Online Newspapers and TESOL Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective

Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 139-158

  Knox, John S ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858010834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Alvermann, D. E. and Reinking, D. (eds). (2003). ‘New directions in research: media and online literacy studies’. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (3): 386–413.
2. Baldry, A. (2000). ‘ESP in a visual society: comparative and historical dimensions in multimodality and multimediality’. In A. Baldry (ed.), Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age: Papers in English Linguistics (pp. 41–89). Campobasso: Palladino Editore.
3. Baldry, A. and Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.
4. Barthelson, M. (2002). Reading Behaviour in Online News Reading. Lund University, Lund. Available online at: http://www.sol.lu.se/humlab/eyetracking/Studentpapers/MariaBarthelson.pdf
5. Bateman, J., Delin, J. and Henschel, R. (2006). ‘Mapping the multimodal genres of traditional and electronic newspapers’. In T. D. Royce and W. L. Bowcher (eds), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse (pp. 147–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Burns, A., & Hood, S. (eds). (1998). Teachers’ Voices 3: Teaching Critical Literacy. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research (NCELTR).
8. Callaghan, M. and Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching Factual Writing: A Genre-Based Approach (Report of the DSP Literacy Project, Metropolitan East Region). Sydney: N.S.W. Department of School Education.
9. Canagarajah, S. (2001). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Chandler-Olcott, K. and Mahar, D. (2003). ‘“Tech-savviness” meets multiliteracies: exploring adolescent girls’ technology-mediated literacy practices’. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (3): 356–85.
11. Christie, F. (ed.). (1999). Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Cassell.
12. Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (eds). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. South Yarra: Macmillan.
13. Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Texts Work. Rozelle: Primary English Teaching Association.
14. de Silva Joyce, H. and Burns, A. (1999). Focus on Grammar. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research (NCELTR).
15. Feez, S. (1998). Text-Based Syllabus Design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research (NCELTR).
16. Freebody, P. and Luke, A. (1990). ‘“Literacies” programs: Debates and demands in cultural context’. Prospect, 5 (3): 7–16.
17. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Hampshire: The Falmer Press.
18. Grundy, P. (1993). Newspapers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (Second edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Hartcher, P. (2006). ‘Responsibility of media reporting’, Japan Australia Forum. Hosted by Macquarie University, Sydney, 6 November 2006.
22. Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M. and Lundqvist, D. (2003). ‘Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading’. In J. Hyona, R. Radach and H. Deube (eds), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 657–70). Oxford: Elsevier.
24. Howatt, A. P. R. (1988). ‘From structural to communicative’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8: 14–29.
25. Jewitt, C. and Kress, G. (eds). (2003). Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
26. Joyce, H. (1992). Workplace Texts in the Language Classroom. Sydney: N. S. W. Adult Migrant English Service.
27. Kachru, B. B. and Nelson, C. L. (2001). ‘World Englishes’. In A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds.), Analysing English in a Global Context: A Reader (pp. 9–25). London: Routledge.
28. Kern, R. and Schultz, J. M. (2005). ‘Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction’. Modern Language Journal, 89 (3): 381–92.
29. Kimber, K. and Wyatt-Smith, C. (2006). ‘Using and creating knowledge with new technologies: a case for students-as-designers’. Learning, Media and Technology, 31 (1): 19–34.
30. Knox, J. S. (2007a). ‘Visual–verbal communication on online newspaper home pages’. Visual Communication, 6 (1): 19–53.
31. Knox, J. S. (in press). ‘Designing the news in an online newspaper: a systemic description’. In A. Baldry and E. Montagna (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives On Multimodality: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multimodality. Campobasso: Palladino.
32. Krajka, J. (2000). ‘Some possibilities for using on-line newspapers in the ESL classroom’. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(4). Available online at: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krajka-OnlineNews.html. Accessed on 12 February 2007.
33. Kress, G. (2000). ‘Multimodality: challenges to thinking about language’. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2): 337–40.
34. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
35. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1998). ‘Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout’. In A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Kubota, R. (1998). ‘Ideologies of English in Japan’. World Englishes, 17(3), 295–306.
37. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). ‘L2 literacy and the design of the self: a case study of a teenager writing on the internet’. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (3): 457–82.
38. Larimer, R. E. and Schleicher, L. (1999). New Ways in Using Authentic Materials in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, Inc.
