Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5year olds

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 458-478

  Wonnacott, Elizabeth ^a   Boyd, Jeremy K ^b   Thomson, Jennifer ^a   Goldberg, Adele E ^c  

^a Department of Experimental Psychology ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial language learning; Novel construction learning; Statistical learning; Verb argument structures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857688906     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbot-Smith K., Lieven E., Tomasello M. What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development 2001, 16:679-692.
2. Abbot-Smith K., Lieven E.V.M., Tomasello M. Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development 2008, 23:48-66.
3. Ahrens, Kathleen (1995). The meaning of double object construction in Chinese. In Proceedings of the sixth North American conference on Chinese linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 1-10). Los Angeles: GSIL, University of Southern California.
4. Akhtar N. Acquiring word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language 1999, 26:339-356.
5. Akhtar N., Tomasello M. Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology 1997, 33:952-965.
6. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Baker C.L. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 1979, 10:533-581.
8. Bar{eth}dal Jóhanna. Productivity: Evidence form case and argument structure in Icelandic 2008, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
9. Bates E., MacWhinney B. Competition, variation, and language learning. Mechanisms of language acquisition 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. B. MacWhinney (Ed.).
10. Bever T. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language 1970, Vol. 279:279-362. Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.
11. Bolinger D. Meaning and form 1977, Longman, London.
12. Bowerman M. Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: Implications of developmental errors with causative verbs. Quaderni di Semantica 1982, 3:5-66.
13. Boyd J.K., Goldberg A.E. Input effects within a constructionist framework. Journal of Modern Language 2009, 93:418-429.
14. Boyd J.K., Goldberg A.E. Young children fail to fully generalize a novel argument structure construction when exposed to the same input as older learners. Journal of Child Language 2011.
15. Boyd J.K., Gottschalk E., Goldberg A.E. Linking rule acquisition in novel phrasal constructions. Language Learning 2009, 59:64-89.
16. Braine M.D.S. On learning the grammatical order of words. Psychological Review 1963, 70:323-348.
17. Braine M.D.S. Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the society for research in child development 1976, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Bybee J.L. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form 1985, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19. Casenhiser D., Goldberg A.E. Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 2005, 8:500-508.
20. Chang F., Kobayashi T., Amano S. Social factors in the acquisition of a new word order. First Language 2009, 29:427-445.
21. Childers J., Tomasello M. The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:730-748.
22. Clark E.V. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. Mechanisms of language acquisition 1987, 1-33. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. B. MacWhinney (Ed.).
23. Dittmar M., Abbot-Smith K., Lieven E., Tomasello T. Young German children's early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science 2008, 11:582-585.
24. Fillmore C.J. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory 1968, 1-88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. E. Bach, R.T. Harms (Eds.).
25. Fisher C. Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretation of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 31:41-81.
26. Fisher C. The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition 2002, 82:259-278.
27. Gerken L.A. Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition 2006, 98:B67-B74.
28. Gertner Y., Fisher C., Eisengart J. Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science 2006, 17:684-691.
29. Gleitman L., Cassidy K., Nappa R., Papafragou A., Trueswell J.C. Hard words. Language Learning and Development 2005, 1:23-64.
30. Goldberg A.E. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure 1995, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
31. Goldberg A.E., Casenhiser D.M., Sethuraman N. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 2004, 14:289-316.
32. Goldwater M.B., Markman A.B. Constructional sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Linguistics 2009, 20:675-702.
33. Gomez R.L. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science 2002, 13:431-436.
34. Gomez R.L., Gerken L.D.A.-M.L. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 1999, 70:109-135.
35. Grimshaw Jane. Argument structure 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
36. Hudson Kam C.L., Newport E.L. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 2005, 1:151-195.
37. Hudson Kam C.L., Newport E.L. Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:30-66.
38. Ingram D., Thompson W. Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the modal hypothesis. Language 1996, 72:97-120.
39. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:434-446.
40. Johnson, M., & Goldberg, A. E. (submitted for publication a). Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs. Princeton University.
41. Johnson, M., & Goldberg, A. E. (submitted for publication b) Concrete similarity among exemplars facilitates the initial implicit learning of a constrained category. Princeton University.
42. Kako E. The semantics of syntactic frames. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21:562-575.
43. Kaschak M.P., Glenberg A.M. Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language 2000, 43:508-529.
44. Landau B., Gleitman L.R. Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child 1985, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Lieven E., Pine J., Baldwin G. Lexically-based learning and the development of grammar in early multi-word speech. Journal of Child Language 1997, 24:187-219.
46. Matthews D., Lieven E., Theakston A., Tomasello M. The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development 2005, 20:121-136. 10.1016/JC.2004.08.001.
47. Naigles L. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 1990, 17:357-374.
48. Perfors A., Tenenbaum J., Wonnacott E. Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language 2010, 37:607-642.
49. Perfors A., Wonnacott E. Bayesian modeling of sources of constraint in language acquisition. Experience, variation, and generalization: Learning a first language 2011, 277-294. John Benjamins Publishing Company. I. Arnon, E. Clark (Eds.).
50. Pinker S. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure 1989, MIT Press.
51. Plunkett K., Marchman V. U-shaped learning and frequency-effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 1991, 38:43-102.
52. Quené Hugo., van den Bergh Huub Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:413-425.
53. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
54. Rovee-Collier C. The development of infant memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1999, 8:80-85.
55. Strobl C., Malley J., Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 2009, 14:323-348.
56. Suttle L., Goldberg A.E. Partial productivity of argument structure constructions. Linguistics 2011, 49:1237-1269.
57. Tomasello M. First verbs: A case study in early grammatical development 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Tomasello M. Do young children have adult syntactic competence?. Cognition 2000, 74:209-253.
59. Wonnacott E. Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 65:1-14.
60. Wonnacott E., Newport E.L., Tanenhaus M.K. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology 2008, 56:165-209.
61. Xu F., Tenenbaum J.B. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 2007, 114:245-272.
62. Year J., Gordon P. Korean speakers' acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal 2009, 93:399-417.