Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: A critical review

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 442-447

  Burrow, S Jack ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; FRICTION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; TIME;

DENTAL ALLOYS; FRICTION; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; ORTHODONTICS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 63749090503     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blau J.P. Tribology and its nomenclature in friction and wear transitions of materials (1989), Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ
2. Jastrebski Z.B. The nature and properties of engineering materials. 3rd ed. (1987), Wiley, New York
3. Kusy R.P., and Whitley J.Q. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J Orthod 21 (1999) 199-208
4. Articolo L.C., and Kusy R.P. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 39-51
5. Thorstenson G.A., and Kusy R.P. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) 295-305
6. Thorstenson G.A., and Kusy R.P. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2002) 472-482
7. Thorstenson G.A. SmartClip self-ligating brackets frictional study. Orthod Perspect 12 (2005) 8-11
8. Sims A.P.T., Waters N.E., Birnie D.J., and Pethybridge R.J. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 15 (1993) 377-385
9. Hain M., Dhopatkar A., and Rock P. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006) 666-670
10. Braun S., Bluestein M., Moore B.K., and Benson G. Friction in perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (1999) 619-627
11. O'Reilly D., Dowling P.A., Lagerstom L., and Swartz M.L. An ex vivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding. Br J Orthod 26 (1999) 219-227
12. Hixon E.H., Aasen T.O., Clark R.A., Klosterman R., and Miller S.S. On force and tooth movement. Am J Orthod 57 (1970) 476-478
13. Jost-Brinkman P., and Miethke R.R. The effect of physiological tooth mobility on the friction between the bracket and the arch. Fortschr Kieferorthop 52 (1991) 102-109
14. Iwasaki L.R., Beatty M.W., Randall J.C., and Nickel J.C. Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 408-415
15. Frank C.A., and Nikolai R.J. A comparative study of frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 78 (1980) 593-609
16. Huffman D.J., and Way D.C. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 453-459
17. Kapila S., Angolkar P.V., Duncanson Jr. M.J., and Nanda R.S. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 117-126
18. Liew C.F. The effect of repeated displacement on sliding friction between orthodontic bracket and arch wire [thesis] (1993), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
19. Yamaguchi K., Nanda R.S., Morimoto N., and Oda Y. A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109 (1996) 50-56
20. Pandis N., Polychronopoulou A., and Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 (2007) 208-215
21. Miles P.G., Weyant R.J., and Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 480-485
22. Miles P.G. SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference?. Aust Orthod J 21 (2005) 123-127
23. Rinchuse D.J., and Miles P.G. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 (2007) 216-222
24. Miles P.G. Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 (2007) 223-225
25. Swartz L.S. Fact or fiction: the clinical relevance of in vitro steady state friction studies. J Clin Orthod 8 (2007) 427-432