The influence of the dynamic transformation of a sliding lever on aiming errors

Neuroscience

Volumn 207, Issue , 2012, Pages 137-147

  Heuer, H ^a   Sulzenbruck S ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Error propagation; Hand movements; Inertial anisotropy; Internal model; Joint impedance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANISOTROPY; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC TRANSFORMATION; DYNAMICS; ERROR; ERROR PROPAGATION; FEMALE; GENERAL DEVICE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; LOADING TEST; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SLIDING FIRST ORDER LEVER; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858444035     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.01.035     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams R.A., Landgraf J.Z. Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Percept Psychoph 1990, 47:349-359.
2. Apker G.A., Buneo C.A. Contribution of execution noise to arm movement variability in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 2012, 107:90-102.
3. Apker G.A., Darling T.K., Buneo C.A. Interacting noise sources shape patterns of arm movement variability in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104:2654-2666.
4. Bizzi E., Accornero N., Chapple W., Hogan N. Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. J Neurosci 1984, 4:2738-2744.
5. Bock O. Load compensation in human goal-directed movements. Behav Brain Res 1990, 41:167-177.
6. Bock O. Early stages of load compensation in human aimed arm movements. Behav Brain Res 1993, 55:61-68.
7. Bock O., Arnold K. Error accumulation and error correction in sequential pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 1993, 95:111-117.
8. Bock O., Eckmiller R. Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Exp Brain Res 1986, 62:451-458.
9. Carrozzo M., McIntyre J., Zago M., Lacquaniti F. Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 1999, 129:201-210.
10. Carrozzo M., Stratta F., McIntyre J., Lacquaniti F. Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors. Exp Brain Res 2002, 147:426-436.
11. Dounskaia N., Nogueira K.G., Swinnen S.P., Drummond E. Limitations on coupling of bimanual movements caused by arm dominance: when the muscle homology principle fails. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103:2027-2038.
12. Flanagan J.R., Lolley S. The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 2001, 21:1361-1369.
13. Flanagan J.R., Wing A.M. The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 1995, 105:455-464.
14. Franklin D.W., Osu R., Burdet E., Kawato M., Milner T.E. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamic models. J Neurophysiol 2003, 90:3270-3282.
15. Fujii S., Kudo K., Shinya M., Ohtsuki T., Oda S. Wrist muscle activity during rapid unimanual tapping with a drumstick in drummers and nondrummers. Mot Contr 2009, 13:237-250.
16. Gachoud J.P., Mounoud P., Hauert C.A., Viviani P. Motor strategies in lifting movements: a comparison of adult and child performance. J Mot Behav 1983, 15:202-216.
17. Gallagher A.G., McClure N., McGuigan J., Ritchie K., Sheehy N.P. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 1998, 30:617-620.
18. Gentili R., Cahouet V., Papaxanthis C. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field. Neuroscience 2007, 145:20-32.
19. Gordon A.M., Forssberg H., Johansson R.S., Westling G. Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 1991, 83:477-482.
20. Gordon J., Ghilardi M.F., Cooper S.E., Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 1994, 99:112-130.
21. Gordon J., Ghilardi M.F., Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 1994, 99:97-111.
22. Gottlieb G.L., Corcos D.M., Agarwal G.C. Organizing principles for single joint movements. I: a speed-insensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol 1989, 62:342-357.
23. Gribble P.L., Mullin L.I., Cothros N., Mattar A. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J Neurophysiol 2003, 89:2396-2405.
24. Hermsdörfer J., Marquardt C., Philipp J., Zierdt A., Nowak D., Glasauer S., Mai N. Moving weightless objects. Grip force control during microgravity. Exp Brain Res 2000, 132:52-64.
25. Heuer H. Control of the dominant and nondominant hand: exploitation and taming of nonmuscular forces. Exp Brain Res 2007, 178:363-373.
26. Heuer H., Sangals J. Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 1998, 119:224-236.
27. Heuer H., Sülzenbrück S. Trajectories in operating a hand-held tool. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009, 35:375-389.
28. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 1984, 56:550-564.
29. Krakauer J.W., Ghilardi M.F., Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:1026-1031.
30. Lackner J.R., DiZio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 1994, 72:299-313.
31. Lestienne F. Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res 1979, 35:407-418.
32. Messier J., Kalaska J.F. Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 1999, 125:139-152.
33. Osu R., Franklin D.W., Kato H., Gomi H., Domen K., Yoshioka T., Kawato M. Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:991-1004.
34. Pfann K.D., Corcos D.M., Moore C.G., Hasan Z. Circle-drawing movements at different speeds: role of intertial anisotropy. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:2399-2407.
35. Sainburg R.L. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 2002, 142:241-258.
36. Sainburg R.L., Kalakanis D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83:2661-2675.
37. Shadmehr R., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 1994, 14:3208-3224.
38. Smeets J.B.J., Erkelens C.J., Denier van der Gon J.J. Perturbations of fast goal-directed arm movements: different behavior of early and late EMG responses. J Mot Behav 1995, 27:77-88.
39. Sülzenbrück S., Heuer H. Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations. Exp Brain Res 2009, 195:153-165.
40. Sülzenbrück S., Heuer H. The trajectory of adaptation to the visuo-motor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers. Exp Brain Res 2010, 201:549-560.
41. Sülzenbrück S., Heuer H. Type of visual feedback during practice influences the precision of the acquired internal model of a complex visuo-motor transformation. Ergonomics 2011, 54:34-46.
42. Thaler L., Todd J.T. The use of head/eye-centered, hand-centered and allocentric representations for visually guided hand movements and perceptual judgements. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1227-1244.
43. Thaler L., Todd J.T. The control parameters used by the CNS to guide the hand depend on the visuo-motor task: evidence from visually guided pointing. Neuroscience 2009, 159:578-598.
44. Van Beers R.J., Haggard P., Wolpert D.M. The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91:1050-1063.
45. Van den Dobbelsteen J.J., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets. Exp Brain Res 2001, 138:279-287.
46. Vindras P., Desmurget P., Viviani P. Error parsing in visuomotor pointing reveals independent processing of amplitude and direction. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:1212-1224.
47. Vindras P., Viviani P. Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998, 24:569-591.
48. Vindras P., Viviani P. Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. Exp Brain Res 2002, 147:280-295.