Understanding e-learning system usage outcomes in hybrid courses

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 118-127

  Najmul Islam, A K M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; HIGHER EDUCATION; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED LEARNING; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; RESEARCH MODELS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84857990860     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.613     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. C. Dalsgaard, "Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems", European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 2006, Retrieved March 26, 2011 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/ 2006/Christian-Dals gaard.pdf
2. T. Browne, M. Jenkins, and R. Walker, "A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom", Interactive Learning Environments, 2006, 14 (2), pp. 177-192.
3. T.J. McGill, and J.E. Klobas, "A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact", Computers & Education, 2009, 52, pp. 496-508.
4. R.J. Edling, "Information Technology in the classroom: Experiences and recommendations", Campus Wide Information Systems, 2000, 17 (1), pp. 10-15.
5. A.K.M.N. Islam, "Understanding continued usage intention in e-learning context", In: 24th Bled eConference, AIS e-library, 2011, Slovenia.
6. th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), AIS elibrary, 2011, Brisbane, Australia.
7. F.D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13 (3), pp. 319-340.
8. A. Bhattacherjee, "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model", MIS Quarterly, 2001, 25 (3), pp. 251-370.
9. J.-K. Lee, and W.-K. Lee, "The relationship of e- Learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e- Learning environment quality", Computers in Human Behavior, 2008, 24, pp. 32-47.
10. S.S. Liaw, "Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of elearning: A case study of the Blackboard system", Computers & Education, 2008, 51, pp. 864-873.
11. W.H. DeLone, and E.R. McLean, "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable", Information Systems Research, 1992, 3 (1), pp. 60-95.
12. R.D. Johnson, S. Hornik, and E. Salas, "An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments", International J. Human- Computer Studies, 2008, 66, pp. 356-369.
13. H.H. Ellerman, and E.L. Free, "A subject-controlled environment for paired associate learning", Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1990, 17, pp. 97-102.
14. E.T. Freitag, and H.J. Sullivan, "Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: an alternative form of learner control", Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 1995, 43, pp. 5-14.
15. P. Northrup, "A framework for designing interactivity into Web-based instruction", Education Technology, 2001, 41 (2), pp. 31-39.
16. S.S. Liaw, H.M. Huang, and G.D. Chen, "An activitytheoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward elearning systems", Computers in Human Behavior, 2007, 23, pp. 1906-1920.
17. D.E. Leinder, and S. Jarvenpaa, "The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view", MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19 (3), pp. 265-291.
18. M. Wang, and M. Kang, Cybergogy for engaged learning: a framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. In: Hung, D., Khine, M.S. (eds.) Engaged Learning and Emerging Technologies, 2006, pp. 225-253, Springer, Netherland.
19. R. Wegerif, "The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1998, 2 (1), pp. 34-49.
20. L. Currin, "Feelin' groovy", eLearn Magazine, 2003, Retrieved May 6, 2011 from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&art icle=10-1
21. A.W. Gatian, "Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness?", Information & Management, 1994, 26 (3), pp. 119-131.
22. M. Limayem, S.G. Hirt, and C.M.K. Cheung, "How Habit Limits The Predictive Power Of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance", MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31 (4), pp. 705-737.
23. Y. Sun, A. Bhattacherjee, and W. Ma, "Extending technology usage to work settings: The role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation", Information & Management, 2009, 46, pp. 351-356.
24. S.-J. Hong, J.Y.L. Thong, and K.Y. Tam, "Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet", Decision Support Systems, 2006, 42 (3), pp. 1819-1834.
25. M. Paechter, B. Maier, and D. Macher, "Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction", Computers & Education, 2010, 54, pp. 222-229.
26. D.W. Straub, M.-C. Boudreau, and D. Gefen, "Validation guidelines for IS positivist research", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2004, 13, pp. 380-427.
27. C.M. Ringle, S. Wende, and A. Will, "Smart PLS 2.0 M3", University of Hamburg, 2005, www.smartpls.de.
28. C. Fornell, and F.F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18 (1), pp. 39-50.
29. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill, New York , 1978.
30. D. Gefen, and D. Straub, "A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example", The communications of the Associations for Information Systems, 2005, 16 (5), pp. 91-109.
31. R. Woods, D.B. Jason, and D. Hopper, "Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-face instruction", The Internet and Higher Education, 2004, 7, pp. 281-297.
32. T.J. Larsen, A.M. Sorebo, and O. Sorebo, "The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use", Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, 25, pp. 778-784.
33. H. Cho, G. Gay, B. Davidson, and A. Ingraffea, "Social networks, communication styles and learning performance in a CSCL community", Computers & Education, 2007, 49 (2), 309-329.
34. M. Ortiz, J. Hoyos, and M. Lopez, "The social networks of academic performance in a student context of poverty in Mexico", Social Networks, 2004, 26 (2), pp. 175-188.
35. A.R. Dennis, R.M. Fuller, and S.J. Valacich, "Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity", MIS Quarterly, 2008, 32 (3), pp. 575-600.
36. H. Lim, S.-G. Lee, and K. Nam, "Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness", International Journal of Information Management, 2007, 27, pp. 22-35.
37. P. Dourish, and S. Bly, "Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group", In: Proceeding of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1992, New York: ACM, 541-547.