General formalism for the efficient calculation of derivatives of EM frequency-domain responses and derivatives of the misfit

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 229-249

  Pankratov, Oleg ^a   Kuvshinov, Alexei ^b  

^a PUSHKOV INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM   (Russian Federation)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic theory; Geomagnetic induction; Inverse theory; Magnetotelluric

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETISM; INVERSE ANALYSIS; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 77952572604     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04470.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Avdeev DB, Avdeeva AD. 3D magnetotelluric inversion using a limited-memory quasi-Newton optimization. Geophysics 2009, 74:45-57.
2. Banks R. Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 1969, 17:457-487.
3. Dmitriev VI, Berdichevsky MN. A generalized impedance model. Phys. Solid Earth 2002, 38:897-903.
4. Dorn O, Bertete-Aquirre H, Berryman JG, Papanicolaou GC. A nonlinear inversion method for 3-D electromagnetic imaging using adjoint fields. Inverse Problems 1999, 15:1523-1558.
5. Haber E. Quasi-Newton methods for large-scale electromagnetic inverse problems. Inverse Problems 2005, 21:305-323.
6. Haber E, Oldenburg D, Shekhtman R. Inversion of 3D time domain electromagnetic data. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 171:550-564.
7. Kelbert A, Egbert G, Schultz A. Non-linear conjugate gradient inversion for global EM induction: resolution studies. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 173:365-381.
8. Mackie RL, Madden T. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophys. J. Int. 1993, 115:215-229.
9. McGillivray PR, Oldenburg DW, Ellis RG, Habashy TM. Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem. Geophys. J. Int. 1994, 116:1-4.
10. Newman GA, Alumbaugh DL. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 140:410-424.
11. Newman GA, Commer M. New advances in three-dimensional transient electromagnetic inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 160:5-32.
12. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization 2006, Springer, New York
13. Olsen N. The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from 3 to 720 hr. Geophys. J. Int. 1998, 133:298-308.
14. Pellerin L, Johnston JM, Hohmann GW. Three-dimensional inversion of electromagnetic data. 1993, 360-363. in, Washington, DC, Soc. Exploration Geophysics
15. Rodi W, Mackie RL. Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics 2000, 66:174-187.
16. Schmucker U. Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the south-western United States. Bull. Scripps Inst. Ocean., Univ. Calif. 1970, 13:1-165.
17. Schmucker U. Horizontal special gradient sounding and geomagnetic sounding in the period range of daily variation. Protokoll uber das Kolloquium electromagnetische Tiefenforschung 2003, 20:228-237.
18. Semenov VYu, Vozár J, Shuman V. A new approach to gradient geomagnetic sounding. Izvestiya, Phys. Solid Earth 2007, 43(7):592-596.
19. Zhdanov M. Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems. Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics 2002, 36. in, Vol, Elsevier, Amsterdam