Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part I: Properties and error analysis

Geophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1308-1318

  Smith, J Torquil ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

DIVERGENCE FREE MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; NYQUIST WAVENUMBERS; STAGGERED FINITE DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; STAGGERED GRID;

EID: 0030236011     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444054     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arakawa, A., 1966, Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: Two dimensional incompressible flow, Part 1: J. Comput. Phys., 1, 119-143.
2. Bryan, K., 1969, A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the world ocean: J. Comput. Phys., 4, 347-376.
3. d'Erceville, I., and Kunetz, G., 1962, The effect of a fault on the Earth's natural electromagnetic field: Geophysics, 5, 651-665.
4. Harrington, R. F., 1961, Time-harmonic Electromagnetic Fields: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
5. Jones, F. W., and Pascoe, L. J., 1971, The perturbation of alternating geomagnetic fields by three-dimensional conductivity inhomogeneities: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 27, 479-485.
6. Longmire, C. L., 1975, State of art in IEMP and SGEMP calculations: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 22, 2340-2344.
7. Mackie, R. L., and Madden, T. R., 1993, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations: Part II: Conjugate direction relaxation solution: Geophysics, 58, 1052-1057.
8. Mackie, R. L., Madden, T. R., and Wa'nnamaker, P. E., 1993, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations: Part I: Theory and comparisons Io integral equation solution: Geophysics, 58, 215-226.
9. Madden, T. R., and Mackie, R. L., 1989, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling and inversion: Proc. IEEE., 77, 318-333.
10. Morse, P. M., and Feshbach, H., 1953, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Part I: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
11. Smith, J. T. 1996, Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields: Part II. Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator: Geophysics, 61, 1319-1324.
12. Smith, J. T., and Booker, J. R., 1990, 3-D forward modeling using sparse matrix methods: Tenth Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, IAGA Working Group 1-2, Ensenada, Mexico.
13. Vischer, P. B., 1989, Discrete formulation of Maxwell equations: Computers in Physics, March, 42-45.
14. Wang, T., and Hohmann, G. W., 1993, A finite-difference solution for three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling: Geophysics, 58, 797-809.
15. Wannamaker, P. E., 1991, Advances in modeling three-dimensional magnetotelluric responses using integral equations: Geophysics, 56, 1716-1728.
16. Weaver, J. T., Le Quang, B. V., and Fischer, G., 1986, A comparison of analytical and numerical results for a 2-D control model in electromagnetic induction: II. E-polarization calculations: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 87, 917-948.
17. Weiland, T., 1985, Three-dimensional resonator mode computation by finite difference method: IEEE Trans. Magn., 21 21, 2340-2343.
18. Yee, K. S., 1966, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media: IEEE Trans. Anten. Propag., 14, 302-307.
19. Zhdanov, M. C., Barenshov, E. M., Golubev, N. G., and, Kruilov, B. A., 1990, Metodui Modelirobaniya Elektromagnitnuih Polei: Materialui Mezhdunarodnogo Proekta COMMENT (Modeling Methods for Electromagnetic Fields: International Materials Project COMMENI): Nauka, Moscow.