Contribution of execution noise to arm movement variability in three-dimensional space

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 90-102

  Apker, Gregory A ^a   Buneo, Christopher A ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Execution; Planning; Reference frames; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXECUTION NOISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPACE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL SPACE; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ARM; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84255182649     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00495.2011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Apker GA, Darling TK, Buneo CA. Interacting noise sources shape patterns of arm movement variability in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 104: 2654-2666, 2010.
2. Berkinblit MB, Fookson OI, Smetanin B, Adamovich SV, Poizner H. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets. Exp Brain Res 107: 326-330, 1995.
3. Buneo CA, Boline J, Soechting JF, Poppele RE. On the form of the internal model for reaching. Exp Brain Res 104: 467-479, 1995.
4. Carrozzo M, McIntyre J, Zago M, Lacquaniti F. Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 129: 201-210, 1999.
5. Churchland MM, Afshar A, Shenoy KV. A central source of movement variability. Neuron 52: 1085-1096, 2006a.
6. Churchland MM, Yu BM, Ryu SI, Santhanam G, Shenoy KV. Neural variability in premotor cortex provides a signature of motor preparation. J Neurosci 26: 3697-3712, 2006b.
7. Contreras-Vidal JL, Buch ER. Effects of Parkinson's disease on visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 150: 25-32, 2003.
8. Darling WG, Miller GF. Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations. Exp Brain Res 93: 534-547, 1993.
9. Faisal AA, Selen LPJ, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 292-303, 2008.
10. Faisal AA, Wolpert DM. Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. J Neuro-physiol 101: 1901-1912, 2009.
11. Foley JM, Held R. Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues. Percept Psychophys 12: 263-268, 1972.
12. Franklin DW, So U, Burdet E, Kawato M. Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLos One 2: 2007.
13. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99: 97-111, 1994.
14. Hermsdorfer J, Goldenberg G. Ipsilesional deficits during fast diadochoki-netic hand movements following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 40: 2100-2115, 2002.
15. Khachiyan LG. Rounding of polytopes in the real number model of computation. Math Oper Res 21: 307-320, 1996.
16. Khachiyan LG, Todd MJ. On the complexity of approximating the maximal inscribed ellipsoid for a polytope. Math Program 61: 137-159, 1993.
17. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
18. Longstaff MG, Heath RA. Spiral drawing performance as an indicator of fine motor function in people with multiple sclerosis. Hum Mov Sci 25: 474-491, 2006.
19. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Droulez J, Lacquaniti F. Analysis of pointing errors reveals properties of data representations and coordinate transformations within the central nervous system. Neural Comput 12: 2823-2855, 2000.
20. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F. Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18: 8423-8435, 1998.
21. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F. Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 78: 1601-1618, 1997.
22. Morrison D. Multivariate Statistical Methods. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
23. Osborne LC, Lisberger SG, Bialek W. A sensory source for motor variation. Nature 437: 412-416, 2005.
24. Shi Y, Buneo CA. Exploring the role of sensor noise in movement variability. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Minneapolis, MN: IEEE, 2009, p. 4970-4973.
25. Soechting JF, Flanders M. Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62: 582-594, 1989.
26. Thaler L, Todd JT. The control parameters used by the CNS to guide the hand depend on the visuo-motor task: Evidence from visually guided pointing. Neuroscience 159: 578-598, 2009.
27. Thies SB, Tresadern PA, Kenney LP, Smith J, Howard D, Goulermas JY, Smith C, Rigby J. Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6: 2, 2009.
28. van Beers RJ. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron 63: 406-417, 2009.
29. van Beers RJ, Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 1137-1145, 2002a.
30. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM. The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 91: 1050-1063, 2004.
31. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neuro-physiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999.
32. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377, 1998.
33. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002b.
34. van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ. Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets. Exp Brain Res 138: 279-287, 2001.
35. Viguier A, Clement G, Trotter Y. Distance perception within near visual space. Perception 30: 115-124, 2001.
36. Vindras P, Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Viviani P. Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position. J Neurophysiol 79: 3290-3294, 1998.
37. Vindras P, Viviani P. Frames of reference and control parameters in visuo-manual pointing. J Exp Psychol Human 24: 569-591, 1998.