffen E (1998). Relatedness of matrilines, dispersing males and social groups in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Proc Roy Soc London Ser B-Biol Sci 265: 79-87.
24. Dewsbury DA (1982). Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice. Biol Behav 7: 157-168.
25. Dineen G, Harrison SSC, Giller PS (2007). Growth, production and bioenergetics of brown trout in upland streams with contrasting riparian vegetation. Freshwater Biol 52: 771-783.
26. Eizaguirre C, Yeates SE, Lenz TL, Kalbe M, Milinski M (2009). MHC-based mate choice combines good genes and maintenance of MHC polymorphism. Mol Ecol 18: 3316-3329.
27. Elliot JM (1994). Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
28. Elliot J (1987). The distances travelled by downstream-moving trout fry, Salmo trutta, in a lake district stream. Freshwater Biol 17: 491-499.
29. Estoup A, Presa P, Krieg F, Vaiman D, Guyomard R (1993). (Ct)(N) and (Gt)(N) Microsatellites-A new class of genetic markers for Salmo trutta L brown trout. Heredity 71: 488-496.
30. Forsberg LA, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Grahn M (2007). Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout-females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. J Evol Biol 20: 1859-1869.
31. Frederickson WT, Sackett GP (1984). Kin preferences in primates: Relatedness or familiarity? J Comp Psychol 98: 29-34.
32. Gavish L, Hoffman JE, Getz LL (1984). Sibling recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behav 32: 362-366.
33. Gerlach G, Hodgins-Davis A, Avolio C, Schunter C (2008). Kin recognition in zebrafish: A 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting. Proc Biol Sci 275: 2165-2170.
34. Gowan C, Young MK, Fausch KD, Riley SC (1994). Restricted movement in resident stream salmonids: A paradigm lost? Can J Fisheries Aquat Sci 51: 2626-2637.
35. Grafen A (1990). Do animals really recognize kin? Animal Behav 39: 42-54.
36. Grau JH (1982). Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus). Animal Behav 30: 497-505.
37. Grimholt U, Drablos F, Jorgensen SM, Hoyheim B, Stet RJM (2002). The major histocompatibility class I locus in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L): Polymorphism, linkage analysis and protein modelling. Immunogenetics 54: 570-581.
38. Halpin ZT (1991). Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp 220-258.
39. Halpin ZT, Hoffman MD (1987). Sibling recognition in the white-footed mouse, Permoyscus leucopus: Association or phenotype matching? Animal Behav 35: 563-570.
40. Hamilton W (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7: 1-52.
41. Hansen MM, Nielsen EE, Mensberg K-LD (1997). The problem of sampling families rather than populations: Relatedness among individuals in samples of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) Mol Ecol 6: 469-474.
42. Hansen M, Skaala O, Jensen L, Bekkevold D, Mensberg K-L (2007). Gene flow, effective population size and selection at major histocompatibility complex genes: Brown trout in the Hardanger Fjord, Norway. Mol Ecol 16: 1413-1425.
43. Harris RN, Vess TJ, Hammond JI, Lindermuth CJ (2003). Context-dependent kin discrimination in larval four-toed salamanders Hemidactylium scutatum. Herpetologica 59: 164-177.
44. Hedenskog M, Petersson E, Järvi T (2002). Agonistic behavior and growth in newly emerged brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) of sea-ranched and wild origin. Aggressive Behav 28: 145-153.
45. Hepper PG (1991). Recognizing kin: Ontogeny and classification. In: Hepper PG (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
46. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22: 491-517.
47. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983). Kin recognition in animals. Am Scient 71: 46-55.
48. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003). Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 12: 2511-2523.
49. Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML (2006). ML-RELATE: A computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 576-579.
50. Keller L, Ross KG (1998). Selfish genes: A green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394: 573-575.
51. Kurtz J, Kalbe M, Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Wegner KM, Reusch TB et al. (2004). Major histocompatibility complex diversity influences parasite resistance and innate immunity in sticklebacks. Proc Biol Sci 271: 197-204.
52. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999). Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 1753-1766.
53. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK (1992). Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360: 581-583.
54. Milinski M, Griffiths S, Wegner KM, Reusch TB, Haas-Assenbaum A, Boehm T (2005). Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 4414-4418.
55. Milinski M, Griffiths SW, Reusch TB, Boehm T (2010). Costly major histocompatibility complex signals produced only by reproductively active males, but not females, must be validated by a 'maleness signal' in three-spined sticklebacks. Proc Biol Sci 277: 391-398.
