Extending technology usage to work settings: The role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation

Information and Management

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 351-356

  Sun, Yuan ^a   Bhattacherjee, Anol ^b   Ma, Qingguo ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Enterprise resource planning; Information technology usage; Perceived work compatibility; Performance effect; Survey research

Indexed keywords

CURRENT MODELS; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; ERP IMPLEMENTATION; ERP SYSTEM; EXPLANATORY POWER; FIELD SURVEYS; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT; PERCEIVED WORK COMPATIBILITY; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; PERFORMANCE EFFECT; PERFORMANCE IMPACT; SURVEY RESEARCH; USAGE INTENTION; USAGE MODELS; USER PERCEPTIONS; WORK COMPATIBILITY;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; RESEARCH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SURVEYS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 68349139576     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2009.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Burton-Jones A., and Hubona G.S. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43 6 (2006) 706-717
2. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
3. Dishaw M.T., and Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management 36 1 (1999) 9-21
4. Jacobson S., Shepherd J., D'Aquila M., and Carter K. The ERP Market Sizing Report, 2006-2011 (2007), AMR Research, Boston, MA
5. Lindell M.K., and Whitney D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 1 (2001) 114-121
6. Moore G.C., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 192-222
7. Petter S., and McLean E.R. A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: an examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management 46 3 (2009) 159-166
8. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., and Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 5 (2003) 879-903
9. Staples D.S., and Seddon P. Testing the technology-to-performance chain model. Journal of Organizational & End User Computing 16 4 (2004) 17-36
10. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
11. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 342-365
12. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
13. Wixom B.H., and Todd P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 16 1 (2005) 85-102