Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion - I. Theory

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 345-354

  Newman, G A ^a   Alumbaugh, D L ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic modelling; Inversion; Tomography

Indexed keywords

DATA INVERSION; ELECTROMAGNETIC DATA; INVERSION; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030834086     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01559.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alumbaugh, D.L. & Newman, G.A., 1996. Three-dimensional massively parallel inversion - II. Analysis of a cross-well EM experiment, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 355-363 (this issue).
2. Alumbaugh, D.L., Newman, G.A., Prevost, L. & Shadid, J.N., 1996. Three-dimensional wide band electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers, Radio Science, 31, 1-23.
3. Farquharson, C.G. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1996. Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem, Geophys. J. Int., 126, 235-252.
4. Gropp, W., Lusk, E. & Skjellum, A., 1995. Using MPI-portable parallel programming with the message-passing interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Habashy, T.M., Torres-Verdin, C. & Oristaglio, M.L., 1995. An overview of recent advances in inversion of large-scale electromagnetic data, in Int. Symp. on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, expanded abstracts.
6. Hestenes, M.R. & Stiefel, E., 1952. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, 49, 409-435.
7. McGillivray, P.R. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1990. Methods for calculating Fréchet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem, Geophys. Prospect., 38, 499-524.
8. Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1993. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophys. J. Int., 115, 215-229.
9. Menke, W., 1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.
10. Newman, G.A., Hohmann, G.W. & Anderson, W.L., 1986. Transient electromagnetic responses of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth, Geophysics, 51, 1608-1627.
11. Oldenburg, D.W., 1990. Inversion of electromagnetic data: an overview of new techniques, Surv. Geophys., 11, 231-270.
12. Park, S.K., 1983. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling and inversion, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA.
13. Tikhonov, A.N. & Arsenin, V.Y., 1977. Solutions to Ill-posed Problems, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
14. Torres-Verdin, C. & Habashy, T.M., 1994. Rapid 2.5-dimensional forward modeling and inversion via a new nonlinear scattering approximation, Radio Sci., 29, 1051-1079.
15. Torres-Verdin, C. & Habashy, T, M., 1995. A two step linear inversion of two dimensional electrical conductivity, IEEE Trans. Antenna Propagat., 43, 405-415.
16. Zhang, J. Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1995. Three-dimensional resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophysics, 60, 1313-1325.
17. Zhdanov, M.S. & Fang, S., 1995. 3D electromagnetic inversion based on the quasi-linear approximation, in Int. Symp. on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, expanded abstracts.