Against Nature: How Arguments about the Naturalness of Marriage Privilege Heterosexuality

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 46-62

  Cole, Elizabeth R ^a   Avery, Lanice R ^a   Dodson, Catherine ^b   Goodman, Kevin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARRIAGE; RACIAL DISPARITY; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL POLICY;

EID: 84858680279     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01735.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139-166. doi:.
2. Bennett, T., Grossberg, L., & Morris, M. (2005). New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3. Blumenfeld, W. J. & Jaekel, K. (2012). Exploring levels of Christian privilege awareness among pre-Service teachers. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 128-144.
4. Cahill, C. M. (2004). Same-sex marriage, slippery slope rhetoric and the politics of disgust: A critical perspective on contemporary family discourse and the incest taboo. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 1543-1611.
5. Cohen, C. J. (1997). Punks, bulldaggers and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3, 437-465. doi:.
6. Cott, N. F. (2000). Public vows: A history of marriage and the nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Crehan, M. G., & Rickenbacker, K. (2006-07). The changing debate on same-sex marriage in the United States. Michigan Feminist Studies, 20, 1-17.
8. Curtis, M. K., & Gilreath, S. (2008). Tranforming teenagers into oral sex felons: The persistence of the crime against nature after Lawrence v. Texas. Wake Forest Law Review, 43, 155-221.
9. Editor & Publisher international Yearbook. (2008). New York: Editor & Publisher Co.
10. Eidelman, S., Crandall, C., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765-775. doi:.
11. Farrow, K. (2007). Is gay marriage anti-Black? Retrieved from on December 16, 2010.
12. Fingerhut, A. W., Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. (2011). Same-sex marriage: The social and psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 225-241. doi:.
13. Friedrich, J. (2005). Naturalistic fallacy errors in lay interpretations of psychological science: Data and reflections on the Rind, Tromovitch and Baserman (1998) controversy. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 59-70. doi:.
14. Girgis, S., George, R., & Anderson, R. T. (2010). What is marriage? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34, 245-287.
15. Greene, B. (2009). The use and abuse of religious beliefs in dividing and conquering between socially marginalized groups: The same-sex marriage debate. American Psychologist, 64, 698-709. doi:.
16. Gunson, J. S. (2010). "More natural but less normal": Reconsidering medicalisation and agency through women's accounts of menstrual suppression. Social Science & Medicine, 71(7), 1324-1331. doi:.
17. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691-698. doi:.
18. Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2009). Essentialism and attribution of monstrosity in racist discourse: Right-wing Internet postings about Africans and Jews. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 411-425. doi:.
19. In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, 183 P. 3d 384, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683, 2008 Cal. LEXIS 5247 (2008).
20. Johnson, G. (2009). We've heard this before: The legacy of interracial marriage bans and the implications for today's marriage equality debates. Vermont Law Review, 34, 277-289.
21. Kitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. (2004) Social advocacy for equal marriage: The politics of 'rights' and the psychology of 'mental health'. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4, 173-194. doi:.
22. Lewis, G. B. & Gossett, C. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same-sex marriage: The case of California, Politics & Policy, 30, 4-30. doi:.
23. Li, X., & Liu, X. (2010). Framing and coverage of same-sex marriage in U.S. newspapers. Harvard Journal of Communications, 21, 72-91. doi:.
24. Locke, A. (2009). 'Natural versus taught': Competing discourses in antenatal breastfeeding workshops. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 435-446. doi:.
25. Lock, M., & Kaufert, P. A. (Eds.) (1998). Pragmatic women and body politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Martin, K. A., & Kazyak, E. (2009). Hetero-romantic love and heterosexiness in children's G-rated films. Gender & Society, 23, 315-336. doi:.
27. McMillan, J. (2004). Doing it by the book: Natural tales of marriage and sex in contemporary Chinese marriage manuals. Sex Education, 4(3), 203-215. doi:.
28. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies (Working Paper No. 189). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
29. Montgomery, S., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Privileged allies: Resistance to heteronormativity and lesbian and gay rights activism. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 162-177.
30. National Conference of State Legislatures (2011). Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships. Retrieved from on October 29, 2011.
31. Newman, S. A. (2004). Use and abuse of social science in the same-sex marriage debate. The New York Law School Law Review, 49, 537-560.
32. Novkov, J. (2008). The miscegenation/same-sex marriage analogy: What can we learn from legal history? Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 345-386.
33. Pascoe, P. (2009). What comes naturally: Miscegenation law and the making of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Pratto, F. & Stewart, A. L. (2012). Group dominance and the half-blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 28-45.
35. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance, (Ed.), Pleasure & danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267-319). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36. Samar, V. J. (2005). Privacy and the debate over same-sex marriage versus unions. DePaul Law Review, 54, 783-804.
37. Semetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93-109. doi:.
38. Somerville, S. (2005). Queer Loving. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 11, 355-370. doi:.
39. Sullivan-Blum, C. R. (2006). "The natural order of creation": Naturalizing discourses in the Christian same-sex marriage debate. Anthropologica, 48, 203-215. doi:.
40. Tiefer, L. (1995). Sexual biology and the symbolism of the natural. In Tiefer, L. (Ed.), Sex is not a natural act and other essays (pp. 31-40). Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, Inc.
41. van Zyl, M. (2011). Are same-sex marriages unAfrican? Same-sex relationships and belonging in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 335-357. doi:.
42. Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, Revised Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.