Robust, integrated computational control of NMR experiments to achieve optimal assignment by ADAPT-NMR

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Bahrami, Arash ^a   Tonelli, Marco ^a   Sahu, Sarata C ^a   Singarapu, Kiran K ^a   Eghbalnia, Hamid R ^b   Markley, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON 13; NITROGEN 15; CARBON; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; NITROGEN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ASSIGNMENT DIRECTED DATA COLLECTION ALGORITHM UTILIZING A PROBABILISTIC TOOLKIT; AUTOMATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ISOTOPE LABELING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SPECTROMETER; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROBABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; CARBON ISOTOPES; DATA COLLECTION; NITROGEN ISOTOPES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84858044293     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033173     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Güntert P, (2004) Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods in Molecular Biology 278: 353-378.
2. Volk J, Herrmann T, Wu{double acute}thrich K, (2008) Automated sequence-specific protein NMR assignment using the memetic algorithm MATCH. J Biomol NMR 41: 127-138.
3. Herrmann T, Güntert P, Wüthrich K, (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE-identification in the NOESY spectra using the new software ATNOS. J Biomol NMR 24: 171-189.
4. Herrmann T, Güntert P, Wüthrich K, (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319: 209-227.
5. Moseley HN, Monleon D, Montelione GT, (2001) Automatic determination of protein backbone resonance assignments from triple resonance nuclear magnetic resonance data. Methods Enzymol 339: 91-108.
6. Eghbalnia HR, Bahrami A, Wang L, Assadi A, Markley JL, (2005) Probabilistic Identification of Spin Systems and their Assignments including Coil-Helix Inference as Output (PISTACHIO). J Biomol NMR 32: 219-233.
7. Bardiaux B, Malliavin T, Nilges M, (2011) ARIA for Solution and Solid-State NMR. Methods Mol Biol 831: 453-483.
8. Fiorito F, Herrmann T, Damberger FF, Wüthrich K, (2008) Automated amino acid side-chain NMR assignment of proteins using 13C- and 15N-resolved 3D [1H, 1H]-NOESY. J Biomol NMR 42: 23-33.
9. Lopez-Mendez B, Güntert P, (2006) Automated protein structure determination from NMR spectra. J Am Chem Soc 128: 13112-13122.
10. Bahrami A, Assadi AH, Markley JL, Eghbalnia HR, (2009) Probabilistic interaction network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from protein NMR spectroscopy. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000307.
11. Eghbalnia HR, Bahrami A, Tonelli M, Hallenga K, Markley JL, (2005) High-resolution iterative frequency identification for NMR as a general strategy for multidimensional data collection. J Am Chem Soc 127: 12528-12536.
12. Platt JC, (1999) Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. pp. 61-74 Advances in Large Margin Classifiers.
13. Huang C, Darwiche A, (1996) Inference in Belief Networks: A Procedural Guide. Int. J Approximate Reasoning 15: 225-236.
14. Smyth P, (1998) Belief networks, hidden Markov models, and Markov random fields: a unifying view. Pattern Recognition Letters 18: 1261-1268.
15. Tatikonda SC, Jordan MI, (2002) Loopy belief propagation and Gibbs measures. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence San Francisco, CA, USA Morgan Kaufmann pp. 493-500.
16. Yedidia JS, Freeman WT, Weiss Y, (2005) Constructing free-energy approximations and generalized belief propagation algorithms. Ieee Transactions on Information Theory 51: 2282-2312.
17. Mooij JM, Kappen HJ, (2005) On the properties of the Bethe approximation and loopy belief propagation on binary networks. J Stat Mech 11: 11012-11039.
18. Loeliger H-A, (2004) An Introduction to Factor graphs. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 21: 28-41.
19. Shannon CE, (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423 623-656.
20. Singarapu KK, Radek JT, Tonelli M, Markley JL, Lan Q, (2010) Differences in the structure and dynamics of the apo- and palmitate-ligated forms of Aedes aegypti sterol carrier protein 2 (AeSCP-2). J Biol Chem 285: 17046-17053.
21. Singarapu KK, Tonelli M, Chow DC, Frederick RO, Westler WM, et al. (2011) Structural Characterization of Hsp12, the Heat Shock Protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Aqueous Solution where it is Intrinsically Disordered and in Detergent Micelles where it is Locally α-Helical,. J Biol Chem 286: 43447-43453.
22. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, et al. (1995) NMRPIPE- A Multidimensional Spectral Processing System Based on UNIX Pipes. J Biomol NMR 6: 277-293.
23. Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JM, et al. (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 4685-4690.
24. Zhao Q, Song J, Jin Z, Danilova V, Hellekant G, et al. (2005) Probing the sweet determinants of brazzein: Wild-type brazzein and a tasteless variant, brazzein-ins(R18a-I18b), exhibit different pH-dependent NMR chemical shifts, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335: 256-263.