Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with mhc dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (rhodeus ocellatus)

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1683-1696

  Agbali, Muna ^a   Reichard, Martin ^b   Bryjová, Anna ^b   Bryja, Josef ^b   Smith, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Additive genetic benefit; Female mate choice; Genetic compatibility; Good genes; Mate choice; MHC; Nonadditive genetic benefit; Olfactory cues; Rhodeus ocellatus; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CYPRINID; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; GOOD GENES HYPOTHESIS; GROWTH RATE; INCOMPATIBILITY; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MATE CHOICE; OLFACTORY CUE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CYPRINIFORMES; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETICS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MATE CHOICE;

ANIMALS; CYPRINIDAE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL;

RHODEUS; RHODEUS OCELLATUS; ROSA CHINENSIS;

EID: 77953887344     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00961.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Aguilar A, Garza J C. Patterns of historical balancing selection on the salmonid major histocompatibility complex class II β gene. J. Mol. Evol. 2007, 65:34-43.
2. Almeida O G, Miranda A, Frade P, Hubbard P C, Barata E N, Canário A V M. Urine as a social signal in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Chem. Senses 2005, 30(Suppl 1):i309-i310.
3. Andersson M. Sexual selection 1994, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Andersson M, Simmons L W. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:296-302.
5. Arkush K D, Giese A R, Mendonca H L, McBride A M, Marty G D, Hedrick P W. Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59:966-975.
6. Barber I, Arnott S A, Braithwaite V A, Andrew J, Huntingford F A. Carotenoid-based sexual coloration and body condition of nesting male sticklebacks. J. Fish Biol. 2000, 57:777-790.
7. Barton N. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:551-568.
8. Bonneaud C, Chastel O, Federici P, Westerdahl H, Sorci G. Complex MHC-based mate choice in a wild passerine. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:1111-1116.
9. Bryja J, Galan M, Charbonnel N, Cosson J-F. Analysis of major histocompatibility complex class II gene in water voles using capillary electrophoresis-single stranded conformation polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5:173-176.
10. Candolin U, Reynolds D C. Sexual signaling in the European bitterling: females learn the truth by direct inspection of the resource. Behav. Ecol. 2001, 12:407-411.
11. Casalini M. Mate choice and oviposition decisions in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). 2007, MSc thesis, Univ. of Padua
12. Casalini M, Agbali M, Reichard M, Konečna M, Bryjova A, Smith C. Male dominance, female mate choice and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution 2009, 63:366-376.
13. Charlesworth B, Coyne J A, Barton N H. The relative rates of evolution of sex- chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 1987, 130:113-146.
14. Clarke B, Kirby D R S. Maintenance of histocompatibility polymorphisms. Nature 1966, 211:999-1000.
15. Consuegra S, Garcia de Leaniz C. MHC-mediated mate choice increases parasite resistance in salmon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:1397-1403.
16. Dawson D A, Burland T M, Douglas A E, Le Comber S C, Bradshaw M. Isolation of microsatellite loci in the freshwater fish, the bitterling Rhodeus sericeus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2003, 3:199-202.
17. Dziminski M A, Roberts D J, Simmons L W. Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana. Evolution 2008, 62:879-886.
18. Eberhard W G. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice 1996, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
19. Eggert F, Müller-Ruchholtz W, Ferstl R. Olfactory cues associated with the major histocompatibility complex. Genetica 1999, 104:191-197.
20. Forsberg L A, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Grahn M. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout-females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1859-1869.
21. Gerlach G, Hodgins-Davis A, Avolio C, Schunter C. Kin recognition in zebrafish: a 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:2165-2170.
22. Getahun D, Ananth C V, Selvam N, Demissie K. Adverse perinatal outcomes among interracial couples in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 106:81-88.
23. Hill A V S. Immunogenetics and genomics. The Lancet 2001, 357:2037-2041.
24. Ivy T M. Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:479-487.
25. Jiggins C D, Naisbit R E, Coe R L, Mallet J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 2001, 411:302-305.
26. Jordan W C, Bruford M W. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 1998, 81:127-133.
