“More natural but less normal”: Reconsidering medicalisation and agency through women’s accounts of menstrual suppression

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1324-1331

  Gunson, Jessica Shipman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agency; Australia; Gender; Medicalisation; Menstruation; Reproductive technologies; USA

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE USE; DECISION MAKING; GENDER ISSUE; WOMENS HEALTH;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MENSTRUATION; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES;

AUSTRALIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956344765     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.041     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andrist L.C., Hoyt A., Weinstein D., McGibbon C. The need to bleed: women's attitudes and beliefs about menstrual suppression. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2004, 16(1):32-38.
2. Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 1995, 17(3):393-404.
3. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals & National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health Choosing when to menstruate: the role of extended contraception. ARHP clinical proceedings: A special joint issue from the association of reproductive health professionals and national association of nurse practitioners in women's health 2003, May 2, 2003.
4. Bagnall D. Cycle killer 2003, 46. The Bulletin, Sydney, (121), pp. 60-61.
5. Bauman Z. Modernity and ambivalence 1991, Polity Press, Cambridge.
6. Bobel C. " Our revolution has style": contemporary menstrual product activists " doing feminism" in the third wave. Sex Roles 2006, 54(5):331-345.
7. Bransen E. Has menstruation been medicalised? Or will it never happen. Sociology of Health and Illness 1992, 14(1):98-110.
8. Clarke A.E., Shim J.K., Mamo L., Fosket J.R., Fishman J.R. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review 2003, 68(2):161-185.
9. Clarke A.E., Shim J.K. Medicalization and biomedicalization revisited: technoscience and transformations of health, illness and biomedicine. Salute e Società 2009, EN2:33.
10. Conrad P. Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology 1992, 18:209-232.
11. Conrad P. The medicalization of society 2007, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
12. Coutinho E.M. Is menstruation obsolete? How suppressing menstruation can help women who suffer from anemia, endometriosis, or P.M.S 1999, University Press, Oxford.
13. Doyal L. What makes women sick: Gender and the political economy of health 1995, MacMillan, London.
14. Doyal L., Pennell I. The political economy of health 1979, Pluto Press, London.
15. Duramed Pharmaceuticals Seasonale brochure 2004, viewed September 16, 2004. http://www.seasonale.com/pdfs/Seasonale_Brochure.pdf.
16. Ehrenreich B., English D. For her own good: 150 years of experts, advice to women 1979, Pluto Press, London.
17. Ema Tuesday, September 09, 2003: Seasonale proves the earth is flat - part I 2003, viewed February 3, 2006. http://thewelltimedperiod.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_thewelltimedperiod_archive.html.
18. Foucault M. The birth of the clinic 1973, Tavistock, London.
19. Foucault M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 1980, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
20. Fried J. Period peace: A new pill going on sale in the US gives women just four periods a year 2003, The Guardian, London, December 12, 20036.
21. Glasier A.F., Smith K.B., van der Spuy Z.M., Ho P.C., Cheng L., Dada K., et al. Amenorrhea associated with contraception: an international study on acceptability. Contraception 2003, 67(1):1-8.
22. Gunson J.S. Evolutionary cycles: menstrual suppression in the media. Feminist Media Studies 2006, 6(2):226-230.
23. Gunson, J. S. (2007). The trouble with white pants: medicalisation and agency in the context of menstrual suppression, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Social Sciences, The University of Adelaide.
24. Hitchcock C.L., Prior J.C. Evidence about extending the duration of oral contraceptive use to suppress menstruation. Women's Health Issues 2004, 14(6):201-211.
25. Illich I. Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health 1975, Marion Boyars, London.
26. Kavanagh A.M., Broom D.H. Embodied risk: my body, myself?. Social Science & Medicine 1998, 46(3):437-444.
27. Lee S. Health and Sickness: the meaning of menstruation and premenstrual syndrome in women's lives. Sex Roles 2002, 46(1-2):25-35.
28. Pragmatic women and body politics 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Lock, P.A. Kaufert (Eds.).
29. Lupton D. 'Foucault and the medicalisation critique'. Foucault, health and medicine 1997, 94-110. Routledge, London. A. Petersen, R. Bunton (Eds.).
30. McNay L. Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory 2000, Polity Press, Cambridge.
31. McNay L. Agency and experience: gender as a lived relation. The Sociological Review 2004, 52(s2):173-190.
32. Metzl J.M., Herzig R.M. Medicalisation in the 21st century: introduction. The Lancet 2007, 369(9562):697-698.
33. Miller L. No period 2003, viewed February 7, 2006. http://www.noperiod.com.
34. Neergaard L. Grumpy? Must be that time of year again 2003, The Vancouver Sun, Vancouver, September 6, 20031.
35. O'Grady K. Is menstruation obsolete?. Thirdspace 2002, 2(1):1-5.
36. Oinas E. Medicalisation by whom? Accounts of menstruation conveyed by young women and medical experts in medical advisory columns. Sociology of Health and Illness 1998, 20(1):52-70.
37. Patton C. Bullets, balance, or both: medicalisation in HIV treatment. The Lancet 2007, 369(9562):706-707.
38. Pickersgill M. Between soma and society: neuroscience and the ontology of psychopathy. BioSocieties 2009, 4:45-60.
39. Purdy L. Medicalization, medical necessity, and feminist medicine. Bioethics 2001, 15(3):248-261.
40. Rako S. No more periods: The blessings of the curse 2003, viewed June 17, 2006. http://www.susanrako.com/no_more_periods1.htm.
41. Riessman C.K. Women and medicalization: a new perspective. Social Policy 1983, 14(1):3-18.
42. Ripper M. " A comparison of the effect of the menstrual cycle and the social week on mood, sexual interest, and self assessed performance" Menstruation, health and illness 1991, Taylor and Francis Inc, New York. D.L. Taylor, N.F. Woods (Eds.).
43. Rose N. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self 1989, Routledge, London.
44. Rose N. Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society 1993, 22(3):283-299.
45. Rose N. Beyond medicalisation. The Lancet 2007, 369(9562):700-702.
46. Rose N. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century 2007, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
47. Saltus R. Pike describes redesigned oral contraceptive to decrease cancer risk. Harvard Public Health NOW 2003, 1-3. May 16, 2003.
48. Schwartz J.L., Creinin M.D., Pymar H.C. The trimonthly combination oral contraceptive regimen: is it cost effective?. Contraception 1999, 60(5):263-267.
49. SHine S.A. SHine SA: the pill (combined oral contraceptive pill) Retrieved February 8, 2010 from. http://www.shinesa.org.au/go/information-and-resources/choose-a-topic/contraception/the-pill.
50. Smart B. Facing modernity 1999, Sage, London.
51. Society for Menstrual Cycle Research Menstruation is not a disease Retrieved February 8, 2010 from. http://menstruationresearch.org/position-statements/menstrual-supression-2007.
52. Strassmann B.I. Menstrual cycling and breast cancer: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine 1999, 8(2):193-202.
53. Thomas S.L., Ellertson C. Nuisance or natural and healthy: should monthly menstruation be optional for women?. The Lancet 2000, 355(9207):922-924.
54. Tomes N. Patient empowerment and the dilemmas of late-modern medicalisation. The Lancet 2007, 369(9562):698-700.
55. Zola I.K. Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociological Review 1972, 20(4):487-504.