Morphological characters and their use in pleurocarpous moss systematics

Pleurocarpous Mosses: Systematics and Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 227-246

  Hedenäs, Lars ^a  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055942183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420005592     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Akiyama, H. (1990a) A morphological study of branch development in mosses with special reference to pseudoparaphyllia. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo, 103: 269-282.
2. Akiyama, H. (1990b) Morphology and taxonomic significance of dormant branch primordia, dormant buds, and vegetative reproductive organs in the suborders Leucodontineae and Neckerineae (Musci, Isobryales). Bryologist, 93: 395-408.
3. Akiyama, H. and Nishimura, N. (1993) Further studies of branch buds in mosses; “Pseudoparaphyllia” and “Scaly leaves.” Journal of Plant Research, 106: 101-108.
4. Arikawa, T. and Higuchi, M. (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of the Plagiotheciaceae (Musci) and its relatives based on rbcL gene sequences. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 20: 231-245.
5. Arikawa, T. and Higuchi, M. (2003) Preliminary application of psaB sequence data to phylogenetic analysis of pleurocarpous mosses. Hikobia, 14: 33-44.
6. Arnell, H. W. (1875) De Skandinaviska löfmossornas kalendarium (PhD thesis). Esaias Edquists boktryckeri, Upsala.
7. Brotherus, V. F. (1924) Musci. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,. Vol. 11(1), Ed. 2 (ed. A. Engler). Verlag von W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
8. Brotherus, V. F. (1925) Musci. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,. Vol. 11(2), Ed. 2 (ed. A. Engler). Verlag von W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
9. Buck, W. R. (1980) A generic revision of the Entodontaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 48: 71-159.
10. Buck, W. R. (1988) Another view of familial delimitation in the Hookeriales. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 64: 29-36.
11. Buck, W. R. (1994) A new attempt at understanding the Meteoriaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 75: 51-72.
12. Buck, W. R. and Ireland, R. R. (1985) A reclassification of the Plagiotheciaceae. Nova Hedwigia, 41: 89-125.
13. Buck, W. R. and Vitt, D. H. (1986) Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon, 35: 21-60.
14. Buck, W. R., Goffinet, B. and Shaw, A. J. (2000a) Novel relationships in pleurocarpous mosses as revealed by cpDNA sequences. Bryologist, 103: 774-789.
15. Buck, W. R., Goffinet, B. and Shaw, A. J. (2000b) Testing morphological concepts of orders of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta) using phylogenetic reconstructions based on trnL-trnF and rps4 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 16: 180-198.
16. Buck, W. R., Cox, C. J., Shaw, A. J. and Goffinet, B. (2005). Ordinal relationships of pleurocarpous mosses, with special emphasis on the Hookeriales. Systematics and Diversity 2: 121-145.
17. Crum, H. and Anderson, L. E. (1981) Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
18. Crundwell, A. C. (1979) Rhizoids and moss taxonomy. In Bryophyte Systematics. The Systematics Association Special Volume 14 (ed. G. C. S. Clarke and J. G. Duckett). Academic Press, London, pp. 347-363.
19. De Luna, E., Buck, W. R., Akiyama, H., Arikawa, T., Tsubota, H., González, D., Newton, A. E. and Shaw, A. J. (2000) Ordinal phylogeny within the Hypnobryalean pleurocarpous mosses inferred from cladistic analyses of three chloroplast DNA sequence data sets: trnL-F, rps4, and rbcL. Bryologist, 103: 242-256.
20. Fleischer, M. (1902-1904) Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 2. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
21. Fleischer, M. (1906-1908) Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 3. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
22. Fleischer, M. (1915-1922) Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 4. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
23. Fleischer, M. (1920) Natürliches System der Laubmoose. Hedwigia, 61: 390-400.
24. Frey, W. (1970) Blattentwicklung bei Laubmoosen. Hedwigia, 20: 463-556.
25. Frey, W. (1972) Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattnetzes bei Leskeaceen und Thuidiaceen (Musci). Hedwigia, 23: 161-168.
26. Frey, W. (1974a) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Hypnodendron dendroides (Brid.) Touw (Hypnodendraceae, Musci). Hedwigia, 25: 229-249.