39. Lemke, J. L. (2002). ‘Travels in hypermodality’. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.
40. Lewenstein, M., Edwards, G., Tatar, D. and de Vigal, A. (2000). The Stanford-Poynter Eyetracking Study. Retrieved November 9, 2004, from http://www.poynterextra.org/et/ihtm
41. Li, D. (2001). ‘Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea’. In D. R. Hall and A. Hewings (eds), Innovation in English Language Teaching: A Reader (pp. 149–65). London: Routledge.
42. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
43. Martin, J. R. (1994). ‘Macro-genres: the ecology of the page’. Network, 21: 29–52.
44. Martin, J. R. (2002). ‘Fair trade: negotiating meaning in multimodal texts’. In P. Coppock (ed.), The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing (pp. 311–38). Turnhout: Brepols.
45. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
46. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Martinec, R. (2005). ‘Topics in multimodality’. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen and J. J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 157–81). London: Equinox.
48. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. (1994). Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London: Longman.
50. New London Group. (1997). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures (Revised ed.). Haymarket, NSW: Centre for Workplace Communication and Culture.
51. O’Halloran, K. L. (1999). ‘Interdependence, interaction and metaphor in multisemiotic texts’. Social Semiotics, 9(3), 317–54.
52. O’Halloran, K. L. (ed.). (2004). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
53. O’Toole, M. (1994). The Language of Displayed Art. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
54. Olivares, R. A. (1993). Using the Newspaper to Teach ESL Learners. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
55. Petrie, G. M. (2003). ‘ESL teachers’ views on visual language: a grounded theory’. The Reading Matrix, 3 (3): 137–68.
56. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Pennycook, A. (1994). ‘Incommensurable discourses?’ Applied Linguistics, 15: 115–38.
58. Pennycook, A. (ed.). (1999). Critical Approaches to TESOL: Special Edition of TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3): 321–616.
59. Royce, T. D. (2002). ‘Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: exploring visual– verbal synergy’. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (2): 191–205.
60. Sanderson, P. (1999). Using Newspapers in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.
62. Seedhouse, P. (1994). Using newspapers on CD-ROM. TESL-EJ, 1 (2): A-3, available at: http://tesl-ej.org/about.html and http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESLEJ/ej02/a.3.html. Accessed on 12 February 2007.
63. Shohamy, E. G. (2001). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. Harlow: Longman.
64. Snyder, I. (ed.). (1997). Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
65. Snyder, I. (ed.). (2002). Silicon Literacies: Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age. London: Routledge.
66. Snyder, I. and Beavis, C. (eds). (2004). Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning, and Playing in an Electronic World. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
67. Stein, P. (2000). ‘Rethinking resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom’. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2): 333–36.
68. Stein, P. (2004). ‘Representation, rights and resources: multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom’. In B. Norton and K. Toohey (eds.), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (pp. 95–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Stenglin, M. and Iedema, R. (2001). ‘How to analyse visual images: a guide for TESOL teachers’. In A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds), Analysing English in a Global Context: A Reader (pp. 194–208). London: Routledge.
70. Tollefson, J. W. (ed.). (1995). Power and Inequality in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
72. Unsworth, L. (2006a). E-literature for Children: Enhancing Digital Literacy Learning. New York: Routledge.
73. Unsworth, L. (2006b). ‘Multiliteracies and a metalanguage of image/text relations: implications for teaching English as a first or additional language in the twentyfirst century’. Journal of ACTA. Series ‘S’: Special Edition 2006, Tales out of school: Identity and English Language Teaching, 147–62.
74. Warschauer, M. (2002). ‘Languages.com: the internet and linguistic pluralism’. In I. Snyder (ed.), Silicon Literacies: Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age (pp. 62–74). London: Routledge.
75. White, P. R. R. (2001, 1st May 2005). The Appraisal Website. Retrieved May 23, 2005, from http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/
76. Wyatt-Smith, C. and Kimber, K. (2005). ‘Valuing and evaluating student-generated online multimodal texts: rethinking what counts’. English in Education, 39 (2): 22–43.
77. Wells, G. (1987). ‘Apprenticeship in literacy’. Interchange, 18 (1/2): 109–23.
78. Zammit, K. and Downes, T. (2002). ‘New learning environments and the multiliterate individual: a framework for educators’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25 (2): 24–36.