56. Miller HC, Moore JA, Nelson NJ, Daugherty CH (2009). Influence of major histocompatibility complex genotype on mating success in a free-ranging reptile population. Proc Biol Sci 276: 1695-1704.
57. Muirhead CA (2001). Consequences of population structure on genes under balancing selection. Evolution 55: 1532-1541.
58. Neff B, Garner S, Heath J, Heath D (2008). The MHC and non-random mating in a captive population of Chinook salmon. Heredity 101: 175-185.
59. O'Brien SJ, Evermann JF (1988). Interactive influence of infectious disease and genetic diversity in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 254-259.
60. O'Hara RK, Blaustein AR (1982). Kin preference behavior in Bufo boreas tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11: 43-49.
61. O'Reilly PT, Hamilton LC, Mcconnell SK, Wright JM (1996). Rapid analysis of genetic variation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by PCR multiplexing of dinucleotide and tetranucleotide microsatellites. Can J Fisheries Aquat Sci 53: 2292-2298.
62. Ober C, Weitkamp L, Cox N, Dytch H, Kostyu D, Elias S (1997). HLA and mate choice in humans. Genetics 61: 497-504.
63. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J (2002). Influence of MHC on sibling discrimination in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. J Chem Ecol 28: 783-795.
64. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J, Langefors A (1998). MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. Animal Behav 56: 319-327.
65. Olsen KH (1989). Sibling recognition in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.) J Fish Biol 34: 571-581.
66. Paterson S, Piertney SB, Knox D, Gilbey J, Verspoor E (2004). Characterization and PCR multiplexing of novel highly variable tetranucleotide Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) microsatellites. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 160-162.
67. Porter RH, Tepper VJ, White DM (1981). Experiential influences on the development of huddling preferences and sibling recognition in spiny mice. Devel Psychobiol 14: 375-382.
68. Presa P, Guyomard R (1996). Conservation of microsatellites in three species of salmonids. J Fish Biol 49: 1326-1329.
69. Quinn T, Busack C (1985). Chemosensory recognition of siblings in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Animal Behav 33: 51-56.
70. Quinn T, Hara T (1986). Sibling recognition and olfactory sensitivity in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Zoo 64: 921-925.
71. Rajakaruna J, Brown A, Kaukinen K, Miller K (2006). Major histocompatibility complex and kin discrimination in Atlantic salmon and brook trout. Mol Ecol 15: 4569-4575.
72. Reusch TB, Haberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M (2001). Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414: 300-302.
73. Sanchez JA, Clabby C, Ramos D, Blanco G, Flavin F, Vazquez E et al. (1996). Protein and microsatellite single locus variability in Salmo salar L. (Atlantic salmon). Heredity 77: 423-432.
74. Schwacke L, Rosel P (2005). Relatedness Estimation and Rarefaction Analysis Tool (RERAT). http://people.musc.edu/Bschwaclh/.Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
75. Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985). Kin recognition: Issues and evidence. Forstschr Zool 31: 437-460.
76. Shum BP, Guethlein L, Flodin LR, Adkison MA, Hedrick RP, Nehring RB et al. (2001). Modes of salmonid MHC class I and II evolution differ from the primate paradigm. J Immunol 166: 3297-3308.
77. Slettan A, Olsaker I, Lie O (1995). Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, microsatellites at the Ssosl25, Ssosl85, Ssosl311, Ssosl417 loci. Animal Genet 26: 281-282.
78. Smukalla S, Caldara M, Pochet N, Beauvais A, Guadagnini S, Yan C et al. (2008). FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135: 726-737.
79. Stet RJM, De Vries B, Mudde K, Hermsen T, Van Heerwaarden J, Shum BP et al. (2002). Unique haplotypes of co-segregating major histocompatibility class II A and class II B alleles in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) give rise to diverse class II genotypes. Immunogenetics 54: 320-331.
80. Turner SM, Chaves-Campos J, Dewoody JA (2009). Parental relatedness and major histocompatibility effects on early embryo survivorship in Atlantic salmon. Genetica 137: 99-109.
81. Vera M, Sanz N, Hansen MM, Almodovar A, Garcia-Marin JL (2010). Population and family structure of brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a Mediterranean stream. Marine Freshwater Res 61: 676-685.
82. Waldman B (1981). Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: The role of experience. Z Tierpsychol 56: 341-358.
83. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke A (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B-Biol Sci 260: 755-760.
84. Yamazaki K, Boyse E, Mike V (1976). Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 144: 1324-1335.