27. Frey, W. (1974b) Vergleichende entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Laubmoosblättern als Beitrag zur Systematik der Laubmoose. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, 121: 29-34.
28. Grandcolas, P., Deleporte, P., Desutter-Grandcolas, L. and Daugeron, C. (2001) Phylogenetics and ecology:As many characters as possible should be included in the cladistic analysis. Cladistics, 17: 104-110.
29. Granzow-de la Cerda, I. (1992) Análisis cladístico de la familia Anomodontaceae. Tropical Bryology, 6:95-104.
30. Hedenäs, L. (1987a) North European mosses with axillary rhizoids, a taxonomic study. Journal of Bryology, 14: 429-439.
31. Hedenäs, L. (1987b) On the ontogeny of alar cells in Drepanocladus aduncus, D. exannulatus and some other species. Journal of Bryology, 14: 753-759.
32. Hedenäs, L. (1989a) The genera Scorpidium and Hamatocaulis, gen. nov., in Northern Europe. Lindbergia, 15: 8-36.
33. Hedenäs, L. (1989b) The genus Sanionia (Musci) in Northwestern Europe, a taxonomic revision. Annales Botanici Fennici, 26: 399-419.
34. Hedenäs, L. (1989c) Some neglected character distribution patterns among the pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist, 92: 157-163.
35. Hedenäs, L. (1990) Axillary hairs in pleurocarpous mosses: A comparative study. Lindbergia, 15: 166-180.
36. Hedenäs, L. (1992a) The genus Pseudocalliergon in northern Europe. Lindbergia, 16: 80-99.
37. Hedenäs, L. (1992b) Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Calliergonella and Breidleria. Lindbergia, 16: 161-168.
38. Hedenäs, L. (1993) A generic revision of the Warnstorfia-Calliergon group. Journal of Bryology, 17: 447-479.
39. Hedenäs, L. (1994) The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses: A cladistic approach. Bryologist, 97:225-243.
40. Hedenäs, L. (1995) Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses: A cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology, 18: 723-781.
41. Hedenäs, L. (1996) A cladistic study of relationships between the Hookeriales, the Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindbergia, 21: 49-82.
42. Hedenäs, L. (1997a) A cladistic overview of the “Hookeriales”. Lindbergia, 21: 107-143.
43. Hedenäs, L. (1997b) The Drepanocladus s. str. species with excurrent costae (Musci: Amblystegiaceae). Nova Hedwigia, 64: 535-547.
44. Hedenäs, L. (1997c) A partial generic revision of Campylium (Musci). Bryologist, 100: 65-88.
45. Hedenäs, L. (1998a) Cladistic studies on pleurocarpous mosses: Research needs, and use of results. In Bryology for the Twenty-First Century (ed. J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton and J. G. Duckett). Maney Publishing, Leeds, pp. 125-141.
46. Hedenäs, L. (1998b) An evaluation of phylogenetic relationships among the Thuidiaceae, the Amblystegiaceae, and the temperate members of the Hypnaceae. Lindbergia, 22: 101-133.
47. Hedenäs, L. (1998c) An overview of the Drepanocladus sendtneri complex. Journal of Bryology, 20: 83-102.
48. Hedenäs, L. (1999) How important is phylogenetic history in explaining character states in pleurocarpous mosses? Canadian Journal of Botany, 77: 1723-1743.
49. Hedenäs, L. (2001a) Environmental factors potentially affecting character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist, 104: 72-91.
50. Hedenäs, L. (2001b) The importance of phylogeny and habitat factors in explaining gametophytic character states in European Amblystegiaceae. Journal of Bryology, 23: 205-219.
51. Hedenäs, L. (2002) Important complexes of intercorrelated character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Lindbergia, 27: 104-121.
52. Hedenäs, L. (2003) Amblystegiaceae (Musci). Flora Neotropica Monograph, 89: i-iv, 1-107.
53. Hedenäs, L. (2004) Morphological and anatomical evidence suggest that “Hylocomiaceae” taxa belong to at least two clades. Journal of Bryology, 26: 125-135.
54. Hedenäs, L. and Buck, W. R. (1999) A phylogenetic analysis of the Sematophyllaceae. Lindbergia, 24: 103-132.
55. Hedenäs, L. and Kooijman, A. (1996) Phylogeny and habitat adaptations within a monophyletic group of wetland moss genera (Amblystegiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 199: 33-52.
