Gender Differences in Adolescents' Wishful Identification With Scientist Characters on Television

Science Communication

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 163-199

  Steinke, Jocelyn ^a   Applegate, Brooks ^a   Lapinski, Maria ^b   Ryan, Lisa ^c   Long, Marilee ^d  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Calhoun Community High School   (United States)

^d Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescents; gender differences; girls and science; images of scientists; television; wishful identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858681183     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547011410250     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Education Foundation; 1998:.
2. Tech-savvy: Education girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Education Foundation; 2000:.
3. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213-262). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
4. Bandura A.Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986:.
5. Bandura A.Social cognitive theory of mass communication.Media Psychology. 2001;3:265-299.
6. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J.Bryant D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 94-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Calvert S. L.,Strong B. L.,Jacobs E. L.,Conger E. E.Interaction and participation for young Hispanic and Caucasian girls' and boys' learning of media content.Media Psychology. 2007;9:431-445.
9. Cherney I. D.,London K.Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5- to 13-year-old children.Sex Roles. 2006;54:717-726.
10. Chory-Assad R. M.,Cicchirillo V.Empathy and affective orientation as predictors of identification with television characters.Communication Research Reports. 2005;22:151-156.
11. Clements, P., & Seidman, E. (2002). The ecology of middle grades schools and possible selves: Theory, research, and action. In T. M. Brinthaupt & R. P. Lipka (Eds.), Understanding early adolescent self and identity: Applications and interventions (pp. 133-164). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Cohen J.Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters.Mass Communication and Society. 2001;4:245-264.
13. Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (2001). The use of television and other film-related media. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 47-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Land of plenty: Diversity as America's competitive edge in science, engineering and technology. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2000:.
15. Erb T. O.,Smith W. S.Validation of the attitude toward women in science scale for early adolescents.Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1984;21:391-397.
16. Eyal K.,Rubin A. M.Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2003;47:77-98.
17. Feilitzen C. V.,Linne O.The effects of television on children and adolescents: Identifying with television characters.Journal of Communication. 1975;25 (4): 51-55.
18. Fujioka Y.Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 1999;76:52-75.
19. George R.Measuring change in students' attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling.Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2000;9:213-225.
20. Green M. C.,Brock T. C.,Kaufman G. F.Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds.Communication Theory. 2004;14:311-327.
21. Greenwood D. N.Are female action heroes risky role models? Character identification, idealization, and viewer aggression.Sex Roles. 2007;57:725-732.
22. Greenwood D. N.,Pietromonaco P. R.,Long C. R.Young women's attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female TV stars.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2008;25:387-407.
23. Gupta V. K.,Turban D. B.,Bhawe N. M.The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93:1053-1061.
24. Hoffner C.Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 1996;40:389-402.
25. Hoffner C.,Buchanan M.Young adults' wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes.Media Psychology. 2005;7:325-351.
26. Hoffner C.,Levine K. J.,Sullivan Q. E.,Crowell D.,Pedrick L.,Berndt P.TV characters at work: Television's role in the occupational aspirations of economically disadvantaged youths.Journal of Career Development. 2006;33:3-18.
27. Hoffner C.,Levine K. J.,Toohey R. A.Socialization to work in late adolescence: The role of television and family.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2008;52:282-302.
28. Huston A. C.,Wright J. C.,Rice M. L.,Kerkman D.,St.Peters M.Development of television viewing patterns in early childhood: A longitudinal investigation.Developmental Psychology. 1990;26:409-420.
29. Jordan A. B.,Hersey J. C.,McDivitt J. A.,Heitzler C. D.Reducing children's television-viewing time: A qualitative study of parents and their children.Pediatrics. 2008;118:1303-1310.
