Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 412-418

  Chou, Chi Ying ^a   Jordan, Charlotte A ^a   McGhee, Charles N J ^a   Patel, Dipika V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PASCAL DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETER; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TONOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857383640     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: 18791891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. C.M. Kirkness, L.A. Ficker Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma Cornea 11 5 1992 427 432
2. J.C. Fan, K. Chow, D.V. Patel, C.N. McGhee Corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation in keratoconus is common following uncomplicated penetrating keratoplasty Eye 23 11 2009 2056 2062
3. H.S. Lee, M.S. Kim Influential factors on the survival of endothelial cells after penetrating keratoplasty Eur J Ophthalmol 19 6 2009 930 935
4. T. Reinhard, D. Bohringer, R. Sundmacher Accelerated chronic endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty in glaucoma eyes J Glaucoma 10 6 2001 446 451 (Pubitemid 34002943)
5. International Organization for Standardization Ophthalmic InstrumentsTonometers: ISO8612:2001 2001 International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland
6. H. Goldmann, T. Schmidt Applanation tonometry Ophthalmologica 134 4 1957 221 242
7. M.C. Grieshaber, A. Schoetzau, C. Zawinka, J. Flammer, S. Orgul Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 125 6 2007 740 744 (Pubitemid 46919733)
8. M. Kohlhaas, A.G. Boehm, E. Spoerl, A. Pursten, H.J. Grein, L.E. Pillunat Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry Arch Ophthalmol 124 4 2006 471 476
9. Y. Huang, C.C. Tham, M. Zhang Central corneal thickness and applanation tonometry J Cataract Refract Surg 34 3 2008 347 (Pubitemid 351625592)
10. J.T. Holladay, M.E. Allison, T.C. Prager Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism Am J Ophthalmol 96 1 1983 90 93 (Pubitemid 13073326)
11. G. Rask, A. Behndig Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings Ophthalmic Res 38 1 2006 49 55 (Pubitemid 41797930)
12. D.S. Rootman, M.S. Insler, H.W. Thompson, J. Parelman, D. Poland, S.R. Unterman Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas Arch Ophthalmol 106 12 1988 1697 1700 (Pubitemid 19000132)
13. C. Kaufmann, L.M. Bachmann, M.A. Thiel Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 9 2003 3790 3794 (Pubitemid 37047947)
14. D.A. Luce Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer J Cataract Refract Surg 31 1 2005 156 162 (Pubitemid 40260703)
15. J.Y. Shin, J.S. Choi, J.Y. Oh, M.K. Kim, J.H. Lee, W.R. Wee Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer Korean J Ophthalmol 24 3 2010 139 142
16. C.N. McGhee, S. Dean, H. Danesh-Meyer Locally administered ocular corticosteroids: benefits and risks Drug Saf 25 1 2002 33 55 (Pubitemid 34208330)
17. N. Ehlers, T. Bramsen, S. Sperling Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness Acta Ophthalmol 53 1 1975 34 43
18. P.S. Phelan, C.N. McGhee, I.G. Bryce Excimer laser PRK and corticosteroid induced IOP elevation: the tip of an emerging iceberg? Br J Ophthalmol 78 10 1994 802 803 (Pubitemid 24311526)
19. S.W. John, J.R. Hagaman, T.E. MacTaggart, L. Peng, O. Smithes Intraocular pressure in inbred mouse strains Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 1 1997 249 253 (Pubitemid 27051543)
20. J. Moreno-Montanes, N. Olmo, J. Zarranz-Ventura, H. Heras-Mulero Dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty Cornea 28 7 2009 836 837
21. P. Ceruti, R. Morbio, M. Marraffa, G. Marchini Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties Am J Ophthalmol 145 2 2008 215 221
22. Z. Ozbek, E.J. Cohen, K.M. Hammersmith, C.J. Rapuano Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas Cornea 25 80 2006 890 894 (Pubitemid 44763846)
23. M. Edwards, G.M. Clover, N. Brookes, D. Pendergrast, J. Chaulk, C.N. McGhee Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 19911999 Cornea 21 2 2002 152 155 (Pubitemid 34188780)
24. C.M. Kirkness, L.A. Ficker, A.D. Steele, N.S. Rice The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus Eye 4 5 1990 673 688
25. V.J. Rao, L. Gnanaraj, K.W. Mitchell, F.C. Figueiredo Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes Cornea 20 8 2001 834 838 (Pubitemid 33029481)
26. I.D. Fabian, I.S. Barequet, A. Skaat Intraocular pressure measurements and biomechanical properties of the cornea in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty Am J Ophthalmol 151 5 2011 774 781
27. C. Kaufmann, L.M. Bachmann, M.A. Thiel Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 9 2004 3118 3121 (Pubitemid 39121844)
28. A.C. Browning, A. Bhan, A.P. Rotchford, S. Shah, H.S. Dua The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology Br J Ophthalmol 88 11 2004 1395 1399 (Pubitemid 39424717)
29. A. Meyenberg, M.E. Iliev, R. Eschmann, B.E. Frueh Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes Cornea 27 3 2008 305 310 (Pubitemid 351440864)
30. A.R. Ismail, M. Lamont, S. Perera Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties Br J Ophthalmol 91 7 2007 980 981 (Pubitemid 47013120)
31. B.A. Francis, A. Hsieh, M.Y. Lai Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry Ophthalmology 114 1 2007 20 26 (Pubitemid 46014299)
32. S. Feizi, A. Hashemloo, A. Rastegarpour Comparison of the Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52 8 2011 5887 5891
33. J.Y. Ku, H.V. Danesh-Meyer, J.P. Craig, G.D. Gamble, C.N. McGhee Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry Eye 20 2 2006 191 198
34. R.E. Frenkel, Y.J. Hong, D.H. Shin Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer Arch Ophthalmol 106 6 1988 750 753
35. S.F. Kao, P.R. Lichter, T.J. Bergstrom, S. Rowe, D.C. Musch Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer Ophthalmology 94 12 1987 1541 1544 (Pubitemid 18006879)
36. G. Shemesh, M. Waisbourd, D. Varssano, A. Michaeli, M. Lazar, S. Kurtz Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparative study Cornea 28 7 2009 724 727
37. O. Geyer, Y. Mayron, A. Loewenstein, M. Neudorfer, L. Rothkoff, M. Lazar Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes Br J Ophthalmol 76 9 1992 538 540
38. M.R. Jafarinasab, S. Feizi, M.A. Javadi, A. Hashemloo Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty Curr Eye Res 36 5 2011 417 421