"knight in shining armour" or "frankenstein's creation"? the coverage of synthetic biology in German-language media

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 163-173

  Gschmeidler, Brigitte ^a   Seiringer, Alexandra ^a  

^a NONE   (Austria)

Author keywords

communication; media analysis; metaphors; science journalism; synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857820395     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662511403876     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Balmer A.,Martin P.Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2008:.
2. Baumgardner J.,Acker K.,Adefuye O., et al.Solving a Hamiltonian Path Problem with a Bacterial Computer.Journal of Biological Engineering. 2009;3 (1): 11.
3. Boldt J.,Müller O.Newtons of the Leaves of Grass.Nature Biotechnology. 2008;26 (4): 387-9.
4. Boldt J.,Müller O.,Maio G.Synthetische Biologie: Eine ethisch-philosophische Analyse. Bern: Eidgenössische Ethikkommission für die Biotechnologie im Ausserhumanbereich EKAH und Ariane Willemsen; 2009:.
5. Brandt C.Genetic Code, Text, and Scripture: Metaphors and Narration in German Molecular Biology.Science in Context. 2005;18 (4): 629-48.
6. Christidou V.,Dimopoulos K.,Koulaidis V.Constructing Social Representations of Science and Technology: The Role of Metaphors in the Press and the Popular Scientific Magazines.Public Understanding of Science. 2004;13 (4): 347-62.
7. Cserer A.,Seiringer A.Pictures of Synthetic Biology.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 27-35.
8. Dabrock P.Playing God? Synthetic Biology as a Theological and Ethical Challenge.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 47-54.
9. De Vreese C.H.News Framing: Theory and Typology.Information Design Journal + Document Design. 2005;13 (1): 51-62.
10. DFG, Acatech, and Leopoldina (2009) Synthetische Biologie: Stellungnahme. Bonn/München/Halle: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, acatech - Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
11. Gaskell G.,Allum N.,Bauer M., et al.Biotechnology and the European Public.Nature Biotechnology. 2000;18 (9): 935-8.
12. Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., et al. (2010) "Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of Change?" Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
13. Gibson D.G.,Benders G.A.,Andrews-Pfannkoch C., et al.Complete Chemical Synthesis, Assembly, and Cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium Genome.Science. 2008;319 (5867): 1215-20.
14. Hellsten I.From Sequencing to Annotating: Extending the Metaphor of the Book of Life from Genetics to Genomics.New Genetics & Society. 2005;24 (3): 283-97.
15. Holliman R.Media Coverage of Cloning: A Study of Media Content, Production and Reception.Public Understanding of Science. 2004;13 (2): 107-30.
16. IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) (2008) Synthetic Biology: Risks and Opportunities of an Emerging Field. Geneva: IRGC.
17. Kronberger N.,Holtz P.,Kerbe W.,Strasser E.,Wagner W.Communicating Synthetic Biology: From the Lab via the Media to the Broader Public.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 19-26.
18. Liakopoulos M.Pandora's Box or Panacea? Using Metaphors to Create the Public Representations of Biotechnology.Public Understanding of Science. 2002;11 (1): 5-32.
19. McCombs M.E.,Shaw D.L.The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972;36 (2): 176-87.
20. Mayring P.Combination and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research. 2001;2 (1): 26.
21. Mayring P.Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz; 2007:.
22. Mitchelstein E.,Boczkowski P.J.Between Tradition and Change.Journalism. 2009;10 (5): 562-86.
23. Musolff A.Progressive' Evolution and 'Totipotent' Stem Cells: Metaphors in British and German Debates about the 'Life Sciences.Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE). 2009;17:45-59.
24. Nerlich B.,Hellsten I.Beyond the Human Genome: Microbes, Metaphors and What it Means to be Human in an Interconnected Post-genomic World.New Genetics & Society. 2009;28 (1): 19-36.
25. Nisbet M.C.,Brossard D.,Kroepsch A.Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics.The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2003;8 (2): 36-70.
26. Pauwels E.Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies on U.S. Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 37-46.
27. PauwelsE.IfrimI. (2008) Trends in American and European Press Coverage of Synthetic Biology: Tracking the Last Five Years of Coverage. Synbio 1 (Synthetic Biology Project, 2008). URL: http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/5999/synbio1final.pdf.
28. PCSBI (Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues) (2010) New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies. Washington, DC.
29. Petersen A.Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media.Social Science & Medicine. 2001;52 (8): 1255-68.
30. Petersen A.The Metaphors of Risk: Biotechnology in the News.Health, Risk & Society. 2005;7 (3): 203-8.
31. Petersen A.,Anderson A.,Allan S.Science Fiction/Science Fact: Medical Genetics in News Stories.New Genetics & Society. 2005;24 (3): 337-53.
32. Pramling N.,Säljö R.Scientific Knowledge, Popularisation, and the Use of Metaphors: Modern Genetics in Popular Science Magazines.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2007;51 (3): 275-95.
33. Ro D.-K.,Paradise E.M.,Ouellet M., et al.Production of the Antimalarial Drug Precursor Artemisinic Acid in Engineered Yeast.Nature. 2006;440 (7086): 940-3.
34. Rödder S.Reassessing the Concept of a Medialization of Science: A Story from the 'Book of Life'.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18 (4): 452-63.
35. Royal Academy of Engineering (2009a) Synthetic Biology: Public Dialogue on Synthetic Biology. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.
36. Royal Academy of Engineering (2009b) Synthetic Biology: Scope, Applications and Implications. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.
37. Scheufele D.A.Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.Journal of Communication. 1999;49 (1): 103-22.
38. Scheufele D.A.,Lewenstein B.The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies.Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2005;7 (6): 659-67.
39. Schmidt M.Diffusion of Synthetic Biology: A Challenge to Biosafety.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2008;2 (1-2): 1-6.
40. Schmidt, M., Torgersen, H., Ganguli-Mitra, A., Kelle, A., Deplazes, A. and Biller-Andorno, N. (2008) "SYNBIOSAFE e-Conference: Online Community Discussion on the Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology," Systems and Synthetic Biology 2(1): 7-17.
41. Schmidt M.,Ganguli-Mitra A.,Torgersen H.,Kelle A.,Deplazes A.,Biller-Andorno N.A Priority Paper for the Societal and Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 3-7.
42. SmithM.K. (2005) "Bruce W. Tuckman - Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing in Groups," URL (accessed 2 February 2010): www.infed.org/thinkers/tuckman.htm.
43. Synth-Ethics (2010) "Synthethics: Identification of Ethical Issues and Analysis of Public Discourse," Report on the first work package. URL (accessed 30 November 2010): www.synthethics.eu.
44. Torgersen H.Synthetic Biology in Society: Learning from Past Experience?.Systems and Synthetic Biology. 2009;3 (1): 9-17.
45. Van den Belt H.Playing God in Frankenstein's Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life.NanoEthics. 2009;3 (3): 257-68.
46. Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Berg, S. and Torgersen, H. (2006) "The Monster in the Public Imagination," in G. Gaskell and M. Bauer (eds) Genomics and Society: Legal, Ethical and Social Dimensions, pp. 150-68. London: Earthscan.