56. Hedenäs, L., Oliván, G. and Eldenäs, P. 2005. Phylogeny of the Calliergonaceae (Bryophyta) based on molecular and morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 252: 49-61.
57. Hedwig, J. (1782) Fundamentum historiae naturalis muscorum frondosorum. Lipsiae.
58. Hedwig, J. (1785-1787) Descriptio et adumbratio microscopico-analytica muscorum frondosorum. Vol. 1. Lipsiae.
59. Hedwig, J. (1789) Descriptio et adumbratio microscopico-analytica muscorum frondosorum…. Vol. 2. Lipsiae.
60. Hedwig, J. (1791-1792) Descriptio et adumbratio microscopico-analytica muscorum frondosorum. Vol. 3. Lipsiae.
61. Hedwig, J. (1797) Descriptio et adumbratio microscopico-analytica muscorum frondosorum. Vol. 4. Lipsiae.
62. Hedwig, J. (1801) Species muscorum frondosorum. Lipsiae.
63. Higuchi, M. (1985) A taxonomic revision of the genus Gollania Broth. (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 59: 1-77.
64. Huttunen, S., Ignatov, M. S., Müller, K. and Quandt, D. (2004) Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. In Molecular Systematics of Bryophytes (ed. B. Goffinet, V. Hollowell and R. Magill). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp. 328-361.
65. Hyvönen, J. and Enroth, J. (1994) Cladistic analysis of the genus Pinnatella (Neckeraceae, Musci). Bryologist, 97: 305-312.
66. Ignatov, M. S. and Ignatova, E. A. (2004) Flora mchov srednej tjacti evropejskoj Rossii. Tom 2. Fontinalaceae-Amblystegiaceae. Arctoa, 11, Suppl. 2: 609-944.
67. Ireland, R. R. (1968) Pleuroziopsidaceae, a new family of mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 31: 59-64.
68. Ireland, R. R. (1971) Moss pseudoparaphyllia. Bryologist, 74: 312-330.
69. Karczmarz, K. (1971) A monograph of the genus Calliergon (Sull.) Kindb. Monographiae Botanicae, 34:1-209, Pl. I-XX.
70. Kawai, I. (1968) Taxonomic studies on the midrib in Musci. I. Significance of the midrib in systematic botany. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 13: 127-157.
71. Kawai, I. (1971) Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci. III. On the affinity regarding the inner structure of the stem in some species of Thuidiaceae. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 16: 21-60.
72. Kawai, I. (1976) Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci. VI. On the essential coordination among the anatomical characteristics of the stem in some species of Hypnaceae. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 21: 47-124.
73. Kawai, I. (1977a) Die systematische Forschung auf Grund der Zellteilungsweise für die Bryophyten. II. Die Zellteilungsweisen der Gametophyten in der Lebensgeschichte (1) Climacium. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 22: 45-90.
74. Kawai, I. (1977b) Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci. VII. On the essential coordination among the anatomical characteristics of the stems in some species of Isobryales. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 22: 197-305.
75. Kawai, I. (1978) Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci. VIII. On the essential coordination among the anatomical characteristics of the stems in some species of Amblystegiaceae. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 23: 93-117.
76. Koponen, T. (1968) Generic revisions of Mniaceae Mitt. (Bryophyta). Annales Botanici Fennici, 5: 117-151.
77. Lin, S.-H. (1983a) A taxonomic revision of Phyllogoniaceae (Bryopsida). I. Journal of the Taiwan Museum, 36: 37-86.
78. Lin, S.-H. (1983b) A taxonomic revision of Phyllogoniaceae (Bryopsida). II. Journal of the Taiwan Museum, 37: 1-54.
79. Loeske, L. (1907) Drepanocladus, eine biologische Mischgattung. Hedwigia, 46: 300-321.
80. Malcolm, B. and Malcolm, N. (2000) Mosses and Other Bryophytes, an Illustrated Glossary. Micro-Optics Press, Nelson.
81. Mishler, B. D. (1986) A Hennigian approach to bryophyte phylogeny. Journal of Bryology, 14: 71-81.
82. Newton, A. E. and De Luna, E. (1999) A survey of morphological characters for phylogenetic study of the transition to pleurocarpy. Bryologist, 102: 651-682.
