The MHC and non-random mating in a captive population of Chinook salmon

Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-185

  Neff, B D ^a   Garner, S R ^a   Heath, J W ^b   Heath, D D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b Yellow Island Aquaculture Ltd   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fitness; Major histocompatibility complex; Mate choice; Reproductive success; Salmon; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ADAPTATION; CAPTIVE POPULATION; COLOR MORPH; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; MATE CHOICE; MATING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SALMON;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENES, MHC CLASS II; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; REPRODUCTION; SALMON; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 47949108438     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.43     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abbott JC, Dunbrack RL, Orr CD (1985). The interaction of size and experience in dominance relationships of juvenile steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri). Behaviour 92: 241-253.
2. Andersson MB (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
3. Arkush KD, Giese AR, Mendonca HL, McBride AM, Marty GD, Hedrick PW (2002). Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Can J Fisheries Aquat Sci 59: 966-975.
4. Basolo AL (2006). Genetic linkage and color polymorphism in the Southern platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus): a model system for studies of color pattern evolution. Zebrafish 3: 65-83.
5. Beacham TD, Murray CB (1993). Fecundity and egg size variation in North American Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). J Fish Biol 42: 485-508.
6. Berejikian BA, Tezak EP, LaRae AL (2000). Female mate choice and spawning behaviour of Chinook salmon under experimental conditions. J Fish Biol 57: 647-661.
7. Bernatchez L, Landry C (2003). MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J Evol Biol 16: 363-377.
8. Bonneaud C, Chastel O, Federici P, Westerdahl H, Sorci G (2006). Complex MHC-based mate choice in a wild passerine. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273: 1111-1116.
9. Brooks R, Endler JA (2001). Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55: 1002-1015.
10. Brown JH, Jardetzky T, Saper MA, Samraoui B, Bjorkman PJ, Wiley DC (1988). A hypothetical model of the foreign antigen-binding site of class II histocompatibility molecules. Nature 332: 845-850.
11. Clutton-Brock TH (1982). The functions of antlers. Behaviour 79: 108-125.
12. Craig JK, Foote CJ (2001). Countergradient variation and secondary sexual color: phenotypic convergence promotes genetic divergence in carotenoid use between sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Evolution 55: 380-391.
13. Dickerson BR, Brinck KW, Willson MF, Bentzen P, Quinn TP (2005). Relative importance of salmon body size and arrival time at breeding grounds to reproductive success. Ecology 86: 347-352.
14. Dickerson BR, Quinn TP, Willson MF (2002). Body size, arrival date, and reproductive success of pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha. Ethol Ecol Evol 14: 29-44.
15. Docker MF, Heath DD (2002). PCR-based markers detect genetic variation at growth and immune function-related loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 606-609.
16. Doherty PC, Zinkernagel RM (1975). Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex. Nature 256: 50-52.
17. Ekblom R, Sæther SA, Grahn M, Fiske P, Kålås JA, Höglund J (2004). Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Mol Ecol 13: 3821-3828.
18. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-223.
19. Enders MM (1993). The effect of male size and operational sex ratio on male mating success in the common spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Anim Behav 46: 835-846.
20. Endler JA, Houde AE (1995). Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
21. Fitzpatrick JL, Henry JC, Liley NR, Devlin RH (2005). Sperm characteristics and fertilization success of masculinized coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 249: 459-468.
22. Fleming IA (1998). Pattern and variability in the breeding system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with comparisons to other salmonids. Can J Fisheries Aquat Sci 55 (Suppl 1): 59-76.
23. Fleming IA, Gross MR (1993). Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecol Appl 3: 230-245.
24. Fleming IA, Gross MR (1994). Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48: 637-657.
25. Fleming IA, Hindar K, Mjolnerod IB, Jonsson B, Balstad T, Lamberg A (2000). Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267: 1517-1523.
26. Foote CJ (1989). Female mate preference in Pacific salmon. Anim Behav 38: 721-723.
27. Foote CJ (1990). An experimental comparison of male and female spawning territoriality in a Pacific salmon. Behaviour 115: 283-314.
28. Forsberg LA, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Grahn M (2007). Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. J Evol Biol 20: 1859-1869.
29. Freeman-Gallant CR, Meguerdichian M, Wheelwright NT, Sollecito SV (2003). Social pairing and female mating fidelity predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in a songbird. Mol Ecol 12: 3077-3083.
30. Grimholt U, Larsen S, Nordmo R, Midtlyng P, Kjoeglum S, Storset A et al. (2003). MHC polymorphism and disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar); facing pathogens with single expressed major histocompatibility class I and class II loci. Immunogenetics 55: 210-219.
31. Hamon TR, Foote CJ (2005). Concurrent natural and sexual selection in wild male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Evolution 59: 1104-1118.
32. Hansen JD, Strassburger P, Thorgaard GH, Young WP, Du Pasquier L (1999). Expression, linkage, and polymorphism of MHC-related genes in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J Immunol 163: 774-786.
33. Healey MC (1991). Life history of Chinook Salmon. In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds). Pacific Salmon Life Histories. University of British Columbia Press: Vancouver, pp 311-394.
34. Heath DD, Heath JW, Bryden CA, Johnson RM, Fox CW (2003). Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science 299: 1738-1740.
35. Heath DD, Rankin L, Bryden CA, Heath JW, Shrimpton JM (2002). Heritability and Y-chromosome influence in the jack male life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Heredity 89: 311-317.
36. Hill AVS, Allsopp CEM, Kwiatkowski D, Anstey NM, Twumasi P, Rowe PA et al. (1991). Common West African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria. Nature 352: 595-600.
