Environmental enrichment of laboratory rodents: The answer depends on the question

Comparative Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 314-321

  Toth, Linda A ^a   Kregel, Kevin ^b   Leon, Lisa ^c   Musch, Timothy I ^d  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c U S ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; CYTOCHROME P450 1A1;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL GENETICS; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELLBEING; BACTERIAL LOAD; BRAIN DAMAGE; CAGE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; DISEASE MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; EPILEPSY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE INDUCTION; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HEALTH STATUS; LIVER INJURY; LOCOMOTION; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RODENT; SOCIAL ISOLATION; STEREOTYPY; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STROKE; TRANSGENIC MOUSE; TREADMILL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; HOUSING, ANIMAL; SEX FACTORS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84857471455     PISSN: 15320820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Abramov U, Puussaar T, Raud S, Kurrikoff K, Vasar E. 2008. Behavioural differences between C57BL/6 and 129S6/SvEv strains are reinforced by environmental enrichment. Neurosci Lett 443:223-227.
2. Abramov U, Raud S, Innos J, Lasner H, Kurrikoff K, Tuma T, Puussaar T, Okya K, Matsui T, Vasar E. 2008. Different housing conditions alter the behavioural phenotype of CCK(2) receptor-deficient mice. Behav Brain Res 193:108-116.
3. Armstrong KR, Clark TR, Peterson MR. 1998. Use of cornhusk nesting material to reduce aggression in caged mice. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 37:64-66. (Pubitemid 128531050)
4. Augustsson H, Van de Weerd HA, Kruitwagen CLJH, Baumans V. 2003. Effects of enrichment on variation and results in the light/ dark test. Lab Anim 37:328-340. (Pubitemid 37297043)
5. Bayne K. 2005. Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results. ILAR J 46:129-139. (Pubitemid 40514521)
6. Benefiel AC, Dong WK, Greenough WT. 2005. Mandatory 'enriched' housing of laboratory animals: the need for evidence-based evaluation. ILAR J 46:95-105. (Pubitemid 40514518)
7. Bergmann BM, Seiden LS, Landis CA, Gilliland MA, Rechtschaffen A. 1994. Sleep deprivation in the rat: XVIII. Regional brain levels of monoamines and their metabolites. Sleep 17:583-589. (Pubitemid 24348449)
8. Bjartmar L, Alkhori L, Ruud J, Mohammed AH, Marcusson J, Hallbeck M. 2010. Long-term treatment with antidepressants, but not environmental stimulation, induces expression of NP2 mRNA in hippocampus and medial habenula. Brain Res 1328:25-33.
9. Burrows EL, McOmish CE, Hannan AJ. 2010. Gene-environment interactions and construct validity in preclinical models of psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print].
10. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. 1999. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284:1670-1672. (Pubitemid 29291377)
11. Csatadi K, Kustos K, Eiben C, Bilko A, Altbacker V. 2005. Even minimal human contact linked to nursing reduces fear responses toward humans in rabbits. Appl Anim Behav Sci 95:123-128. (Pubitemid 41562052)
12. Curtis SE. 1985. What constitutes animal wellbeing?, p 1-14. In: Moberg GP, editor. Animal stress. Bethesda (MD): American Physiological Society.
13. Dhanushkodi A, Shetty AK. 2008. Is exposure to enriched environment beneficial for functional postlesional recovery in temporal lobe epilepsy? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:657-674.
14. Eskola S, Lauhikara M, Voipio HM, Laitinen T, Nevalainen T. 1999. Environmental enrichment may alter the number of rats needed to achieve statistical significance. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 26:134-144.
15. Festing MF. 1986. The case for isogenic strains in toxicological screening. Arch Toxicol Suppl 9:127-137. (Pubitemid 17048253)
16. Festing MF. 1999. Reduction in animal use in the production and testing of biologicals. Dev Biol Stand 101:195-200.
17. Galef BG, Beck M. 1990. Diet selection and poison avoidance by mammals individually and in social groups, p 329-349. In: Stricker EM, editor. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: neurobiology of food and fluid intake. New York (NY): Plenum Press.
