In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone)

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 4309-4318

  Seyednejad, Hajar ^a   Gawlitta, Debby ^b   Kuiper, Raoul V ^c   De Bruin, Alain ^c   Van Nostrum, Cornelus F ^a   Vermonden, Tina ^a   Dhert, Wouter J A ^b   Hennink, Wim E ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Biodegradation; Functionalized polyester; Polycaprolactone

Indexed keywords

3D SCAFFOLDS; BALB/C MICE; CAPROLACTONE; CELL-MATERIAL INTERACTION; DEGRADATION RATE; DEGRADATION TIME; FIBER DEPOSITION; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; LIPASE SOLUTIONS; NMR ANALYSIS; NO WEIGHT LOSS; POROUS SCAFFOLD; POST-IMPLANTATION; RESIDUAL WEIGHT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) SCAFFOLDS; TIME FRAME; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; VASCULARIZATION;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; DEGRADATION; ESTERS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYCAPROLACTONE; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

POLY(HYDROXYMETHYLGLYCOLIDE CO EPSILON CAPROLACTONE); POLYCAPROLACTONE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ACTIN; ALPHA SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN, MOUSE; ALPHA-SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN, MOUSE; BIOMATERIAL; POLYESTER;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; FOREIGN BODY; GIANT CELL; HISTOLOGY; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROPHAGE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VASCULARIZATION; ANIMAL; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; HYDROXYLATION; IMPLANTATION; INFLAMMATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE;

