Substrate-mediated nucleic acid delivery from self-assembled monolayers

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 119-126

  Wang, Chung Huei K ^a   Pun, Suzie H ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DELIVERY VECTOR; DELIVERY VEHICLE; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; GENE DELIVERY; NON-SPECIFIC INTERACTIONS; SAMS; SPECIFIC INTERACTION; SPECIFIC RECOGNITION; SURFACE COMPOSITIONS; TRANSFECTION EFFICIENCY;

CELL IMMOBILIZATION; GENE THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER; NUCLEIC ACIDS;

SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS;

ALKANE DERIVATIVE; NUCLEIC ACID; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHELATION; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; COVALENT BOND; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; GENE TARGETING; GENE VECTOR; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79951682615     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.11.005     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Saul J.M., et al. Delivery of non-viral gene carriers from sphere-templated fibrin scaffolds for sustained transgene expression. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4705-4716.
2. Salvay D.M., et al. Gene delivery by surface immobilization of plasmid to tissue-engineering scaffolds. Gene Ther. 2010, 17:1134-1141.
3. Shin S., et al. Lentivirus delivery by adsorption to tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 93A:1252-1259.
4. Lo C.T., et al. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticle assembly for highly efficient delivery of potent therapeutic agents from medical devices. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3631-3642.
5. Campoccia D., et al. Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials and the risks for the spread of antibiotic resistance following their prophylactic and therapeutic clinical use. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6363-6377.
6. Fujimoto H., et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of small interfering RNA and poly(ethyleneimine) for substrate-mediated electroporation with high efficiency. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397:571-578.
7. Cheng X., et al. Screening of human gene promoter activities using transfected-cell arrays. Gene 2010, 450:48-54.
8. Luo D., Saltzman W.M. Enhancement of transfection by physical concentration of DNA at the cell surface. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:893-895.
9. Bajaj B., et al. High efficiencies of gene transfer with immobilized recombinant retrovirus: kinetics and optimization. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17:587-596.
10. De Laporte L., Shea L.D. Matrices and scaffolds for DNA delivery in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59:292-307.
11. O'Rorke S., Keeney M., Pandit A. Non-viral polyplexes: scaffold mediated delivery for gene therapy. Prog. Poly. Sci. 2010, 35:441-458.
12. Kulkarni M., et al. Liposomal gene delivery mediated by tissue-engineered scaffolds. Trends in Biotechnology 2010, 28:28-36.
13. Dubey M., et al. Structure and order of phosphonic acid-based self-assembled monolayers on Si(100). Langmuir 2010, 26:14747-14754.
14. Ulman A. Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96:1533-1554.
15. Love J.C., et al. Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105:1103-1169.
16. Nuzzo R.G., et al. Fundamental-studies of microscopic wetting on organic-surfaces. 1. Formation and structural characterization of a self-consistent series of polyfunctional organic monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112:558-569.
17. Homola J. Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377:528-539.
18. Pattnaik P. Surface plasmon resonance - applications in understanding receptor-ligand interaction. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 126:79-92.
19. Perl A., et al. Microcontact printing: limitations and achievements. Adv. Mat. 2009, 21:2257-2268.
20. Whitesides G.M., et al. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 3:335-373.
21. Mrksich M., Whitesides G.M. Patterning self-assembled monolayers using microcontact printing - a new technology for biosensors. Trends in Biotechnology 1995, 13:228-235.
22. Wadu-Mesthrige K., et al. Immobilization of proteins on self-assembled monolayers. Scanning 2000, 22:380-388.
23. Chen S.F., et al. Controlling antibody orientation on charged self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 2003, 19:2859-2864.
24. Pannier A.K., et al. Substrate-mediated delivery from self-assembled monolayers: effect of surface ionization, hydrophilicity, and patterning. Acta Biomaterialia 2005, 1:511-522.