27. Kalbe M, Eizaguirre C, Dankert I, Reusch T B H, Sommerfeld R D, Wegner K M, Milinski M. Lifetime reproductive success is maximized with optimal major histocompatibility complex diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:925-934.
28. Kalinowski S T, Taper M L, Marshall T C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1099-1006.
29. Kanoh Y. Pre-oviposition ejaculation in externally fertilizing fish: how sneaker male rose bitterlings contrive to mate. Ethology 1996, 102:883-899.
30. Kanoh Y. Reproductive success associated with territoriality, sneaking and grouping in male rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 2000, 57:143-154.
31. Kim U, Park S. Eggs development and larvae of the rose bitterling Rhodeus ocellatus (KNER). Bull. Kor. Fish. Soc. 1985, 18:586-593.
32. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 1982, 36:1-12.
33. Kitamura J. Factors affecting seasonal mortality of rosy bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus kurumeus) embryos on the gills of their host mussel. Popul. Ecol. 2005, 47:41-51.
34. Kitamura J. Adaptive spatial utilization of host mussels by the Japanese rosy bitterling Rhodeus ocellatus kurumeus. J. Fish Biol. 2006, 69:263-271.
35. Kitamura J. Reproductive ecology and host utilization of four sympatric bitterling (Acheilognathinae, Cyprinidae) in a lowland reach of the Harai River in Mie, Japan. Environ. Biol. Fish. 2007, 78:37-55.
36. Klein J, Bontrop R E, Dawkins R L, Erlich H A, Gyllensten U B, Heise E R, Jones P P, Parham P, Wakeland E K, Watkins D I. Nomenclature for the major histocompatibility complexes of different species: a proposal. Immunogenetics 1990, 31:217-219.
37. Kosakovsky Pond S L, Frost S D W. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:1208-1222.
38. Kosakovsky Pond S L, Frost S D W, Muse S V. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:676-679.
39. Kotiaho J, Puurtinen M. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:683-644.
40. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L. " Good genes as heterozygosity": the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:1279-1285.
41. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits 1998, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
42. Maynard Smith J, Harper D. Animal signals 2003, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
43. Milinski M, Griffiths S, Wegner K M, Reusch T B H, Haas-Assenbaum A, Boehm T. Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:4414-4418.
44. Nagata Y. Spawning period and migration of rose bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus, in a small pond. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 1985, 32:79-89.
45. Neff B D, Pitcher T E. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:19-38.
46. Nowak M A, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Austyn J M. The optimal number of major histocompatibility complex molecules in an individual. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89:10896-10899.
47. Nystrom M, Caughey A, Lyell D, Druzin M, El-Sayed Y. Perinatal outcomes among Asian-white interracial couples. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 199:385.e1-385.e5.
48. Olsson M, Madsen T, Wapstra E, Silverin B, Ujvari B, Wittzell H. MHC, health, color, and reproductive success in sand lizards. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005, 58:289-294.
49. Ottová E, Šimková A, Martin J F, Goüy de Bellocq J, Gelnar M, Allienne J F, Morand S. Evolution and trans-species polymorphism of MHC class IIβ genes in cyprinid fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005, 18:199-222.
50. Pateman-Jones C. Sperm competition and male mating tactics in the bitterling fishes. 2008, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Leicester
51. Penn D. The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 2002, 108:1-21.
52. Penn D, Potts W K. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:145-164.
53. Piálek J, Albrecht T. Choosing mates: complementary versus compatible genes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:63.
54. Piertney S B, Oliver M K. The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 2006, 9:7-21.
55. Potts W K, Manning C J, Wakeland E K. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 1991, 352:619-621.
56. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho J S. Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:157-158.
57. Qvarnström A, Forsgren E. Should female prefer dominant males?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:498-503.
58. Reichard M, Jurajda P, Smith C. Male-male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2004, 56:34-41.
59. Reichard M, Bryja J, Ondračková M, Dávidová M, Kaniewska P, Smith C. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:1533-1542.
60. Reichard M, Smith C, Bryja P. Seasonal change in the opportunity for sexual selection. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:642-651.