MUS;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; FEMALE; HYDROXYLATION; INFLAMMATION; LIPASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYESTERS; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84858862640     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Causa F., Netti P.A., Ambrosio L. A multi-functional scaffold for tissue regeneration: the need to engineer a tissue analogue. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5093-5099.
2. Williams D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2941-2953.
3. Jones A.C., Arns C.H., Hutmacher D.W., Milthorpe B.K., Sheppard A.P., Knackstedt M.A. The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1440-1451.
4. Shoichet M.S. Polymer scaffolds for biomaterials applications. Macromolecules 2009, 43:581-591.
5. Karageorgiou V., Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005, 26:5474-5491.
6. Hulbert S.F., Young F.A., Mathews R.S., Klawitter J.J., Talbert C.D., Stelling F.H. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1970, 4:433-456.
7. Ameddah H., Assas M. Bio-CAD reverse engineering of free-form surfaces by planar contours. Comput Aided Design Appl 2011, 8:37-42.
8. Fedorovich N.E., Alblas J., Hennink W.E., Oner F.C., Dhert W.J.A. Organ printing: the future of bone regeneration?. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:601-606.
9. Yeong W.Y., Chua C.K., Leong K.F., Chandrasekaran M. Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. Trends Biotechnol 2004, 22:643-652.
10. Park S.A., Lee S.H., Kim W.D. Fabrication of porous polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA) blend scaffolds using a 3D plotting system for bone tissue engineering. Bioprocess Biosystems Eng 2011, 34:505-513.
11. Park S.A., Kim H.J., Lee S.H., Lee J.H., Kim H.K., Yoon T.R., et al. Fabrication of nano/microfiber scaffolds using a combination of rapid prototyping and electrospinning systems. Polym Eng Sci 2011, 51:1883-1890.
12. Sobral J.M., Caridade S.G., Sousa R.A., Mano J.F., Reis R.L. Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7:1009-1018.
13. Yoon H., Kim G.H., Koh Y.H. A micro-scale surface-structured PCL scaffold fabricated by a 3D plotter and a chemical blowing agent. J Biomat Sci Polym Ed 2010, 21:159-170.
14. Hoque M.E., San W.Y., Wei F., Li S., Huang M.H., Vert M., et al. Processing of polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone-based copolymers into 3D scaffolds, and their cellular responses. Tissue Eng A 2009, 15:3013-3024.
15. Woodruff M.A., Hutmacher D.W. The return of a forgotten polymer - polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 2010, 35:1217-1256.
16. Seyednejad H., Vermonden T., Fedorovich N.E., Van Eijk R., Van Steenbergen M.J., Dhert W.J.A., et al. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyl-functionalized caprolactone copolymers and their effect on adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:3048-3054.
17. Seyednejad H., Gawlitta D., Dhert W.J.A., Van Nostrum C.F., Vermonden T., Hennink W.E. Preparation and characterization of a three-dimensional printed scaffold based on a functionalized polyester for bone tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7:1999-2006.
18. Seyednejad H., Ji W., Schuurman W., Dhert W.J.A., Malda J., Yang F., et al. An electrospun degradable scaffold based on a novel hydrophilic polyester for tissue engineering applications. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:1684-1692.
19. Takemura R., Werb Z. Secretory products of macrophages and their physiological functions. Am J Physiol cell physiol 1984, 15:C1-C9.
20. Kulkarni A., Reiche J., Hartmann J., Kratz K., Lendlein A. Selective enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) containing multiblock copolymers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008, 68:46-56.
21. Leemhuis M., Van Nostrum C.F., Kruijtzer J.A.W., Zhong Z.Y., Ten Breteler M.R., Dijkstra P.J., et al. Functionalized poly(α-hydroxy acid)s via ring-opening polymerization: toward hydrophilic polyesters with pendant hydroxyl groups. Macromolecules 2006, 39:3500-3508.
22. Leemhuis M., van Steenis J.H., van Uxem M.J., van Nostrum C.F., Hennink W.E. A versatile route to functionalized dilactones as monomers for the synthesis of poly(α-hydroxy) acids. Eur J Org Chem 2003, 17:3344-3349.
23. Li S., Liu L., Garreau H., Vert M. Lipase-catalyzed biodegradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) blended with various polylactide-based polymers. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4:372-377.
24. Lam C.X.F., Hutmacher D.W., Schantz J.T., Woodruff M.A., Teoh S.H. Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009, 90:906-919.
25. Ji W., Yang F., van den Beucken J.J.J.P., Bian Z., Fan M., Chen Z., et al. Fibrous scaffolds loaded with protein prepared by blend or coaxial electrospinning. Acta Biomater 2011, 6:4199-4207.
26. Mas Estelles J., Vidaurre A., Meseguer Duenas J., Castilla Cortazar I. Physical characterization of polycaprolactone scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008, 19:189-195.
27. Sivalingam G., Chattopadhyay S., Madras G. Enzymatic degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone), poly (vinyl acetate) and their blends by lipases. Chem Eng Sci 2003, 58:2911-2919.
28. Zeng J., Chen X., Liang Q., Xu X., Jing X. Enzymatic degradation of poly(L-lactide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun fibers. Macromol Biosci 2004, 4:1118-1125.
29. Gan Z., Yu D., Zhong Z., Liang Q., Jing X. Enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(DL-lactide) blends in phosphate buffer solution. Polymer 1999, 40:2859-2862.
30. Ahola S., Turon X., österberg M., Laine J., Rojas O.J. Enzymatic hydrolysis of native cellulose nanofibrils and other cellulose model films: effect of surface structure. Langmuir 2008, 24:11592-11599.
31. Herzog K., Müller R.J., Deckwer W.D. Mechanism and kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester nanoparticles by lipases. Polym Degrad Stabil 2006, 91:2486-2498.
32. Mochizuki M., Hirami M. Structural effects on the biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters. Polym Adv Technol 1997, 8:203-209.
33. Sun H., Mei L., Song C., Cui X., Wang P. The in vivo degradation, absorption and excretion of PCL-based implant. Biomaterials 2006, 27:1735-1740.
34. Pitt C.G., Chasalow F.I., Hibionada Y.M., Klimas D.M., Schindler A. Aliphatic polyestres - 1. The degradation of poly( epsilon -caprolactone) in vivo. J Appl Polym Sci 1981, 26:3779-3787.
35. Franz S., Rammelt S., Scharnweber D., Simon J.C. Immune responses to implants - A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6692-6709.
36. Alves C.M., Reis R.L., Hunt J.A. The competitive adsorption of human proteins onto natural-based biomaterials. J Roy Soc Interf 2010, 7:1367-1377.
37. Cunliffe D., Smart C.A., Alexander C., Vulfson E.N. Bacterial adhesion at synthetic surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65:4995-5002.
38. Hallab N.J., Bundy K.J., O'Connor K., Moses R.L., Jacobs J.J. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001, 7:55-70.
39. Xia Z., Triffitt J.T. A review on macrophage responses to biomaterials. Biomed Mater 2006, 1:R1-R9.
40. Achim G.P. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials 1996, 17:103-114.
41. Gopferich A., Langer R. Influence of microstructure and monomer properties on the erosion mechanism of a class of polyanhydrides. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 1993, 31:2445-2458.
42. Anderson J.M., Rodriguez A., Chang D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008, 20:86-100.
43. Chen S., Jones J.A., Xu Y., Low H.Y., Anderson J.M., Leong K.W. Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3479-3491.
44. Pieper J.S., van Wachem P.B., van Luyn M.J.A., Brouwer L.A., Hafmans T., Veerkamp J.H., et al. Attachment of glycosaminoglycans to collagenous matrices modulates the tissue response in rats. Biomaterials 2000, 21:1689-1699.
45. Burugapalli K., Pandit A. Characterization of tissue response and in vivo degradation of cholecyst-derived extracellular matrix. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:3439-3451.
46. Byers B.A., Guldberg R.E., Hutmacher D.W., Garcia A.J. Effects of Runx2 genetic engineering and in vitro maturation of tissue-engineered constructs on the repair of critical size bone defects. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 76:646-655.
47. Schantz J.T., Ng M.M.L., Netto P., Chong Lai Ming J., Wong K.M., Hutmacher D.W., et al. Application of an X-ray microscopy technique to evaluate tissue-engineered bone-scaffold constructs. Mater Sci Eng C 2002, 20:9-17.
48. Censi R., Van Putten S., Vermonden T., Di Martino P., Van Nostrum C.F., Harmsen M.C., et al. The tissue response to photopolymerized PEG-p(HPMAm-lactate)-based hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011, 97:219-229.