18. Garner JP. 2005. Stereotypies and other abnormal repetitive behaviors: potential impact on validity, reliability, and replicability of scientific outcomes. ILAR J 46:106-117. (Pubitemid 40514519)
19. Gartner K. 1990. A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype: a reason for the limited success of a 30-year-long effort to standardize laboratory animals? Lab Anim 24:71-77. (Pubitemid 20078294)
20. Gordon CJ. 2004. Effect of cage bedding on temperature regulation and metabolism of group-housed female mice. Comp Med 54:63-68. (Pubitemid 38295864)
21. Gortz N, Lewejohann L, Tomm M, Ambre O, Keyvani K, Paulus W, Sachser N. 2008. Efects of environmental enrichment on exploration, anxiety, and memory in female TgCRND8 Alzheimer mice. Behav Brain Res 191:43-48.
22. Gross AN, Engel AK, Richter SH, Garner JP, Wurbel H. 2011. Cage-induced stereotypies in female ICR CD1 mice do not correlate with recurrent perseveration. Behav Brain Res 216:613-620.
23. Haemisch A, Gartner K. 1997. Effects of cage enrichment on territorial aggression and stress physiology in male laboratory mice. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 640:73-76. (Pubitemid 27496285)
24. Haemisch A, Voss T, Gartner K. 1994. Effects of environmental enrichment on aggressive behavior, dominance hierarchies, and endocrine states in male DBA/2J mice. Physiol Behav 56:1041-1048. (Pubitemid 24337123)
25. Hess SE, Rohr S, Dufour BD, Gaskill BN, Pajor EA, Garner JP. 2008. Home improvement: C57BL/6J mice given more naturalistic nesting materials build better nests. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 47:25-31.
26. Hooijmans CR, De Vries R, Leenaars M, Curfs J, Ritskes-Hoitinga M. 2011. Improving planning, design, reporting, and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 162:1259-1260.
27. Hunt C, Hambly C. 2006. Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group-housed males. Physiol Behav 87:519-526. (Pubitemid 43356686)
28. Jezierski TA, Konecka AM. 1996. Handling and rearing results in young rabbits. Appl Anim Behav Sci 46:243-250. (Pubitemid 126649382)
29. Johnson RF, Beltz TG, Thunhorst RL, Johnson AK. 2003. Investigations on the physiological controls of water and saline intake in C57BL/6 mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285:R394-R403. (Pubitemid 36898909)
30. Kafkafi N, Benjamini Y, Sakov A, Elmer GI, Golani I. 2005. Genotype-environment interactions in mouse behavior: a way out of the problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4619-4624. (Pubitemid 40397161)
31. Kemppinen NM, Meier AS, Mauranen KO, Kohila TT, Nevalainen TO. 2009. The effect of dividing walls, a tunnel, and restricted feeding on cardiovascular responses to cage change and gavage in rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 48:157-165.
32. Kersten AMP, Meijesser FM, Metz JHM. 1989. Effects of early handling on later open-field behaviour in rabbits. Appl Anim Behav Sci 24:157-167.
33. Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MF, Cuthill IC, Fry D, Hutton J, Altman DG. 2009. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis, and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE 4:e7824.
34. Koike H, Ibi D, Mizoguchi H, Nagai T, Nitta A, Takuma K, Nabeshima T, Yoneda Y, Yamada K. 2009. Behavioral abnormality and pharmacologic response in social-isolation-reared mice. Behav Brain Res 202:114-121.
35. Konkle AT, Kentner AC, Baker SL, Stewart A, Bielajew C. 2010. Environmental-enrichment-related variations in behavioral, biochemical, and physiologic responses of Sprague-Dawley and Long- Evans rats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 49:427-436.
36. Kostomitsopoulos NG, Paronis F, Alexakos P, Balafas E, Van Loo P, Baumans V. 2007. The influence of the location of a nest box in an individually ventilated cage on the preference of mice to use it. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 10:111-121. (Pubitemid 47034357)
37. Kuhnen G. 1999. The effect of cage size and enrichment on core temperature and febrile response of the golden hamster. Lab Anim 33:221-227. (Pubitemid 29364160)
38. Laber K, Veatch LM, Lopes MF, Mulligan JK, Lathers DM. 2008. Effects of housing density on weight gain, immune function, behavior, and plasma corticosterone concentrations in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 47:16-23. (Pubitemid 351498144)
39. Latham N, Mason G. 2010. Frustration and perseveration in stereotypic captive animals: is a taste of enrichment worse than none at all? Behav Brain Res 211:96-104.
40. Laviola G, Hannan AJ, Macri S, Solinas M, Jaber M. 2008. Effects of enriched environment on animal models of neurodegenrerative diseases and psychiatric disorders. Neurobiol Dis 31:159-168.
