Women scientists: 9.3 Minutes of fame? [1]

Science

Volumn 300, Issue 5627, 2003, Pages 1875-

  Wagner, J D ^a   Caudill, S R ^b  

^a TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; WOMENS EMPLOYMENT;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; GENDER; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENCE; TELEVISION; TIME;

EID: 0037709731     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Three separate analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. The first ANOVA indicated that there was no significant difference between the Evolution and The Shape of Life series in the amount of time they dedicated to an individual scientist during an interview [F(1,86) = 0.148, P = 0.70]. The remaining two ANOVA examined the relationship between gender and the amount of time the scientist was interviewed on the air. The results of those analyses are reported in the figure legend.
2. E. M. Mendoza, K. O. Johnson, Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology (Report to the Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development, 2000).
3. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Science and Engineering Indicators-2002 (NSB 02-01, NSF, Arlington, VA. 2002).