30. Kincaid L.Drama, emotion, and cultural convergence.Communication Theory. 2002;12:136-152.
31. LaFollette M. C.Wizards, villains, and other scientists: The science content of television for children. 1981;:.
32. Lips H. M.The gender gap in possible selves: Divergence of academic self-views among high school and university students.Sex Roles. 2004;50:357-371.
33. Long M.,Steinke J.,Applegate B.,Lapinski M. K.,Johnson M. J.,Ghosh S.Portrayals of male and female scientists in television programs popular among middle school-age children.Science Communication. 2010;32:356-382.
34. Lonial S. C.,Van Auken S.Wishful identification with fictional characters: An assessment of the implications of gender in message dissemination to children.Journal of Advertising. 1986;15 (4): 4-42.
35. McDonald D. G.,Kim H.When I die, I feel small: Electronic game characters and the social self.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2001;45:241-258.
36. Mielke K. W.Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983:.
37. Miller C. F.,Lurye L. E.,Zosuls K. M.,Ruble D. N.Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Development and gender differences in children.Sex Roles. 2009;60:870-881.
38. Miller M. M.,Reeves B.Dramatic TV content and children's sex-role stereotypes.Journal of Broadcasting. 1976;20 (1): 35-50.
39. Misti F. L.,Shrigley R. L.,Hanson L.Science attitude scale for middle school students. 1991;:.
40. Nabi R. L.,Riddle K.Personality traits, television viewing, and the cultivation effect.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2008;52:327-348.
41. Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: Author; 2010:.
42. National Science Foundation. (2007). Now showing: Films, TV, museums and more. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/news/now_showing/.
43. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011 (Special Report NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gove/stratistics/wmpd/.
44. Broadcast rank 9/22/2003-5/26/2004, Primetime Daypart, ages 12-17. New York, NY: Author; 2004:.
45. Oswald D. L.Gender stereotypes and women's reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2008;32:196-203.
46. Persegani C.,Russo P.,Carucci C.,Nicolini M.,Papeschi L. L.,Trimarchi M.Television viewing and personality structure in children.Personality and Individual Differences. 2002;32:977-990.
47. Reeves B.,Lometti G. E.The dimensional structure of children's perceptions of television characters: A replication.Human Communication Research. 1979;5:247-256.
48. Reeves B.,Miller M. M.A multidimensional measure of children's identification with television characters.Journal of Broadcasting. 1978;22:71-86.
49. Roberts D. F.,Foehr U. G.,Rideout V.Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2005:.
50. Roeser, R. W., & Lau, S. (2002). On academic identity formation in middle school settings during early adolescence: A motivational-contextual perspective. In T. M. Brinthaupt & R. P. Lipka (Eds.), Understanding early adolescent self and identity: Applications and interventions (pp. 91-131). Albany: State University of New York Press.
51. Slater M. D.,Rouner D.Entertainment-education and elaboration-likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion.Communication Theory. 2002;12:173-191.
52. Steinke J.,Lapinski M.,Crocker N.,Zietsman-Thomas A.,Williams Y.,Evergreen S. H.,Kuchibhotla S.Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children's perceptions of women in science using the draw-a-scientist text (DAST).Science Communication. 2007;29:35-64.
53. Steinke J.,Long M.A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children's educational science programs.Science Communication. 1996;18:91-115.
54. Tian Q.,Hoffner C.Parasocial interaction and identification with liked, neutral and disliked characters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2007 San Francisco, CA; 2007.
55. Tracey T. J. G.,Sodano S. M.Issues of stability and change in interest development.Career Development Quarterly. 2008;57:51-62.
56. Turner S. L.,Lapan R.T.Evaluation of an intervention to increase non-traditional career interests and career-related self-efficacy among middle-school adolescents.Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2005;66:516-531.
57. Vermeir I.,Hogeschool G.,Geuens M.Need for closure and media use and preference of young adults.Advances in Consumer Research. 2008;35:873-874.
58. Wagner J. D.,Caudill S. R.Women scientists: 9.3 Minutes of fame?.Science. 2003 1875;300:.
59. Weisgram E. S.,Bigler R. S.Girls and science careers: The role of altruistic values and attitudes about scientific tasks.Journal of Applied Development Psychology. 2006;27:326-348.
60. Yowell C. M.Dreams of the future: The pursuit of education and career possible selves among ninth grade Latino youth.Applied Developmental Science. 2002;6:62-72.