41. Lewejohann L, Reinhard C, Schrewe A, Bradnewiede J, Haemisch A, Gortz N, Schachner M, Sachser N. 2006. Environmental bias? Effects of housing conditions, laboratory environment, and experimenter on behavioral tests. Genes Brain Behav 5:64-72.
42. Macleod MR, Fisher M, O'Collins V, Sena ES, Dimagl U, Bath PM, Buchan A, van der Worp HB, Traystman R, Minimatsu K, Donnan GA, Howells DW. 2009. Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Stroke 40:e50-e52.
43. Marashi V, Barnekow A, Ossendorf E, Sachser N. 2003. Effects of different forms of environmental enrichment on behavioral, endocrinological, and immunological parameters in male mice. Horm Behav 43:281-292. (Pubitemid 36411827)
44. Martin B, Ji S, Maudsley S, Mattson MP. 2010. 'Control' laboratory rodents are metabolically morbid: why it matters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6127-6133.
45. Mattson MP, Duan W, Lee J, Guo Z. 2001. Suppression of brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders by dietary restriction and environmental enrichment: molecular mechanisms. Mech Ageing Dev 122:757-778. (Pubitemid 32378724)
46. Mattson MP, Duan W, Wan R, Guo Z. 2004. Prophylactic activation of neuroprotective stress response pathways by dietary and behavioral manipulations. NeuroRx 1:111-116. (Pubitemid 46589344)
47. Mering S, Kaliste-Korhonen E, Nevalainen T. 2001. Estimates of approximate numbers of rats: interaction with housing environment. Lab Anim 35:80-90. (Pubitemid 32061608)
48. National Research Council. 1992. Recognition and alleviation of pain and distress in animals. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
49. Nevison CM, Hurst JL, Barnard CJ. 1999. Strain-specific effects of cage enrichment in male laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Anim Welf 8:361-379. (Pubitemid 129619720)
50. Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. 2006. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity, and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:697-709. (Pubitemid 44267494)
51. Oliva AM, Salcedo E, Hellier JL, Ly X, Koka K, Tollin DJ, Restrepo D. 2010. Toward a mouse neuroethology in the laboratory environment. PLoS ONE 5:e11359.
52. Olsson IA, Costa A, Nobrega C, Roque S, Correia-Neves M. 2010. Environmental enrichment does not compromise the immune response in mice chronically infected with Mycobacterium avium. Scand J Immunol 71:249-257.
53. Olsson IA, Dahlborn K. 2002. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of environmental enrichment. Lab Anim 36:243-270. (Pubitemid 34785762)
54. Pare WP, Vincent GP, Natelson BH. 1985. Daily feeding schedule and housing on incidence of activity-stress ulcer. Physiol Behav 34:423-429. (Pubitemid 15114614)
55. Patterson-Kane E. 2010. Thinking outside our cages. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 13:96-99.
56. Pawlowicz A, Demner A, Lewis MH. 2010. Effects of access to voluntary wheel running on the development of stereotypy. Behav Processes 83:242-246.
57. Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, Wheble P, Briscoa C, Sandercock P, Macleod M, Mignini LE, Jayaram P, Khan KS. 2007. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 334:197-203.
58. Pongracz P, Altbacker V, Fenes D. 2001. Human handling might interfere with conspecific recognition in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Dev Psychobiol 39:53-62. (Pubitemid 32619384)
59. Rice AS, Cimino-Brown D, Eisenach JC, Kontinen VK, Lacroix- Fralish MK, Machin I, Mogil JS, Stohr T. 2008. Animal models and the prediction of efficacy in clinical trials of analgesic drugs: a critical appraisal and call for uniform reporting standards. Pain 139:243-247.
60. Richter H, Ambree O, Lewejohann L, Herring A, Keyvani K, Paulus W, Palme R, Touma C, Schabitz WR, Sachser N. 2008. Wheel-running in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: protection or symptom? Behav Brain Res 190:74-84.
61. Richter SH, Garner JP, Auer C, Kunert J, Wurbel H. 2010. Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments. Nat Methods 7:167-168.
62. Richter SH, Garner JP, Wurbel H. 2009. Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments? Nat Methods 6:257-261.
63. Segovia G, del Arco A, Mora F. 2009. Environmental enrichment, prefrontal cortex, stress, and aging of the brain. J Neural Transm 116:1007-1016.
64. Silver LM. 1995. Mouse genetics: concepts and applications. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
65. Sparling JE, Mahoney M, Baker S, Bielajew C. 2010. The effects of gestational and postpartum environmental enrichment on the mother rat: a preliminary investigation. Behav Brain Res 208:213-223.