25. Pannier A.K., et al. Surface polyethylene glycol enhances substrate-mediated gene delivery by nonspecifically immobilized complexes. Acta Biomaterialia 2008, 4:26-39.
26. Prime K.L., Whitesides G.M. Adsorption of proteins onto surfaces containing end-attached oligo(ethylene oxide) - a model system using self-assembled monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115:10714-10721.
27. Harder P., et al. Molecular conformation in oligo(ethylene glycol)-terminated self-assembled monolayers on gold and silver surfaces determines their ability to resist protein adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102:426-436.
28. Gersbach C.A., et al. Biomaterial-mediated retroviral gene transfer using self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5121-5127.
29. Hennemann B., et al. High-efficiency retroviral transduction of mammalian cells on positively charged surfaces. Hum. Gene Ther. 2000, 11:43-51.
30. Hanenberg H., et al. Colocalization of retrovirus and target cells on specific fibronectin fragments increases genetic transduction of mammalian cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2:876-882.
31. Pirone D.M., et al. Spatial patterning of gene expression using surface-immobilized recombinant adenovirus. Biomed. Microdevices 2008, 10:561-566.
32. Peckys D.B., et al. End-specific strategies of attachment of long double stranded DNA onto gold-coated nanofiber arrays. Nanotechnology 2008, 1-9.
33. Peckys D.B., et al. Immobilization and release strategies for DNA delivery using carbon nanofiber arrays and self-assembled monolayers. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:p145304.
34. Davis M.E., Brewster M.E. Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 2004, 3:1023-1035.
35. Cromwell W.C., et al. Cyclodextrin adamantanecarboxylate inclusion complexes - studies of the variation in cavity size. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89:326-332.
36. Pun S.H., Davis M.E. Development of a nonviral gene delivery vehicle for systemic application. Bioconjug. Chem. 2002, 13:630-639.
37. Bellocq N.C., et al. Transferrin-containing, cyclodextrin polymer-based particles for tumor-targeted gene delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 2003, 14:1122-1132.
38. Davis M.E., et al. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature 2010, 464:1067-1140.
39. Park I.K., et al. Supramolecular assembly of cyclodextrin-based nanoparticles on solid surfaces for gene delivery. Langmuir 2006, 22:8478-8484.
40. Kruppa M., Konig B. Reversible coordinative bonds in molecular recognition. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106:3520-3560.
41. Wang C.H.K., et al. Localized cell-uptake of His-tagged polyplexes immobilized on NTA self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 2010, 26:15445-15452.
42. Nieba L., et al. BIACORE analysis of histidine-tagged proteins using a chelating NTA sensor chip. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 252:217-228.
43. Lata S., Piehler J. Stable and functional immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins via multivalent chelator headgroups on a molecular poly(ethylene glycol) brush. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:1096-1105.
44. Valiokas R., et al. Self-assembled monolayers containing terminal mono-, bis-, and tris-nitrilotriacetic acid groups: characterization and application. Langmuir 2008, 24:4959-4967.
45. Levy R.J., et al. Localized adenovirus gene delivery using antiviral IgG complexation. Gene Ther. 2001, 8:659-667.
46. Klugherz B.D., et al. Gene delivery to pig coronary arteries from stents carrying antibody-tethered adenovirus. Hum. Gene Ther. 2002, 13:443-454.
47. Jin X., et al. Immobilization of plasmid DNA on an anti-DNA antibody modified coronary stent for intravascular site-specific gene therapy. J. Gene Med. 2008, 10:421-429.
48. Stachelek S.J., et al. Localized gene delivery using antibody tethered adenovirus from polyurethane heart valve cusps and intra-aortic implants. Gene Ther. 2004, 11:15-24.
49. Mei L., et al. Immobilization of gene vectors on polyurethane surfaces using a monoclonal antibody for localized gene delivery. J. Gene Med. 2006, 8:690-698.
50. Nelson K.E., et al. Surface characterization of mixed self-assembled monolayers designed for streptavidin immobilization. Langmuir 2001, 17:2807-2816.
51. Schaferling M., et al. Functionalized self-assembled monolayers on gold as binding matrices for the screening of antibody-antigen interactions. Microchimica Acta 2003, 142:193-203.
52. Taylor A.D., et al. Quantitative and simultaneous detection of four foodborne bacterial pathogens with a multi-channel SPR sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 22:752-758.
