The three-dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 134, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 736-746

  Spitzer, K ^a,b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Geowissenschaftliche G   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

EID: 0032415483     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00592.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barker, R.D., 1979. Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 59, 123-129.
2. Boerner, D.E. & West, G.F., 1989. Fréchet derivatives and single scattering theory, Geophys. J. Int., 98, 385-390.
3. Brewitt-Taylor, C.R. & Weaver, J.T., 1976. On the finite difference solution of two-dimensional induction problems, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 47, 375-396.
4. Geselowitz, D.B., 1971. An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-18, 39-41.
5. Hestenes, M.R. & Stiefel, E. 1952. Method of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, 49, 409-436.
6. Lanczos, C., 1961. Linear Differential Operators, Van Nostrand, London.
7. Li, Y. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1991. Aspects of charge accumulation in d.c. resistivity experiments, Geophys. Prospect., 39, 803-826.
8. Loke, M.H. & Barker, R.D., 1996. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion, Geophys. Prospect., 44, 499-523.
9. McGillivray, P.R. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1990. Methods for calculating Fréchet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: a comparative study, Geophys. Prospect., 38, 499-524.
10. Noel, M. & Xu, B., 1991. Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study, Geophys. J. Int., 107, 95-102.
11. Oldenburg, D.W., 1978. The interpretation of direct current resistivity measurements, Geophysics, 43, 610-625.
12. Park, S.K. & Van, G.P., 1991. Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes, Geophysics, 56, 951-960.
13. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1986. Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press.
14. Sasaki, Y., 1994. 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite element method, Geophysics, 59, 1839-1848.
15. Shima, H., 1992. 2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data, Geophysics, 57, 1270-1281.
16. Smith, N.C. & Vozoff, K. 1984. Two-dimensional DC resistivity inversion for dipole-dipole data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, GE-22, 21-28.
17. Spitzer, K., 1995. A 3D finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using conjugate gradient methods, Geophys. J. Int., 123, 903-914.
18. Spitzer, K. & Chouteau, M., 1996. Investigations on the apparent resistivity, sensitivity, and IP frequency effect for crosswell arrangements in three-dimensional environments, The Role of In-Mine Geophysics in Resource Evaluation, extended abstracts, 66th Annual Mtng SEG, Denver, CO.
19. Spitzer, K. & Kümpel, H.-J., 1997. 3D FD resistivity modeling and sensitivity analyses applied to a highly resistive phonolitic body, Geophys. Prospect., 45, 963-982.
20. Weller, A., Gruhne, M., Seichter, M. & Börner, F.D., 1996. Monitoring hydraulic experiments by complex conductivity tomography, E. J. Env. Eng. Geophys., 1, 209-228.