37. Hill GE (1991). Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350: 337-339.
38. Höglund E, Balm PHM, Winberg S (2000). Skin darkening, a potential social signal in subordinate Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus): The regulatory role of brain monoamines and proopiomelanocortin-derived peptides. J Exp Biol 203: 1711-1721.
39. Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Capra JD (1999). Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease, 4th edn. Current Biology Publications: London, UK.
40. Jordan WC, Bruford MW (1998). New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 81: 127-133.
41. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106.
42. Kim TJ, Parker KM, Hedrick PW (1999). Major histocompatibility complex differentiation in Sacramento River Chinook salmon. Genetics 151: 1115-1122.
43. Klump GM, Gerhardt HC (1987). Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature 326: 286-288.
44. Koskinen MT, Hirvonen H, Landry PA, Primmer CR (2004). The benefits of increasing the number of microsatellites utilized in genetic population studies: an empirical perspective. Hereditas 141: 61-67.
45. Kurtz J, Kalbe M, Aeschlimann PB, Häberli MA, Wegner KM, Reusch TBH et al. (2004). Major histocompatibility complex diversity influences parasite resistance and innate immunity in sticklebacks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271: 197-204.
46. Kurtz J, Wegner KM, Kalbe M, Reusch TBH, Schaschl H, Hasselquist D et al. (2006). MHC genes and oxidative stress in sticklebacks: an immuno-ecological approach. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273: 1407-1414.
47. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2001). Good genes as heterozygosity: the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 1279-1285.
48. Langefors A, Lohm J, Grahn M, Andersen O, von Schantz T (2001). Association between major histocompatibility complex class IIB alleles and resistance to Aeromonas salmonicida in Atlantic salmon. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 479-485.
49. Leinders-Zufall T, Brennan P, Widmayer P, Chandramani P, Maul-Pavicic A, Jäger M et al. (2004). MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306: 1033-1037.
50. Lohm J, Grahn M, Langefors A, Andersen O, Storset A, von Schantz T (2002). Experimental evidence for major histocompatibility complex-allele- specific resistance to a bacterial infection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269: 2029-2033.
51. Manly BFJ (1997). Randomization, Bootstrapping and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall: London, UK.
52. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
53. Mays HL, Hill GE (2004). Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecol Evol 19: 554-559.
54. McGraw KJ (2006). Mechanics of carotenoid-based coloration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds). Bird Coloration: Mechanisms and Measurements. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, vol. I, pp 177-242.
55. McLean JE, Bentzen P, Quinn TP (2004). Does size matter? Fitness-related factors in steelhead trout determined by genetic parentage assignment. Ecology 85: 2979-2985.
56. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990). Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344: 330-333.
57. Miller KM, Withler RE (1996). Sequence analysis of a polymorphic MHC class II gene in Pacific salmon. Immunogenetics 43: 337-351.
58. Neff BD, Fu P, Gross MR (2000). Microsatellite multiplexing in fish. Trans Am Fisheries Soc 129: 584-593.
59. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005). Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14: 19-38.
60. Nowak MA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Austyn JM (1992). The optimal number of major histocompatibility complex molecules in an individual. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 10896-10899.
61. O'Connor KI, Metcalfe NB, Taylor AC (1999). Does darkening signal submission in territorial contests between juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar? Anim Behav 58: 1269-1276.
62. Olsen JB, Wenburg JK, Bentzen P (1996). Semiautomated multilocus genotyping of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) using microsatellites. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5: 259-272.
63. Penn DJ (2002). The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108: 1-21.
64. Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK (2002). MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 11260-11264.
65. Penn D, Potts W (1998). MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265: 1299-1306.
66. Piferrer F (2001). Endocrine sex control strategies for the feminization of teleost fish. Aquaculture 197: 229-281.
67. Pitcher TE, Neff BD (2006). MHC class IIB alleles contribute to both additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon. Mol Ecol 15: 2357-2365.
68. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK (1991). Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352: 619-621.
69. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258-275.
70. Reusch TBH, Haberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M (2001). Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414: 300-302.
71. Roberts SC, Gosling LM (2003). Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nat Genet 35: 103-106.
72. Seamons TR, Bentzen P, Quinn TP (2007). DNA parentage analysis reveals inter-annual variation in selection: results from 19 consecutive brood years in steelhead trout. Evol Ecol Res 9: 409-431.
73. Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005). UV-blue structural coloration and competition for nestboxes in male eastern bluebirds. Anim Behav 69: 67-72.
74. Skarstein F, Folstad I, Liljedal S, Grahn M (2005). MHC and fertilization success in the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57: 374-380.
75. Sommer S (2005). Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in a monogamous rodent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58: 181-189.
76. Stapley J, Whiting MJ (2006). Ultraviolet signals fighting ability in a lizard. Biol Lett 2: 169-172.
77. Steen RP, Quinn TP (1999). Egg burial depth by sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): implications for survival of embryos and natural selection on female body size. Can J Zool 77: 836-841.
78. van den Berghe EP, Gross MR (1989). Natural selection resulting from female breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43: 125-140.
79. Villafuerte R, Negro JJ (1998). Digital imaging for colour measurement in ecological research. Ecol Lett 1: 151-154.
80. Wakeland EK, Boehme S, She JX, Lu CC, McIndoe RA, Cheng I et al. (1990). Ancestral polymorphisms of MHC class II genes: divergent allele advantage. Immunol Res 9: 115-122.
81. Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC (1998). Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280: 1928-1930.
82. Williamson KS, Cordes JF, May B (2002). Characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 17-19.
83. Wolf K (1988). Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus. In: Wolf K (ed) Fish Viruses and Fish Viral Diseases. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, pp 83-114.
84. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J et al. (1976). Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 144: 1324-1335.
85. Ziegler A, Kentenich H, Uchanska-Ziegier B (2005). Female choice and the MHC. Trends Immunol 26: 496-502.