66. Stairs DJ, Bardo MT. 2009. Neurobehavioral effects of environmental enrichment and drug abuse vulnerability. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:377-382.
67. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M. 2003. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 289:1278-1287. (Pubitemid 37432909)
68. Tischkau SA, Mukai M. 2009. Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by cotton balls used for environmental enrichment. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 48:357-362.
69. Tsai PP, Oppermann D, Stelzer HD, Mahler M, Hackbarth H. 2003. The effects of different rack systems on the breeding performance of DBA/2 mice. Lab Anim 37:44-53. (Pubitemid 36143327)
70. Tsai PP, Pachowsky U, Stelzer HD, Hackbarth H. 2002. Impact of environmental enrichment in mice: 1. Effects of housing conditions on body weight, organ weights, and hematology in different strains. Lab Anim 36:411-419. (Pubitemid 35192156)
71. Tsai PP, Stelzer HD, Hedrich HJ, Hackbarth H. 2003. Are the effects of different enrichment designs on the physiology and behaviour of DBA/2 mice consistent. Lab Anim 37:314-327. (Pubitemid 37297042)
72. Tsai PP, Stelzer HD, Schraepler A, Hackbarth H. 2006. Importance and effects of enrichment on physiology, behavior, and breeding performance in mice. ALTEX 23 Suppl:96-98.
73. Tucci V, Lad HV, Parker A, Polley S, Brown SD, Nolan PM. 2006. Gene-environment interactions differentially affect mouse strain behavioral parameters. Mamm Genome 17:1113-1120. (Pubitemid 44764289)
74. Van de Weerd HA, van Loo PLP, Van Zutphen LFM, Koolhaas JM, Baumans V. 1997. Nesting material as environmental enrichment has no adverse effects on behavior and physiology of laboratory mice. Physiol Behav 62:1019-1028. (Pubitemid 27425231)
75. van Loo PLP, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Koolhaas JM, Van de Weerd HA, Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V. 2002. Influence of cage enrichment on aggressive behaviour and physiological parameters in male mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci 76:65-81. (Pubitemid 34134825)
76. van Loo PLP, Van der Meer E, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Koolhaas JM, Van Zupthen LFM, Baumans V. 2003. Strain-specific aggressive behavior of male mice submitted to different husbandry procedures. Aggress Behav 29:69-80.
77. van Loo PLP, Van der Meer E, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Koolhaas JM, Van Zupthen LFM, Baumans V. 2004. Long-term effects of husbandry procedures on stress-related parameters in male mice of 2 strains. Lab Anim 38:169-177. (Pubitemid 38586430)
78. Wahlsten D. 2001. Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: reasons, recommendations, and reality. Physiol Behav 73:695-704. (Pubitemid 32885559)
79. Wahlsten D, Bachmanov A, Finn DA, Crabbe JC. 2006. Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16364-16369. (Pubitemid 44715202)
80. Wahlsten D, Metten P, Phillips TJ, Boehm SL, Burkhart-Kasch S, Dorow J, Doerksen S, Downing C, Fogarty J, Rodd-Henricks K, Hen R, McKinnon CS, Merrill CM, Nolte C, Schalomon M, Schlumbohm JP, Sibert JR, Wenger CD, Dudek BC, Crabbe JC. 2003. Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J Neurobiol 54:283-311. (Pubitemid 36050068)
81. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. 2007. Practice-based research: blue highways on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 297:403-406. (Pubitemid 46155803)
82. Whitaker J, Moy SS, Godfrey V, Nielsen J, Bellinger D, Bradfield J. 2009. Effects of cage size and enrichment on reproductive performance and behavior in C57BL/6Tac mice. Lab Anim (NY) 38:24-34.
83. Whitaker J, Moy SS, Saville BR, Godfrey V, Nielsen J, Bellinger D, Bradfield J. 2007. The effect of cage size on reproductive performance and behavior of C57BL/6 mice. Lab Anim (NY) 36:32-39. (Pubitemid 350004712)
84. Wolfer DP, Litvin O, Morf S, Nitsch RM, Lipp HP, Wurbel H. 2004. Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 432:821-822. (Pubitemid 40037135)
85. Woolf SH. 2008. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 299:211-213.
86. Wurbel H. 2001. Ideal homes: housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends Neurosci 24:207-211. (Pubitemid 32204375)
87. Yi I, Bays ME, Stephan FK. 1993. Stress ulcers in rats: the role of food intake, body weight, and time of day. Physiol Behav 54:375-381. (Pubitemid 23211406)