Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 30-35

  Thiruvenkatachari, Badri ^a   Ammayappan, Pavithranand ^b   Kandaswamy, Rajasigamani ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; SPHENOID; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC SPACE CLOSURE; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; SPHENOID BONE; TITANIUM; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 46249093942     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.044     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Salzmann J.A. Principles of orthodontics. 2nd ed. (1966), Lippincott, Philadelphia
2. Clemmer E.J., and Hayes E.W. Patient cooperation in wearing headgear. Am J Orthod 75 (1979) 517-524
3. Samuels R.H., Willner F., Knox J., and Jones M.L. A national survey of orthodontic facebow injuries in the UK and Eire. Br J Orthod 23 (1996) 11-20
4. Holland G.N., Wallace D.A., Mondino B.J., Cole S.H., and Ryan S.J. Severe ocular injuries from orthodontic headgear. Arch Ophthalmol 103 (1985) 649-651
5. Dickson G. Contact dermatitis and cervical headgear. Br Dent J 155 (1983) 112
6. Odman J., Lekholm U., Jemt T., and Thilander B. Osseointegrated implants as orthodontic anchorage in the treatment of partially edentulous adult patients. Eur J Orthod 31 (1997) 763-767
7. Roberts W.E., Marshall K.J., and Mozsary P.G. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod 60 (1990) 135-152
8. Block M.S., and Hoffman D.R. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 251-258
9. Lee J.S., Park H.S., and Kyung H.M. Micro-implant anchorage for lingual treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 35 (2001) 643-647
10. Kyung H.M., Park H.S., Bae S.M., Sung V.H., and Bongkim I.L. Development of orthodontic microimplants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod 37 (2003) 321-328
11. Thiruvenkatachari B., Pavithranand A., Rajasigamani K., and Kyung H.M. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 551-554
12. Nanda R. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics (1997), W. B Saunders, Philadelphia
13. Park H.S., Bae S.M., Kyung H.M., and Sung J.H. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 35 (2001) 417-422
14. McNamara J.A. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 86 (1984) 449-469
15. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 75 (1969) 39-53
16. Pancherz H., Ruf S., and Kohlhas P. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 437-446
17. Storey E., and Smith R. Force in orthodontics and its relations to tooth movement. Aust J Dent 56 (1952) 11-18
18. Iwasaki L., Haack J.E., Nickel J.C., and Morton J. Human tooth movement in response to continuous stress of low magnitude. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117 (2000) 175-183
19. Ricketts R.M. Development of retraction sections. Foundations of Orthodontic Research Newsletter 5 (1974) 41-44
20. Lee B.W. Relationship between tooth-movement rate and estimated pressure applied. J Dent Res 44 (1965) 1053
21. Boester C.H., and Johnston L.E. A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimum force in canine retraction. Angle Orthod 44 (1972) 113-119
22. Paulsen R.C., Speidel T.M., and Isaacson R.J. A laminographic study of cuspid retraction versus molar anchorage loss. Angle Orthod 40 (1970) 20-27
23. Huffman D.J., and Way D.C. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 453-459
24. Hixon E.H., Atikian H., Callow G.E., McDonald H.W., and Tacy R.J. Optimal force, differential force, and anchorage. Am J Orthod 55 (1969) 437-457
25. Buchter A., Wiechmann D., Koerdt S., Wiesmann H.P., Piffko J., and Meyer U. Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 (2005) 473-479
26. Sonis A.L., Van der Plas E., and Gianelly A. A comparison of elastomeric auxiliaries versus elastic thread on premolar extraction site closure: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod 89 (1986) 73-78
27. Dixon V., Read M.F.J., O'Brien K.D., Worthington H.V., and Mandall N.A. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure. J Orthod 29 (2002) 31-36
28. Darendeliler M.A., Darendeliler H., and Uner O. The drum spring (DS) retractor: a constant and continuous force for canine retraction. Eur J Orthod 19 (1997) 115-130
29. Sleichter C.G. A clinical assessment of light and heavy forces in the closure of extraction spaces. Angle Orthod 41 (1971) 66-75