The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 326-332

  Alper Oz, A ^a   Arici, Nursel ^a   Arici, Selim ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Canine distalization; Coefficient of friction; Self ligation

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRICTION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CUSPID; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; FRICTION; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NICKEL; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TORQUE;

EID: 84858682505     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/032611-215.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Keith O, Jones S, Davies E. The influence of bracket material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets. J Orthod. 1993;20:109-115.
2. Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher H-A. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:397-404. (Pubitemid 20019909)
3. Downing A, McCabe J, Gordon P. A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires. J Orthod. 1994;21:349-357.
4. Rossouw PE. Friction: an overview. Semin Orthod. 2003;9:218-222. (Pubitemid 38088290)
5. Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N, Gunsolley JC. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:398-403.
6. Loftus BP, Ârtun J, Nicholls JI, Alonzo TA, Stoner JA. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:336-345.
7. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:395-402. (Pubitemid 37249454)
8. Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:39-51.
9. Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics. Am Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:542-551. (Pubitemid 40692335)
10. Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472-480.
11. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:416-422. (Pubitemid 36890637)
12. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:666-670. (Pubitemid 44716641)
13. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Camporesi M, Barbato E. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:87-90.
14. Willems G, Clocheret K, Celis JP, Verbeke G, Chatzicharalampous E, Carels C. Frictional behavior of stainless steel bracket-wire combinations subjected to small oscillating displacements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:371-377. (Pubitemid 33601790)
15. Clocheret K, Willems G, Carels C, Celis J-P. Dynamic frictional behaviour of orthodontic archwires and brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:163-170. (Pubitemid 41296489)
16. Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:377-385.
17. Boester CH, Johnston LE. A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimal force in canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:113-119.
18. Andreasen GF, Zwanziger D. A clinical evaluation of the differential force concept as applied to the edgewise bracket. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:25-40.
19. Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler H, Üner O. The drum spring (DS) retractor: a constant and continuous force for canine retraction. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:115-130. (Pubitemid 127493945)
20. Park H-S, Kwon T-G. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:703-710. (Pubitemid 39421986)
21. Herman R, Cope JB. Miniscrew implants: IMTEC Mini Ortho Implants. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:32-39. (Pubitemid 40305404)
22. Liou EJW, Pai BCJ, Lin JCY. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:42-47. (Pubitemid 38844442)
23. Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Picorelli Assis NMS, Vitral RWF. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:243-250.
24. Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:30-35.
25. Yeh C-L, Kusnoto B, Viana G, Evans CA, Drummond JL. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:704.e711-704.e722.
26. Read-Ward G, Jones S, Davies E. A comparison of selfligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. J Orthod. 1997;24:309-317.
27. Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Frictional resistance of the Damon SL bracket. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:485-489.
28. TM vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:480-485. (Pubitemid 43692581)
29. Burrow SJ. Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:626-633.
30. Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:442-447.
31. Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod. 2003;30:262-273.
32. Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:99-106. (Pubitemid 19069089)
33. Hayashi K, Uechi J, Murata M, Mizoguchi I. Comparison of maxillary canine retraction with sliding mechanics and a retraction spring: a three-dimensional analysis based on a midpalatal orthodontic implant. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:585-589. (Pubitemid 41296615)
34. Bokas J, Woods M. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains. Aust Orthod J. 2006;22(1):39-46.
35. Herman RJ, Currier GF, Miyake A. Mini-implant anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:228-235. (Pubitemid 44176320)
36. Deguchi T, Imai M, Sugawara Y, Ando R, Kushima K, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical evaluation of a low-friction attachment device during canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:968-972.
37. Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:95-100.
38. Martins RP, Buschang PH, Gandini LG Jr, Rossouw PE. Changes over time in canine retraction: an implant study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:87-93.