Environmental standardization: Cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 257-261

  Richter, S Helene ^a,b   Garner, Joseph P ^c   Würbel, Hanno ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; LABORATORY TEST; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BIOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, ANIMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 63849179288     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1312     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Animal Welfare Act 22 (Riverdale: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1990).
2. NRC (National Research Council). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Washington, National Academy Press, 1996).
3. Beynen, A.C., Gärtner, K. & van Zutphen, L.F.M. Standardization of animal experimentation In Principles of Laboratory Animal Science (eds., van Zutphen, L.F.M., Baumans, V. & Beynen, A.C.) 103-110 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003).
4. Festing, M.F.W. Good experimental design and statistics can save animals, but how can it be promoted? Altern. Lab. Anim. 32, 133-135 (2004).
5. Festing, M.F.W. Refinement and reduction through the control of variation. Altern. Lab. Anim. 32, 259-263 (2004).
6. Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. Hypothesis testing. In Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (eds., Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J.) 32-57 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).
7. Crabbe, J.C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B.C. Genetics of mouse behaviour: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284, 1670-1672 (1999).
8. Wahlsten, D. Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations, and reality. Physiol. Behav. 73, 695-705 (2001).
9. Würbel, H. Behavioral phenotyping enhanced - beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes Brain Behav. 1, 3-8 (2002).
10. Campbell, D.T. Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol. Bull. 54, 297-312 (1957).
11. Lehner, P.N. Handbook of Ethological Methods, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
12. Guala, F. Experimental localism and external validity. Philos. Sci. 70, 1195-1205 (2003).
13. Van der Staay, F.J. Animal models of behavioral dysfunctions: Basic concepts and classifications, and an evaluation strategy. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 52, 131-159 (2006).
14. Crestani, F., Martin, J.R., Möhler, H. & Rudolph, U. Resolving differences in GABAA receptor mutant mouse studies. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1059 (2000).
15. Wahlsten, D., et al. Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J. Neurobiol. 54 283-311 (2003).
16. Wolfer, D.P. et al. Laboratory animal welfare: Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 432, 821-822 (2004).
17. Kafkafi, N., Benjamini, Y., Sakov, A., Elmer, G.I. & Golani, I. Genotype-environment interactions in mouse behavior: A way out of the problem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4619-4624 (2005).
18. Lewejohann, L. et al. Environmental bias? Effects of housing conditions, laboratory environment and experimenter on behavioral tests. Genes Brain Behav. 5, 64-72 (2006).
19. Mandillo, S. et al. Reliability, robustness and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: A cross-laboratory study. Physiol. Genomics 34, 243-255 (2008).
20. Chesler, E.J., Wilson, S.G., Lariviere, W.R., Rodriguez-Zas, S.L. & Mogil, J.S. Identification and ranking of genetic and laboratory environment factors influencing a behavioral trait, thermal nociception, via computational analysis of a large data archive. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 907-923 (2002).
21. Valdar, W. et al. Genetic and environmental effects on complex traits in mice. Genetics 174, 959-984 (2006).
22. Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D.A. & Crabbe, J.C. Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 16364-16369 (2006).
23. Andrews, N. & File, S.E. Handling history of rats modifies behavioural effects of drugs in the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 235, 109-112 (1993).
24. Rampon, C. et al. Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1-knockout mice. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 238-244 (2000).
25. Cabib, S., Orsini, C., Le Moal, M. & Piazza, P.V. Abolition and reversal of strain differences in behavioural responses to drugs of abuse after brief experience. Science 289, 463-465 (2000).
26. Kas, M.J.H. & Van Ree, J.M. Dissecting complex behaviours in the post-genomic era. Trends Neurosci. 27, 366-369 (2004).
27. Izidio, G.S., Lopes, D.M., Spricigio, L. & Ramos, A. Common variations in the pretest environment influence genotypic comparisons in models of anxiety. Genes Brain Behav. 4, 412-419 (2005).
28. b̈rink, K.J. & Rehbinder, C. Animal definition: A necessity for the validity of animal experiments. Lab. Anim. 34, 121-130 (2000).
29. van der Staay, F.J. & Steckler, T. Behavioural phenotyping of mouse mutants. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 3-12 (2001).
30. van der Staay, F.J. & Steckler, T. The fallacy of behavioral phenotyping without standardisation. Genes Brain Behav. 1, 9-13 (2002).
31. Würbel, H. Behaviour and the standardization fallacy. Nat. Genet. 26, 263 (2000).
32. De Witt, T.J. Scheiner, S.M. Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches. (Oxford University Press, 2004).
33. Latham, N. & Mason, G. From house mouse to mouse house: The behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86, 261-289 (2004).
34. Silver, L.M. Mouse genetics: Concepts and applications (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
35. Silva, A. J., et al. Mutant mice and neuroscience: Recommendations concerning genetic background. Neuron 19, 755-759 (1997).
36. Beynen, A.C., Festing, M.F.M. & van Montfort, M.A.J. Design of animal experiments In Principles of Laboratory Animal Science (eds., van Zutphen, L.F.M., Baumans, V. & Beynen, A.C.) 219-249 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003).
37. Baggerly, K.A. Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics 20, 777 (2004).
38. Anderson, C.A., Lindsay, J.J. & Bushman, B.J. Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 8, 3-9 (1999).
39. Vissers, G., Heyne, G., Peters, V. & Guerts, J. The validity of laboratory research in social and behavioral science. Qual. Quant. 35, 129-145 (2001).
40. Boehm, G.W. et al. Learning and memory in autoimmune BXSB mouse: Effects of neocorticaol ectopias and environmental enrichment. Brain Res. 726, 11-22 (1996).
41. Chapillon, P., Manneche, C., Belzung, C. & Caston, J. Rearing environmental enrichment in two inbred strain of mice: 1. Effects on emotional reactivity. Behav. Genet. 29, 41-46 (1999).
42. +/- mice. PLoS ONE 2, e229, (2007).
43. Hascoet, M., Colombel, M.-C. & Bourin, M. Influence of age on behavioural response in the light/dark paradigm. Physiol. Behav. 66, 567-570 (1999).
44. Imhof, J.T., Coelho, Z.M.I., Schmitt, M.L., Morato, G.S. & Carobrez, A.P. Influence of age and gender on performance of rats in the elevated plus maze apparatus. Behav. Brain Res. 56, 177-180 (1993).
45. Poon, A.M. et al. Effect of cage size on ultradian locomotor rhythms of laboratory mice. Physiol. Behav. 62, 1253-1258 (1997).
46. Soffie, M., Hahn, K., Terao, E. & Eclancher, F. Behavioural and glial changes in old rats following environmental enrichment. Behav. Brain Res. 101, 37-49 (1999).
47. Van de Weerd, H.A., Baumans, V., Koolhaas, J.M. & van Zutphen, L.F. Strain specific behavioral response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. J. Exp. Anim. Sci. 36, 117-127 (1994).
48. Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. The principles of humane experimental technique (Methuen, London, 1959).