Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue NOV, 2010, Pages

  Wulf, Gabriele ^a   Chiviacowsky, Suzete ^b   Schiller, Eduardo ^b   Ávila, Luciana Toaldo Gentilini ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Focus of attention; Knowledge of performance; Soccer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858702502     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abernethy, B. (1988). Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some methodological constraints. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 14, 101-132.
2. Badami, R. Vaezmousavi, M., Wulf, G., and Namazizadeh, M. (in press). Feedback after good trials enhances intrinsic motivation. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport.
3. Bargh, J. A., and Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 73-79.
4. Bell, J. J., and Hardy, J. (2009). Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 21, 163-177.
5. Bilodeau, E. A., and Bilodeau, I. M. (1958). Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 379-383.
6. Bilodeau, E. A., Bilodeau, I. M., and Schumsky, D. A. (1959). Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 142-144.
7. Chen, D. D., Hendrick, J. L., and Lidor, R. (2002). Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: the use of self-regulated feedback information. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 43, 1, 69-86.
8. Chiviacowsky, S., and Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 73, 408-415.
9. Chiviacowsky, S., and Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 76, 42-48.
10. Chiviacowsky, S., and Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 78, 40-47.
11. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Laroque de Medeiros, F., Kaefer, A., and Tani, G. (2008). Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year old children. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 79, 405-410.
12. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., and Borges, T. (2009). KR after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 80, 663-668.
13. Dunham, P., and Mueller, R. (1993). Effect of fading knowledge of results on acquisition, retention, and transfer of a simple motor skill. Percept. Mot. Skills 77, 1187-1192.
14. Durham, K., Van Vliet, P. M., Badger, F., and Sackley, C. (2009). Use of information feedback and attentional focus of feedback in treating the person with a hemiplegic arm. Physiother. Res. Int. 14, 77-90.
15. Fairbrother, J. T., Post, P. G., Houchin, G., and Barros, J. (2009). Self-controlled amount of practice benefits motor learning. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 31, S62.
16. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., and Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 68, 269-279.
17. Lai, Q., and Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. J. Mot. Behav. 30, 51-59.
18. Lewthwaite, R., and Wulf, G. (2010). Grand challenge for movement science and sport psychology: embracing the social-cognitive-affective-motor nature of motor behavior. Front. Mov. Sci. Sport Psychol. 1:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00042.
19. Lewthwaite, R., and Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 738-749.
20. Lohse, K. L., Sherwood, D. E., and Healy, A. F. (2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Hum. Mov. Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.001.
21. Marchant, D. C. (in press). Attentional focusing instructions, and force production. Front. Mov. Sci. Sport Psych.
22. Marchant, D. C., Greig, M., Bullough J., and Hitchen, D. (in press). Instructions to adopt an external focus enhance muscular endurance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport.
23. Marchant, D. C., Greig, M., and Scott, C. (2008) Attentional Focusing Strategies Influence Bicep EMG During Isokinetic Biceps Curls. Athletic Insight. Available at http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol10Iss2/MuscularActivity.htm. (Retrieved August 9, 2010).
24. Marchant, D. C., Greig, M., and Scott, C. (2009). Attentional focusing instructions influence force production and muscular activity during isokinetic elbow flexions. J. Strength Cond. Res. 23, 2358-2366.
25. McNevin, N. H., Shea, C. H., and Wulf, G. (2003). Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychol. Res. 67, 22-29.
26. Nicholson, D. E., and Schmidt, R. A. (1991). "Scheduling information feedback to enhance training effectiveness," in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
27. Porter, J. M., Wu, W. F. W., and Partridge, J. A. (2010). Focus of attention and verbal instructions: strategies of elite track and field coaches and athletes. Sport Sci. Rev. 19, 199-211.
28. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., and Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical appraisal. Psychol. Bull. 95, 355-386.
29. Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., and Kozak, R. (2006). More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res. Rev. 51, 145-160.
30. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). "Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations," in Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience, eds J. Requin and G. E. Stelmach (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 59-75.
31. Schmidt, R. A., and Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 4th Edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
32. Schücker, L., Hageman, N., Strauss, B., and Völker, K. (2009). The effect of attentional focus on running economy. J. Sports Sci. 12, 1242-1248.
33. Shea, C. H., and Wulf, G. (1999). Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instruction and feedback. Hum. Mov. Sci. 18, 553-571.
34. Sparrow, W. A. (1995). Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results. Aust. J. Psychol. 47, 97-104.
35. Sparrow, W. A., and Summers, J. J. (1992). Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. J. Mot. Behav. 24, 197-209.
36. Stapel, D. A., and Blanton, H. (2004). From seeing to being: subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 468-481.
37. Stoate, I., and Wulf, G. (in press). Does the attentional focus adopted by swimmers affect their performance? Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach.
38. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). "Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review," in Advances in Motor Learning and Control, ed. H. N. Zelaznik (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics), 37-66.
39. Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Educational Psychology. New York: Columbia University.
40. Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. Am. J. Psychol. 39, 212-222.
41. Vance, J., Wulf, G., Töllner, T., McNevin, N. H., and Mercer, J. (2004). EMG activity as a function of the performer's focus of attention. J. Mot. Behav. 36, 450-459.
42. Weeks, D. L., and Kordus, R. N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 69, 224-230.
43. Winstein, C. J., and Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16, 677-691.
44. Wishart, L. R., and Lee, T. D. (1997). Effect of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning of a motor skill. Percept. Mot. Skills 84, 1107-1150.
45. Wrisberg, C. A., and Wulf, G. (1997). Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning. J. Mot. Behav. 29, 17-26.
46. Wulf, G. (2007). Attention and motor skill learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
47. Wulf, G. Chiviacowsky, S., and Lewthwaite, R. (in press). Normative feedback effects on the learning of a timing task. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport.
48. Wulf, G., Dufek, J. S., Lozano, L., and Pettigrew, C. (2010). Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus of attention. Hum. Mov. Sci. 49, 440-448.
49. Wulf, G., and Lewthwaite, R. (2010). "Effortless motor learning? an external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency," in Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in Attention and Action, ed. B. Bruya (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 75-101.
50. Wulf, G., Mcconnel, N., Gärtner, M., and Schwarz, A. (2002). Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. J. Mot. Behav. 34, 171-182.
51. Wulf, G., McNevin, N. H., and Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 54A, 1143-1154.
52. Wulf, G., and Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15, 748-757.
53. Wulf, G., and Shea, C. H. (2004). "Understanding the role of augmented feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly," in Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice, eds A. M. Williams and N. J. Hodges (London: Routledge), 121-144.
54. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., and Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. J. Mot. Behav. 30, 180-192.
55. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., and Park, J.-H. (2001). Attention in motor learning: preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 72, 335-344.