61. Reichard M, Ondračková M, Bryjova A, Smith C, Bryja P. Breeding resource distribution affects selection gradients on male phenotypic traits: experimental study on lifetime reproductive success in the bitterling fish (Rhodeus amarus). Evolution 2009, 63:377-390.
62. Reusch T B H, Haberli M A, Aeschlimann P B, Milinski M. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 2001, 414:300-302.
63. Richardson D S, Komdeur J, Burke T, von Schanz T. MHC based patterns of social and extra pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2005, 272:759-767.
64. Rodd F H, Hughes K A, Grether G F, Baril C T. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:475-481.
65. Rosenberg T J, Garbers S, Lipkind H, Chiasson M. Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups. Am. J. Public Health 2005, 95:1545-1551.
66. Rousset F. GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour 2008, 8:103-106.
67. Sambrook J G, Figueroa F, Beck S. A genome-wide survey of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) genes and their paralogues in zebrafish. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:152.
68. Sandberg M, Eriksson L, Jonsson J, Sjostrom M, Wold S. New chemical descriptors relevant for the design of biologically active peptides. A multivariate characterization of 87 amino acids. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41:2481.
69. Schwensow N, Fietz J, Dausmann K H, Sommer S. Neutral versus adaptive genetic variation in parasite resistance: importance of major histocompatibility complex supertypes in a free-ranging primate. Heredity 2007, 99:265-277.
70. Schwensow N, Eberle M, Sommer S. Compatibility counts: MHC-associated mate choice in a wild promiscuous primate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:555-564.
71. Smith C, Reichard M. Females solicit sneakers to improve fertilisation success in the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2005, 272:1683-1688.
72. Smith C, Reynolds J D, Sutherland W J, Jurajda P. Adaptive host choice and avoidance of superparasitism in the spawning decisions of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2000, 48:29-35.
73. Smith C, Rippon K, Douglas A, Jurajda P. A proximate cue for oviposition site choice in the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Freshwat. Biol. 2001, 46:903-911.
74. Smith C, Douglas A, Jurajda P. Sexual conflict, sexual selection and sperm competition in the spawning decisions of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2002, 51:433-439.
75. Smith C, Reichard M, Jurajda P. Assessment of sperm competition by European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2003, 53:206-213.
76. Smith C, Reichard M, Jurajda P, Przybylski M. The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). J. Zool. 2004a, 262:107-124.
77. Smith C, Barber I, Wootton R J, Chittka L. A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2004b, 271:949-955.
78. Smith C, Zhu Y, Liu H, Reichard M. Deceptive female oviposition behaviour elicits male ejaculation in the European bitterling. J. Fish Biol. 2007, 71:1841-1846.
79. Smith C, Pateman-Jones C, ZiA{ogonek}ba G, Przybylski M, Reichard M. Sperm depletion as a consequence of increased sperm competition risk in the European bitterling (Rhodeus amarus). Anim. Behav. 2009, 77:1227-1233.
80. Spence R, Smith C. Mating preference of female zebrafish, Danio rerio, in relation to male dominance. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17:779-783.
81. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
82. Tregenza T, Wedell N. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1013-1027.
83. Turelli M, Orr H A. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 2000, 154:1663-1679.
84. van Erp S H M, Egberts E, Stet R J M. Characterization of major histocompatibility complex class II A and B genes in gynogenetic carp clone. Immunogenetics 1996, 41:1-17.
85. van Valen L. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theor. 1973, 1:1-30.
86. Wagner W E. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55:1029-1042.
87. Wedekind C, Füri S. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264:1471-1479.
88. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke A J. MHC dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 1995, 260:245-249.
89. Wedekind C, Muller R, Spicher H. Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish. J. Evol. Biol. 2001, 14:980-986.
90. Wootton R J. The ecology of teleost fishes 1998, Kluwer, Dordrecht
91. Yeates S E, Einum S, Fleming I A, Megens H-J, Stet R J M, Hindar K, Holt W V, Van Look K J W, Gage M J G. Atlantic salmon eggs favour sperm in competition that have similar major histocompatibility alleles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:559-566.
92. Yokoi K, Ohta H, Hosoya K. Sperm motility and cryopreservation of spermatozoa in freshwater gobies. J. Fish Biol. 2008, 72:534-544.
93. Zeh J A, Zeh D W. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1996, 263:1711-1717.
94. Zeh J A, Zeh D W. The evolution of polyandry. 2. Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264:69-75.