Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 425-431

  Lewthwaite, Rebecca ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b University of Pelotas Center of Chemical Sciences Pharmaceutical and Food   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge of results; Motivation; Motor learning; Social comparison

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74049120663     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2010.10599703     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Holland, R. W. (2007). The noncon- scious cessation of goal pursuit: When goals and negative affect are coactivated. Journal ofPersonaliy and Social Psychology), 92, 165–178.
2. Bandura, A. (1990). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 69–164.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercse of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941–951.
5. Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1958). Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 379–383.
6. Bilodeau, E. A., Bilodeau, I. M., & Schumsky, D. A. (1959). Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–144.
7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324–332.
8. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (2002). Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences. In A. Tesser, D. A. Stapel, … J. V. Wood (Eds.), Selfand motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 13-41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408–415.
10. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42–48.
11. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40–47.
12. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Laroque de Medeiros, F., & Kaefer, A. (2008). Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 405–410.
13. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 663–668.
14. Conroy, D. E., Elliott, A. J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (2007). Competence motivation in sport and exercise: The hierarchical model of achievement motivation and Self-Determination Theory. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. (pp. 181-192). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
16. Hutchinson, J. C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2008). The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 457–472.
17. Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467.
18. Johnson, D. S., Turban, D. B., Pieper, K F., & Ng, Y M. (1996). Exploring the role of normative- and performance-based feedback in motivational processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 973–992.
19. Jourden, F. J., Bandura, A., & Banfield, J. T. (1991). The impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory factors and motor skill acquisition. Journal ofSport & Exercise Psychology, 8, 213–226.
20. Kavussanu, M., & Roberts, G. C. (1996). Motivation in physical activity contexts: The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 264–280.
21. Kuhlmann, S., Piel, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2005). Impaired memory retrieval after psychosocial stress in healthy young men. Journal ofNeurosaence, 25, 2977–2982.
22. Kühn, A. A., Brücke, C., Hübl, J., Schneider, G.-H., Kupsch, A., Eusebio, A., Brown, P. (2008). Motivation modulates motor-related feedback activity in the human basal ganglia. Current Biology, 18, R648-R650.
23. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal ofMotor Behavior, 30, 51–59.
24. Lamarche, L., Huffman, J. L., Eliasz, K. L., Gammage, K L., & Adkin, A. L. (2008). Verbal persuasion affects balance efficacy in healthy young adults. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, S32.
25. Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 738–749.
26. Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86.
27. Salmoni, A., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
28. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.
29. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Schmidt, R A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
31. Stapel, D. A., & Blanton, H. (2004). From seeing to being: Subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 468–481.
32. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33. Thorndike, E. L. (1914). Educational psychology. New York: Columbia University.
34. Thorndike, E. L. (1932). The^fundamentals of learning. New York: Teachers College.
35. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.
36. Williams, K J., Donovan, J. J., & Dodge, T. L. (2000). Self-regulation of performance: Goal establishment and goal revision processes in athletes. Human Performance, 13, 159–180.
37. Wrisberg, C. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 17–26.
38. Wulf, G. (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, 93, 96–101.
39. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference effects in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal ofMotor Behavior, 25, 254–263.
40. Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2009). Attentional and motivational influences on motor performance and learning. In A. Mornell (Ed.), Art in motion: Musical and athletic motor learning and performance (pp. 95-117). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
41. Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action, (pp. 75-101). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748–757.
43. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. Williams, & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 121-144). London: Routledge.
44. Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2008). Self-evaluative effects of temporal and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 223–227.