Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 366-388

  Higgins, Monica C ^a   Weiner, Jennie ^a   Young, Lissa ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Implementation; Leadership; Organizational change; Strategy; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857403945     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.1773     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Akgün, A., & Lynn, G. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 263-286.
2. Ancona, D. G. (1987). Groups in organizations: Extending laboratory models. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Ancona, D. G., & Bresman, H. (2007). X-teams: How to build teams that lead, innovate, and succeed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
4. Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
5. Barley, S. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting? Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16-20.
6. Baruch, Y. (2006). Career development in organizations and beyond: Balancing traditional and contemporary viewpoints. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 125-138.
7. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
8. Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-59.
9. Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557-591.
10. Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (2002). Understanding and using large system interventions, reprinted. In W. W., Burke, D. G. Lake, & J. W. Paine (Eds.), Organization change: A comprehensive reader (2009). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, Inc.
11. Cannella, A. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2005). A multi-level analysis of the upper-echelons model. In F. Yammarino, & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Multi-level issues in strategy and methods (Research in Multi-Level Issues), (Volume 4, pp. 195-237). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
12. City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
13. Cummings, J., & Higgins, M. C. (2006). Relational instability at the core: Support dynamics in developmental networks. Social Networks, 28(1), 38-55.
14. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
15. Davies, B., & Harre, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43-63.
16. Dimock, H. S., & Sorenson, R. (1955). Designing education in values: A case study in institutional change. New York, NY: Association Press.
17. Donaldson, M., Johnson, S. M., Kirkpatrick, C. L., Marinell, W. H., Steele, J. L., & Szczesiul, S. A. (2008). Angling for access, bartering for change: How second stage teachers experience differentiated roles in schools. Teachers College Record, 110(5), 1088-1114.
18. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 350-383.
19. Elmore, R. F. (2007). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20. Elmore, R. F., & City, E. A. (2007). The road to school improvement. Harvard Education Letter, 23(3), 1-3.
21. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effect of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
22. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
23. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Fullan, M. (2006). Turnaround leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Gardner, H. (2009). Expertise utilization in accounting and consulting teams: The effects of shared representations. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.
27. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
28. Hackman, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2008). Groups as agents of change. In T. Cummings (Ed.), Handbook of organizational development (pp. 167-186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, J. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2001). The Team Diagnostic Survey: An instrument for assessing the structure, dynamics, and leadership of work teams. Boston, MA: Hay McBer.
31. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684.
32. Hansen, M., & Haas, M. (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance: An empirical test of competitive bidding in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1-24.
33. Harre, B., & Van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21(4), 393-407.
34. Higgins, M. C. (2001). Changing careers: The effects of social context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 595-618.
35. Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244-263.
36. Higgins, M. C., Young, L. V., Weiner, J., & Wlodarczyk, S. (2010). Leading teams of leaders: What helps team member learning? Phi Delta Kappan, 91(4), 41-45.
37. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447.
38. Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
39. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1993). Why some differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
40. Johnson, S. M. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41. Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627.
42. Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
43. Kahn, W. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321-349.
44. Kanter, R. M. (2010). Supercorp: How vanguard companies create innovation, profits, growth, and social good. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.
45. Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. K. (2003). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
46. Klein, K., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229.
47. Lewis, S., Passmore, J., & Cantor, S. (2008). Appreciative inquiry for change management. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
48. Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2000). Positioning in practice: Understanding participation in the social world. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(4), 435-453.
49. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional lives. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 510-536.
50. London, M., Polzer, J. T., & Omoregie, H. (2005). Interpersonal congruence, transactive memory, and feedback processes: An integrative model of group learning. Human Resources Development Review, 4(2), 114-135.
51. Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd edn). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52. Mckinsey & Company. (2009). How the world's best performing school systems come out on top. [PDF Document] Retrieved from
53. Morgeson, F. P., & Hoffman, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
54. Mortensen, M., Woolley, A. W., & O'Leary, M. B. (2007). Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership. In K. Crowston, S. Sieber, & E. Wynn (Eds.), Virtuality and virtualization (vol. 236, pp. 215-228). Boston, MA: Springer.
55. O'Leary, M. B., Woolley, A. W., & Mortensen, M. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of productivity and learning effects for individuals, teams, and organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36(3): 461-478.
56. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2006). Racial transformation and the changing nature of segregation. [PDF Document] Retrieved from
57. Schein, E. (1987). Process consultation: Lessons for managers and consultants. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58. Sonenshein, S. (2010). We're changing-or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 477-512.
59. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Stoelinga, S. (2010). Pressuring teachers to leave honest talk about how principals use harassing supervision. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(4), 57.
61. Susskind, L. (2006). Breaking Robert's rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Swann, W. B., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, & Ko, J. S. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 9-27.
63. Swanson, C. (2009). Cities in crisis 2009: Closing the graduation gap (report prepared for America's Promise Alliance). Retrieved from
64. Tobin, R. (1999). Overcoming resistance to change. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
65. Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1997). Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. London: Oxford University Press.
66. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Employee tenure summary. Retrieved from.
67. Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532-547.
68. Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. V. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 373-398.
69. Wageman, R., Nunes, D. A., Burruss, J. A., & Hackman, J. R. (2008). Senior leadership teams: What it takes to make them great. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
70. Watson, G. (1967). Resistance to change, reprinted. In W. W. Burke, D. G. Lake, & J. W. Paine (Eds.), Organization change: A comprehensive reader (2009). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, Inc.
71. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). CEO board power, demographic similarity and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1995.
72. Wheelwright, S., & Clarke, K. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
73. Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91-1.