Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 251-267

  Egbert, Gary D ^a   Kelbert, Anna ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geomagnetic induction; Inverse theory; Magnetotelluric; Numerical solutions

Indexed keywords

ADJOINTS; COMPUTER CODES; CONJUGATE GRADIENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC INVERSE PROBLEMS; FORWARD PROBLEM; FUNCTIONALS; GAUSS-NEWTON; GENERAL THEORY; GEOMAGNETIC INDUCTION; GEOPHYSICAL DATA; GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS; GRADIENT BASED; INVERSE THEORY; INVERSION METHODS; JACOBIANS; MAGNETOTELLURIC; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODULAR SYSTEM; NONLINEAR MAPPINGS; NUMERICAL INVERSION; NUMERICAL SOLUTION;

COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS; CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ELECTROMAGNETISM; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETOTELLURICS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; GEOMAGNETISM; INVERSE PROBLEM; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; NUMERICAL METHOD; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84858618794     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05347.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Akin, J.E., 2003. Object-Oriented Programming via Fortran 90/95, Vol. 1317, Issue 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 348pp.
2. Alumbaugh, D.L. & Newman, G.A., 1997. Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion: II. Analysis of a crosswell electromagnetic experiment, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 355-363, doi:.
3. Alumbaugh, D.L., Newman, G.A., Prevost, L. & Shadid, J.N., 1996. Three-dimensional wide band electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers, Radio Sci., 33, 1-23.
4. Avdeev, D.B., 2005. Three-dimensional electromagnetic modelling and inversion from theory to application, Surv. Geophys., 26(6), 767-799.
5. Avdeev, D.B. & Avdeeva, A., 2009. 3D magnetotelluric inversion using a limited-memory quasi-Newton optimization, Geophysics, 74(3), F45-F57, doi:.
6. Bennett, A.F., 2002. Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Caldwell, T.G., Bibby, H.M. & Brown, C., 2004. The magnetotelluric phase tensor, Geophys. J. Int., 158(2), 457-469.
8. Chua, B., 2001. An inverse ocean modeling system, Ocean Modelling, 3, 137-165, doi:.
9. Commer, M. & Newman, G.A., 2008. New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 513-535, doi:.
10. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L. & Constable, C.G., 1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52(3), 289-300.
11. Egbert, G.D., 1994. A new stochastic process on the sphere: application to characterization of long-period global scale external sources, in 14th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth and Moon, Brest, France.
12. Egbert, G.D., 2002. Processing and interpretation of electromagnetic induction array data, Surv. Geophys., 23(2-3), 207-249.
13. Egbert, G.D. & Bennett, A.F., 1996. Data assim, Modern Approaches to Data Assimilation in Ocean Modeling, p. 147, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
14. de Groot-Hedlin, C., 1995. Inversion for regional 2-D resistivity structure in the presence of galvanic scatterers, Geophys. J. Int., 122(3), 877-888, doi:.
15. de Groot-Hedlin, C. & Constable, S.C., 2004. Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts, Geophysics, 69(1), 78, doi:.
16. Haber, E., 2005. Quasi-Newton methods for large-scale electromagnetic inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 21(1), 305-323.
17. Kelbert, A., 2006. Geophysical inverse theory applied to reconstruction of large-scale heterogeneities in electrical conductivity of Earth's mantle, PhD thesis, Cardiff University.
18. Kelbert, A., Egbert, G.D. & Schultz, A., 2008. Non-linear conjugate gradient inversion for global EM induction: resolution studies, Geophys. J. Int., 173(2), 365-381, doi:.
19. Kelbert, A., Schultz, A. & Egbert, G.D., 2009. Global electromagnetic induction constraints on transition-zone water content variations, Nature, 460(7258), 1003-1006, doi:.
20. de Lugao, P., Portniaguine, O. & Zhdanov, M.S., 1997. Fast and stable two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49(11-12), 1437-1454.
21. McGillivray, P.R., Oldenburg, D.W., Ellis, R.G. & Habashy, T.M., 1994. Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem, Geophys. J. Int., 116(1), 1-4, doi:.
22. Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1993. 3-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophys. J. Int., 115(1), 215-229.
23. Mackie, R.L., Smith, J.T. & Madden, T.R., 1994. 3-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite-difference equations-the magnetotelluric example, Radio Sci., 29(4), 923-935.
24. Marquardt, D.W., 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 11, 431-441.
25. Nedelec, J.C., 1980. Mixed finite elements in R3, Numer. Math., 35(3), 315-341, doi:.
26. Newman, G.A. & Alumbaugh, D.L., 1997. Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 345-354, doi:.
27. Newman, G.A. & Alumbaugh, D.L., 2000. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 410-424.
28. Newman, G.A. & Boggs, P.T., 2004. Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 20, 151-170, doi:.
29. Newman, G.A. & Hoversten, G.M., 2000. Solution strategies for two- and three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 16, 1357-1375, doi:.
30. Nocedal, J. & Wright, S.J., 1999. Numerical Optimization, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
31. Pankratov, O. & Kuvshinov, A., 2010. General formalism for the efficient calculation of derivatives of EM frequency-domain responses and derivatives of the misfit, Geophys. J. Int., 181(1), 229-249.
32. Parker, R.L., 1994. Geophysical Inverse Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
33. Rodi, W.L., 1976. A technique for improving the accuracy of finite element solutions for magnetotelluric data, Geophys. J. Int., 44(2), 483-506, doi:.
34. Rodi, W.L. & Mackie, R.L., 2001. Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion, Geophysics, 66(1), 174-187.
35. Rodrigue, G. & White, D., 2001. A vector finite element time-domain method for solving Maxwell's equations on unstructured hexahedral grids, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23(3), 683, doi:.
36. Sasaki, Y., 2001. Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC, J. appl. Geophys., 46, 45-54, doi:.
37. Schmücker, U., 2003. Horizontal spatial gradient sounding and geomagnetic depth sounding in the period range of daily variation, in Protokoll Aber das Kolloquium elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung, Kolloquium: Konigstein, pp. 228-237.
38. Schmücker, U., 2004. Multivariate magneto-variational soundings (MVS), in Proceedings of the 17th EM Induction Workshop, Hyderabad.
39. Semenov, V.Y. & Shuman, V.N., 2009. Impedances for induction soundings of the Earth's mantle, Acta Geophys., 58(4), 527-542.
40. Siripunvaraporn, W. & Egbert, G.D., 2000. An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 65(3), 791-803.
41. Siripunvaraporn, W. & Egbert, G.D., 2007. Data space conjugate gradient inversion for 2-D magnetotelluric data, Geophys. J. Int., 170, 986-994, doi:.
42. Siripunvaraporn, W. & Egbert, G., 2009. WSINV3DMT: vertical magnetic field transfer function inversion and parallel implementation, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 173(3-4), 317-329, doi:.
43. Siripunvaraporn, W., Egbert, G.D. & Lenbury, Y., 2002. Numerical accuracy of magnetotelluric modeling: a comparison of finite difference approximations, Earth Planets Space, 54(6), 721-725.
44. Siripunvaraporn, W., Uyeshima, M. & Egbert, G.D., 2004. Three-dimensional inversion for Network-Magnetotelluric data, Earth Planets Space, 56(9), 893-902.
45. Siripunvaraporn, W., Egbert, G.D., Lenbury, Y. & Uyeshima, M., 2005. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion: data-space method, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 150(1-3), 3-14.
46. Smith, J.T., 1996. Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields: 1. Properties and error analysis, Geophysics, 61(5), 1308-1318.
47. Smith, T., Hoversten, M., Gasperikova, E. & Morrison, F., 1999. Sharp boundary inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data, Geophys. Prospect., 47(4), 469-486, doi:.
48. Spitzer, K., 1998. The three-dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 736-746, doi:.
49. Uyeshima, M. & Schultz, A., 2000. Geomagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: a new three-dimensional forward solver using a conservative staggered-grid finite difference method, Geophys. J. Int., 140(3), 636-650.
50. Yee, K., 1966. Numerical solution of inital boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 14, 302-307, doi:.
51. Zhang, J., Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1995. 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophysics, 60(5), 1313-1325.