Beyond the human genome: Microbes, metaphors and what it means to be human in an interconnected post-genomic world

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-36

  Nerlich, Brigitte ^a   Hellsten, Iina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ATHENA INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Human Microbiome Project; Life; Metaphor; Microbes; Microbiome; Self

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HEALTH; HUMAN GENOME; LITERATURE; MICROBIAL GENETICS; MICROBIOME; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST;

EID: 61649087202     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: 14699915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636770802670233     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anonymous, 2008. Will systems biology bring probiotics to the table? The seven stones blog [online]. Available from: http://blogmsb.embo.org/ blog/2008/01/will-probiotics-bring-systems.html [Accessed 20 February 2008].
2. Avise, J.C., 2001. Evolving genomic metaphors: a new look at the language of DNA. Science, 294, 86-87.
3. Blaser, M., 2006. Who are we? Indigenous microbes and the ecology of human diseases. EMBO Reports, 7, 956-960.
4. Crawford, P., et al., 2008. The moral careers of microbes and the rise of the matrons: an analysis of UK national press coverage of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 1995-20-06. Health, Risk & Society, 10 (4), 331-347.
5. Dawkins, R., 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. DeLong, E.F., 2004. Microbial population genomics and ecology: a new frontier. In: C.M. Fraser, K. E. Nelson, and T.D. Read, eds. Microbial genomics. Totowa, NJ: Human Press Inc., 419-442.
7. Doney, S.C., et al., 2004. From genes to ecosystems: the ocean's new frontier. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2 (9), 457-466.
8. Dupré, J. and O'Malley, M.A., in press. Varieties of living things: life at the intersection of lineage of metabolism. Synthese.
9. Gill, S.R., et al., 2007. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science, 312, 1355-1359.
10. Goldenfeld, N. and Woese, C., 2007. Biology's next revolution. Nature, 445, 369.
11. Gordon, J., et al., 2003. Response from Jeffrey I. Gordon et al.: commensal bacteria make a difference. Trends in Microbiology, 11, 150-151.
12. Gordon, J., et al., 2005. Extending our view of self: the Human Gut Microbiome Initiative (HGMI). Paper produced for the National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, Available from: http://www.genome.gov/pages/research/sequencing/seqproposals/hgmiseq.pdf [Accessed 20 February 2007].
13. Hellsten, I. and Nerlich, B., in prep. The semantics of synthetic biology. Article manuscript in preparation.
14. Knudsen, S., 2005. Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: a study of the development of the metaphor of genetic code. Public Understanding of Science, 14 (4), 373-392.
15. Koteyko, N. and Nerlich, B., 2007. Multimodal discourse analysis of probiotic web advertising. International Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 23, [online]. Available from: http://www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/ tle/journal/issues/issue23-07.html [Accessed].
16. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Lopez, J.J., 2007. Notes on metaphors, notes as metaphors: the genome as musical spectacle. Science Communication, 29 (1), 7-34.
18. McManus, R., 2005. More microbe than human: Relman's investigations prove we are never alone. NIH Record, LVII (24) [online]. Available from: http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/newsletters/2005/12-02-2005/story03.htm [Accessed 2 October 2008].
19. Musolff, A., 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. NERC, 2006. What is genomics and post-genomics? [online]. Available from: http://www.nerc.ac. uk/research/programmes/proteomics/background/whatis.asp [Accessed 2 October 2008].
21. Nerlich, B., in press. The antibiotic apocalypse and the "war" on superbugs: the risks and benefits of catastrophe discourse (with a reply by Richard James). Public Understanding of Science.
22. Nerlich, B. and Dingwall, R., 2003. Deciphering the human genome. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank, and M. Pütz, eds. Cognitive models in language and thought: ideology, metaphors and meanings. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 395-428.
23. Nerlich, B. and Halliday, C., 2007. Avian flu: the creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29 (1), 46-65.
24. Nerlich, B. and Hellsten, I., 2004. Genomics: shifts in metaphorical landscape between 2001 and 2003. New Genetics and Society, 23, 255-268.
25. Nerlich, B. and Kidd, K., eds., 2005. The genome and its publics: towards a social and cultural understanding of genomics. New Genetics and Society, Special Issue, 24.
26. Nerlich, B., Dingwall, R., and Clarke, D.D., 2002. The book of life: how the human genome project was revealed to the public. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6 (4), 445-469.
27. NIH, 2007. NIH launches Human Microbiome Project. NIH Press Release [online]. Available from: http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/dec2007/od-19.htm [Accessed 20 February 2007].
28. Noble, D., 2006a. The music of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Noble, D., 2006b. Re: systems biology - the music of life and the theory of (biological) relativity, Intentblog [online]. Available from: http://www.intentblog.com/archives/2006/10/prof-denis-nobl.html [Accessed 20 February 2007].
30. Ouzounis, C. and Mazière, P., 2006. Maps, books and other metaphors for systems biology. Biosystems, 85, 6-10.
31. Pappas, G., 2005. A new literary metaphor for the genome or proteome. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 33, 15.
32. Porta, M., 2003. The new genome sequence is a jazz score. International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 29-31.
33. Relman, D.A., 2002. The human body as microbial observatory. Nature Genetics, 30, 131-133.
34. Relman, D.A. and Falkow, S., 2001. The meaning and impact of the human genome sequence for microbiology. Trends in Microbiology, 9 (5), 206-208.
35. Richards, I.A., 1936. The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Schmitt, R., 2005. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10, 358-394 [online]. Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/qr/qr10-2/schmitt.pdf [Accessed 20 February 2007].
37. Seiler, L.H., 2007. What are we? The social construction of the human biological self. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37 (3), 243-277.
38. The National Academies, 2007. Understanding our microbial planet: the new science of metagenomics [online]. Available from: http://dels.nas.edu/ dels/rpt-briefs/metagenomics-final.pdf [Accessed 2 June 2008].
39. Tomes, N., 1998. The gospel of germs: men, women and the microbe in American life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Turnbaugh, P.J., et al., 2007. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature, 449, 804-810.
41. Turney, J., 2005. The sociable gene. EMBO Report, 6 (9), 808-810.