Group Dominance and the Half-Blindness of Privilege

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-45

  Pratto, Felicia ^a   Stewart, Andrew L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL POLICY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84858659459     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01734.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bovenkerk, F., Gras, M. J. I., & Ramsoedh, D. (1994). Discrimination against migrant workers and ethnic minorities in access to employment in the Netherlands. International Migration Papers, 4. Geneva: Employment Department, International Labour Office.
2. Bullock, H. (1999). Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middle-class and welfare recipient attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2059-2082. doi:.
3. Case, K. A., Kanenberg, H., Erich, S. A., & Tittsworth, J. (2012). Transgender inclusion in university non-discrimination statements: Challenging gender-conforming privilege through student activism. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 145-161.
4. Coston, B. M., & Kimmel, M. (2012). Seeing privilege where it isn't: Marginalized masculinities and the intersectionality of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 97-111.
5. Devos, T., & Banaji, M. (2005). American = White Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466. doi:.
6. DuBois, W. E. B. (1897). The strivings of the Negro people. Atlantic Monthly, 80, 194-198.
7. Eibach, R., & Ehrlinger, J. (2006). "Keep your eyes on the prize:" Reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 66-77. doi:.
8. Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women's objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338-357. doi:.
9. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:.
10. Guimond, S. (2008). Psychological similarities and differences between men and women across cultures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 495-510. doi:.
11. Hartmann, D., Gerteis, J., & Croll, P. R. (2009). An empirical assessment of whiteness theory. Social Problems, 56, 403-424. doi:.
12. Hegarty, P., & Chryssochoou, X. (2005). Why 'our' policies set the standard more than 'theirs': Category norms and generalization between European Union countries. Social Cognition, 23, 507-544. doi:.
13. Hegarty, P. J., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723-735. doi:.
14. Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49-71. doi:.
15. Houston, D. M., & Andreopoulou, A. (2003). Tests of both corollaries of social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis in real group settings. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 357-370. doi:.
16. Kahn, K.B., Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 591-604. doi:.
17. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153. doi:.
18. Leach, C. W. (2002). Democracy's dilemma: Explaining racial inequality in egalitarian societies. Sociological Forum, 17, 681-696. doi:.
19. Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Petersen, A. (2007). Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 191-204. doi:.
20. Leach, C.W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). "Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate": The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker (Ed.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029-1064. doi:.
22. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies. Working Paper No. 189. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
23. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697. doi:.
24. Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 303-328.
25. Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environment composition on subjective well-being in African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 735-751. doi:.
26. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391. doi:.
27. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). San Diego: Academic Press. doi:.
28. Pratto, F., & Hegarty, P. (2000). The political psychology of reproductive strategies. Psychological Science, 11, 57-62. doi:.
29. Pratto, F., Hegarty, P., & Korchmaros, J. (2008). Who gets stereotyped? How communication practices and category norms lead people to stereotype particular people and groups. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.) Stereotype dynamics (pp. 299-319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
30. Pratto, P., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi:.
31. Pratto, F., Korchmaros, J., & Hegarty, P. (2007). When race and gender go without saying. Social Cognition, 25, 241-247. doi:.
32. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. doi:.
33. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316-320. doi:.
34. Ridgeway, C. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655. doi:.
35. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tropp, L. R. Stout, A. M., Boatswain, A., Wright, S. C., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2006). Trust and acceptance in response to references to group membership: Minority and majority perspectives on cross-group interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 769-794. doi:.
37. Vorauer, J. D., & Sakamoto, Y. (2008). Who cares what the outgroup thinks? Testing an information search model of the importance individuals accord to an outgroup member's view of them during intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1467-1480.
38. Walton, G., & Cohen, G. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456-467. doi:.