53. Ladd J., et al. DNA-directed protein immobilization on mixed self-assembled monolayers via a Streptavidin bridge. Langmuir 2004, 20:8090-8095.
54. Shumaker-Parry J.S., et al. Microspotting streptavidin and double-stranded DNA Arrays on gold for high-throughput studies of protein-DNA interactions by surface plasmon resonance microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:918-929.
55. Segura T., Shea L.D. Surface-tethered DNA complexes for enhanced gene delivery. Bioconjugate Chem. 2002, 13:621-629.
56. Segura T., et al. Substrate-mediated DNA delivery: role of the cationic polymer structure and extent of modification. J. Control. Release 2003, 93:69-84.
57. Jeon Y.J., et al. Novel molecular drug carrier: encapsulation of oxaliplatin in cucurbit[7]uril and its effects on stability and reactivity of the drug. Org. Biom. Chem. 2005, 3:2122-2125.
58. Aoyama Y., et al. Artificial viruses and their application to gene delivery. Size-controlled gene coating with glycocluster nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125:3455-3457.
59. Aoyama Y. Glycovirus. Trends Glycosci. Glyc. 2005, 17:39-47.
60. Hwang I., et al. Noncovalent immobilization of proteins on a solid surface by cucurbit 7 uril-ferrocenemethylammonium pair, a potential replacement of biotin-avidin pair. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129:4170-4171.
61. Zhang L.Y., et al. Sequence-specific DNA detection by using biocatalyzed electrochemiluminescence and non-fouling surfaces. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 25:368-372.
62. Boozer C., et al. DNA directed protein immobilization on mixed ssDNA/oligo(ethylene glycol) self-assembled monolayers for sensitive biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:6967-6972.
63. Boozer C., et al. DNA-directed protein immobilization for simultaneous detection of multiple analytes by surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:1515-1519.
64. Flynn N.T., et al. Long-term stability of self-assembled monolayers in biological media. Langmuir 2003, 19:10909-10915.
65. Maciel J., et al. The stability of self-assembled monolayers with time and under biological conditions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 94A:833-843.
66. Mahapatro A., et al. Drug delivery from therapeutic self-assembled monolayers (T-SAMs) on 316L stainless steel. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8:281-289.
67. Mani G., et al. Interaction of endothelial cells with self-assembled monolayers for potential use in drug-eluting coronary stents. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B-Appl. Biomater. 2009, 90B:789-801.
68. Fishbein I., et al. Bisphosphonate-mediated gene vector delivery from the metal surfaces ot stents. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:159-164.
69. Kim T.G., et al. Controlled gene-eluting metal stent fabricated by bio-inspired surface modification with hyaluronic acid and deposition of DNA/PEI polyplexes. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 384:181-188.
70. Ziauddin J., Sabatini D.M. Microarrays of cells expressing defined cDNAs. Nature 2001, 411:107-110.
71. Yamauchi F., et al. Micropatterned, self-assembled monolayers for fabrication of transfected cell microarrays. Biochim. Biophy. Acta-Gen. Sub. 2004, 1672:138-147.
72. Fujimoto H., et al. Prolonged durability of electroporation microarrays as a result of addition of saccharides to nucleic acids. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 393:607-614.
73. Fujimoto H., et al. Fabrication of cell-based arrays using micropatterned alkanethiol monolayers for the parallel silencing of specific genes by small interfering RNA. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006, 17:1404-1410.
74. Rink J.S., et al. Transfection of pancreatic islets using polyvalent DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Surgery 2010, 148:335-345.
75. Giljohann D.A., et al. Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:2072-2073.
76. Hu C., et al. Low Molecular Weight Polyethylenimine Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles as Efficient Gene Vectors. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21:836-843.
77. Barhoumi A., et al. Light-induced release of DNA from plasmon-resonant nanoparticles: Towards light-controlled gene therapy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 482:171-179.
78. Giljohann D.A., et al. Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2010, 49:3280-3294.
79. Boisselier E., Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38:1759-1782.
80. Boeckle S., et al. Purification of polyethylenimine polyplexes highlights the role of free polycations in gene transfer. J. Gene Med. 2004, 6:1102-1111.