Brief report: Differentiation efficiency of induced pluripotent stem cells depends on the number of reprogramming factors

Stem Cells

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 570-579

  Löhle, Matthias ^a,b   Hermann, Andreas ^a,b   Glaß, Hannes ^a   Kempe, Andrea ^a   Schwarz, Sigrid C ^c   Kim, Jeong Beom ^d,e   Poulet, Claire ^a   Ravens, Ursula ^a   Schwarz, Johannes ^c   Schöler, Hans R ^d   Storch, Alexander ^a,b,f  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE THERAPIES DRESDEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOMEDICINE   (Germany)

^e Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^f GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adult neural stem cells; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Neurogenesis; Reprogramming; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; CD31 ANTIGEN; DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGEN; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; MTAP2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; NERVE PROTEIN; NESTIN; POU5F1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 2;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; MOUSE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; STROMA CELL; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; COCULTURE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

MURINAE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD31; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEINS; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MICE; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NEURAL STEM CELLS; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; RATS; STROMAL CELLS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-2;

EID: 84857485529     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1016     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55-70.
2. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663-676. (Pubitemid 44233629)
3. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007; 131:861-872. (Pubitemid 350138099)
4. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007;448:313-317. (Pubitemid 47080336)
5. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007;448:318-324. (Pubitemid 47080337)
6. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007;318: 1917-1920.
7. Hochedlinger K, Yamada Y, Beard C et al. Ectopic expression of Oct-4 blocks progenitor-cell differentiation and causes dysplasia in epithelial tissues. Cell 2005;121:465-477. (Pubitemid 40692305)
8. Foster KW, Liu Z, Nail CD et al. Induction of KLF4 in basal keratinocytes blocks the proliferation-differentiation switch and initiates squamous epithelial dysplasia. Oncogene 2005;24:1491-1500. (Pubitemid 40396079)
9. Kaji K, Norrby K, Paca A et al. Virus-free induction of pluripotency and subsequent excision of reprogramming factors. Nature 2009;458: 771-775.
10. Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H et al. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science 2008; 322:949-953.
11. Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Beard C et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 2009;136:964-977.
12. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 2008;322:945-949.
13. Woltjen K, Michael IP, Mohseni P et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2009;458: 766-770.
14. Yu J, Hu K, Smuga-Otto K et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences. Science 2009;324:797-801.
15. Zhou H, Wu S, Joo JY et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell 2009;4:381-384.
16. Kim D, Kim CH, Moon JI et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell 2009;4:472-476.
17. Warren L, Manos PD, Ahfeldt T et al. Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:618-630.
18. Eminli S, Utikal J, Arnold K et al. Reprogramming of neural progenitor cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2 expression. Stem Cells 2008;26:2467-2474.
19. Hester ME, Song S, Miranda CJ et al. Two factor reprogramming of human neural stem cells into pluripotency. PLoS One 2009;4:e7044.
20. Huangfu D, Osafune K, Maehr R et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1269-1275.
21. Kim JB, Greber B, Arauzo-Bravo MJ et al. Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature 2009;461:649-653.
22. Kim JB, Sebastiano V, Wu G et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell 2009;136:411-419.
23. Kim JB, Zaehres H, Wu G et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 2008;454:646-650.
24. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:101-106.
25. Shi Y, Do JT, Desponts C et al. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:525-528. (Pubitemid 351729222)
26. Wernig M, Meissner A, Cassady JP et al. c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2: 10-12.
27. Zhu S, Li W, Zhou H et al. Reprogramming of human primary somatic cells by OCT4 and chemical compounds. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7:651-655.
28. Kawasaki H, Mizuseki K, Nishikawa S et al. Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from ES cells by stromal cell-derived inducing activity. Neuron 2000;28:31-40.
29. Vodyanik MA, Slukvin II. Hematoendothelial differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2007; Chapter 23:Unit 23.6.
30. Nakano T, Kodama H, Honjo T. Generation of lymphohematopoietic cells from embryonic stem cells in culture. Science 1994;265:1098-1101. (Pubitemid 24293078)
31. Kodama H, Nose M, Niida S et al. Involvement of the c-kit receptor in the adhesion of hematopoietic stem cells to stromal cells. Exp Hematol 1994;22:979-984. (Pubitemid 24292889)
32. Zhang WJ, Park C, Arentson E et al. Modulation of hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation from mouse embryonic stem cells by different culture conditions. Blood 2005;105:111-114. (Pubitemid 40053071)
33. Kim K, Doi A, Wen B et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2010;467:285-290.
34. Muller WA, Ratti CM, McDonnell SL et al. A human endothelial cell-restricted, externally disposed plasmalemmal protein enriched in intercellular junctions. J Exp Med 1989;170:399-414. (Pubitemid 19204271)
35. Newman PJ, Berndt MC, Gorski J et al. PECAM-1 (CD31) cloning and relation to adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. Science 1990;247:1219-1222.
36. Yamaguchi TP, Dumont DJ, Conlon RA et al. Flk-1, an flt-related receptor tyrosine kinase is an early marker for endothelial cell precursors. Development 1993;118:489-498. (Pubitemid 23214035)
37. Sridharan R, Tchieu J, Mason MJ et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 2009;136: 364-377.
38. Dominguez-Sola D, Ying CY, Grandori C et al. Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc. Nature 2007;448:445-451. (Pubitemid 47123512)
39. Knoepfler PS, Zhang XY, Cheng PF et al. Myc influences global chromatin structure. EMBO J 2006;25:2723-2734. (Pubitemid 43980380)
40. Kim J, Chu J, Shen X et al. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008;132:1049-1061. (Pubitemid 351381745)
41. Kim J, Woo AJ, Chu J et al. A Myc network accounts for similarities between embryonic stem and cancer cell transcription programs. Cell 2010;143:313-324.
42. Araki R, Hoki Y, Uda M et al. Crucial role of c-Myc in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2011;29: 1362-1370.