Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 392-397

  Lewis, Peter M ^a   Al Belooshi, Ali ^a   Olsen, Michael ^a   Schemitch, Emil H ^a   Waddell, James P ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Polyethylene; Total hip arthroplasty; Wear

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HIP PAIN; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DISEASES, DEVELOPMENTAL; CERAMICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEONECROSIS; POLYETHYLENE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950521031     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Schmalzried T.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Northfield M.R., et al. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80-A:54.
2. Bourne R.B., Barrack R., Rorabeck C.H., et al. Arthroplasty options for the young patient. Oxinium on cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:159.
3. Dorr L.D., Kane T.J., Conaty J.P. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger. A 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:255.
4. Kobayashi S., Eftekhar N.S., Terayama K., et al. Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 339:140.
5. Joshi A.B., Porter M.L., Trail I.A., et al. Long term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75-B:616.
6. Treacy R.B.C., McBryde C.W., Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87-B:167.
7. Sedel L. Total hip arthroplasty using a ceramic prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 379:3.
8. Skinner H.B. Ceramic bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop 1999, 369:83.
9. Barrack R.L., Burak C., Skinner H.B. Concerns about ceramics in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:73.
10. Nizard R., Sedel L., Hannouche D., et al. Alumina pairing in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005, 87-B:755.
11. Nizard R., Pourreyon D., Raould A., et al. Alumina-on alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:317.
12. Murphy S.B., Ecker T.M., Tannast M. Two to nine year clinical results of alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:97.
13. Bal B., Aleto T., Garino J.P., et al. Ceramic-on ceramic versus ceramic on polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: results of a multicenter prospective randomised study and update of modern ceramic total hip trials in the United States. Hip 2005, 15:129.
14. D'Antonio J., Capello W., Manley M., et al. Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. Five year results of a prospective randomised trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 436:164.
15. McMahon J.S., Waddell J.P., Morton J. Effect of short course indomethacin on heterotopic bone formation after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991, 6:259.
16. Alpert B., Waddell J.P., Morton J., et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in renal transplant patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 284:164.
17. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 1976, 121:20.
18. Greun T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. "Modes of Failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979, 141:17.
19. Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Comparative results of a distal modular sleeve, circumferential coating, and stiffness relief using the anatomic porous replacement II. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:419.
20. Mundy G.M., Esler C.N.A., Harper W.M. Primary hip replacement in young osteoarthritic patients: current practices in one UK region. Hip 2005, 15:159.
21. Joint Replacement Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2006. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/.
22. Hamadouche M., Boutin P., Daussange J., et al. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:69.
23. Bizot P., Hannouche D., Nizard R., et al. Hybrid alumina THA using a press fit metal backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six to eleven year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86-B:190.
24. Allain J., Roudot-Thoraval F., Delecrin J., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic head: a multicenter survivorship study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:825.
25. Masonis J.L., Bourne R.B., Ries M.D., et al. Zirconia femoral head fractures. A clinical and retrieval analysis. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:898.
26. Willert H.G., Buchorn G.H., Fayyazi A., et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87-A:28.
27. Delaunay C.P., Bonnomet F., Clavert P., et al. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:340.
28. Ziaee H., Daniel J., Datta A.K., et al. Trans-placental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. A controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:301.
29. Garcia-Cimbrelo E., Garcia-Rey E., Murcia-Mazón A., et al. Alumina-on-alumina in THA: a multicenter prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008, 466:309.
30. Tipper J.L., Ingham E., Hailey J.L., et al. Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieval Charnley hip prosthesis. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000, 11:117.
31. Garcia-Cimbrelo E., Cruz-Pardos A., Cordero J., et al. Low-friction arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old: 20-to 25-year results. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:825.
32. Sochart D.H. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 363:135.
33. Ohlin A., Selvik G. Socket wear assessment: a comparison of three different radiographic methods. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8:427.
34. Wroblewski B.M. Direction and rate of socket wear in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985, 67:757.
35. Martell J.M., Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79:1635.
36. Sychterz C.J., Yang A.M., McAuley J.P., et al. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional radiographic measurements of polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999, 1:117.
37. Barrack R.L., Lavernia C., Szuszczewicz E.S., et al. Radiographic wear measurements in a cementless metal-backed modular cobalt-chromium acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:820.
38. Ebramzadeh E., Sangiorgio S.N., Lattuada F., et al. Accuracy of measurement of polyethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A:2378.
39. Collier M.B., Kraay M.J., Rimnac C.M., et al. Evaluation of contemporary software methods used to quantify polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A:2410.
40. Geerdink C.H., Grimm B., Vencken W., et al. The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: a comparison of four computer-assisted methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008, 90:839.
41. Malchau H., Karrholm J., Wang Y.X., et al. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995, 66:418.
42. Valstar E.R., Vrooman H.A., Toksvig-Larsen S., et al. Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. J Biomech. 2000, 33:1593.
43. Bragdon C.R., Estok D.M., Malchau H., et al. Comparison of two digital radiostereometric analysis methods in the determination of femoral head penetration in a total hip replacement phantom. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:659.
44. Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D.O., et al. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:149.
45. Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D.O., et al. Unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes. Biomaterials 1999, 20:1463.
46. Jacobs C.A., Christensen C.P., Greenwald S.A., et al. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:2779.
47. Fisher J., Ingham E., Stone M.H. Alternative bearing couples in total hip replacements: solutions for young patients. Hip 2003, 13(Suppl 2):31.
48. Pollard T.C.B., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88-B:592.