83. Nishimura, N. (1985) A revision of the genus Ctenidium (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 58: 1-82.
84. Nishimura, N. and Matsui, S. (1990a) SEM observations of moss pseudoparaphyllia. I. Isobryales. Hikobia, 10: 429-434.
85. Nishimura, N. and Matsui, S. (1990b) SEM observations of moss pseudoparaphyllia. II. Hypnobryales. Bulletin of the Hiruzen Research Institute, Okayama University of Science, 16: 117-138.
86. Noguchi, A. (1989) Illustrated Moss Flora of Japan, Part 3. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
87. Noguchi, A. (1991) Illustrated Moss Flora of Japan, Part 4. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
88. Noguchi, A. (1994) Illustrated Moss Flora of Japan, Part 5. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
89. Nyholm, E. (1960) Illustrated Moss Flora of Fennoscandia, II, Musci. Fasc. 4. C. W. K. Gleerup, Lund.
90. Nyholm, E. (1965) Illustrated Moss Flora of Fennoscandia, II, Musci. Fasc. 5. C. W. K. Gleerup, Lund.
91. Ochyra, R. (1985) Hypnobartlettia fontana gen. et sp. nov. (Musci: Hypnobartlettiaceae fam. nov.), a unique moss from New Zealand. Lindbergia, 11: 2-8.
92. Ochyra, R. (1989) Animadversions on the moss genus Cratoneuron (Sull.) Spruce. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 67: 203-242.
93. Paton, J. A. and Pearce, J. V. (1957) The occurrence, structure and functions of the stomata in British bryophytes. Transactions of the British Bryological Society, 3: 228-259.
94. Pedersen, N. and Hedenäs, L. (2001) Phylogenetic relationships within the Plagiotheciaceae. Lindbergia, 26: 62-76.
95. Pedersen, N. and Hedenäs, L. (2002) Phylogeny of the Plagiotheciaceae based on molecular and morphological evidence. Bryologist, 105: 310-324.
96. Ramsay, H. (1987) Cytological and other studies on the Hypnodendraceae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, 45: 135-153.
97. Rohrer, J. R. (1985) A phenetic and phylogenetic analysis of the Hylocomiaceae and Rhytidiaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 59: 185-240.
98. Smith, A. J. E. (1978) The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
99. Stearn, W. T. (1983) Botanical Latin, Ed. 3. David and Charles, Newton Abbot.
100. Tsubota, H., Akiyama, H., Yamaguchi, T. and Deguchi, H. (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the Sematophyllaceae (Hypnales, Musci) based on chloroplast rbcL sequences. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 90: 221-240.
101. Tsubota, H., Arikawa, T., Akiyama, H., De Luna, E., González, D., Higuchi, M. and Deguchi, H. (2002) Molecular phylogeny of hypnobryalean mosses as inferred from a large-scale dataset of chloroplast rbcL, with special reference to the Hypnaceae and possibly related families. Hikobia, 13: 645-665.
102. Tuomikoski, R. and Koponen, T. (1979) On the generic taxonomy of Calliergon and Drepanocladus (Musci, Amblystegiaceae). Annales Botanici Fennici, 16: 213-227.
103. Vanderpoorten, A., Hedenäs, L., Cox, C. and Shaw, A. J. (2002) Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23: 1-21.
104. Vanderpoorten, A., Goffinet, B., Hedenäs, L., Cox, C. J. and Shaw, A. J. (2003) A taxonomic reassessment of the Vittiaceae (Hypnales, Bryopsida): Evidence from phylogenetic analyses of combined chloroplast and nuclear sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 241: 1-12.
105. Watanabe, R. and Kawai, I. (1975) Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci. V What is expected of systematics regarding the inner structure of the stem in some species of Thuidiaceae. Science Reports of the Kanazawa University, 20: 21-76.
106. Wynne, F. E. (1944) Studies in Drepanocladus. I. History, morphology, phylogeny, and variation. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 71: 207-225.
107. Zomlefer, W. B. (1993) A revision of Rigodium (Musci: Rigodiaceae). Bryologist, 96: 1-72.