Calculating kinetics and pathways of protein-ligand association

European Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 357-364

  Held, Martin ^a   Noé, Frank ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Model simulation; Probability distribution; Protein ligand association

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PHOSPHATE BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

BINDING AFFINITY; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LIGAND ASSOCIATION; SHORT SURVEY; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84857364039     PISSN: 01719335     EISSN: 16181298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.08.004     Document Type: Short Survey

References (75)

1. Ahmad M., Gu W., Helms V. Mechanism of fast peptide recognition by sh3 domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47:7626-7630.
2. Altobelli G., Subramaniam S. Kinetics of association of anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibody d44.1 and hen-egg lysozyme. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:2954-2965.
3. Bolhuis P.G., Chandler D., Dellago C., Geissler P.L. Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2002, 53:291-318.
4. Bowman G.R., Beauchamp K.A., Boxer G., Pande V.S. Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131:124101+.
5. Brune M., Hunter J.L., Howell S.A., Martin S.R., Hazlett T.L., Corrie J.E.T., Webb M.R. Mechanism of inorganic phosphate interaction with phosphate binding protein from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1998, 37:10370-10380.
6. Buch I., Giorgino T., Fabritiis G.D. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10184-10189.
7. Buchete N.V., Hummer G. Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112:6057-6069.
8. Chodera J.D., Dill K.A., Singhal N., Pande V.S., Swope W.C., Pitera J.W. Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:155101.
9. Chodera J.D., Noé F. Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models. ii. Uncertainties in observables and their time-evolution. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133:105102.
10. Dell'Orco D. Fast predictions of thermodynamics and kinetics of protein-protein recognition from structures: from molecular design to systems biology. Mol. Biosyst. 2009, 5:323-334.
11. Dill K.A. Polymer principles and protein folding. Protein Sci. 1999, 8:1166-1180.
12. Du R., Pande V.S., Yu A., Tanaka T., Shakhnovich E.S. On the transition coordinate for protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108:334-350.
13. Ehrlich L., Münkel C., Chirico G., Langowski J. A Brownian dynamics model for the chromatin fiber. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997, 13:271-279.
14. Elcock A.H. Atomic-level observation of macromolecular crowding effects: escape of a protein from the groel cage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:2340-2344.
15. Elcock A.H., Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C., McCammon J.A. Computer simulation of protein-protein association kinetics: acetylcholinesterase-fasciculin. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291:149-162.
16. Erban R., Chapman S.J. Stochastic modelling of reaction-diffusion processes: algorithms for bimolecular reactions. Phys. Biol. 2009, 6:046001.
17. Ermak D., McCammon J. Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69:1352-1360.
18. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. Effective charges for macromolecules in solvent. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100:3868-3878.
19. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar. Biophys. J. 1997, 72:1917-1929.
20. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. On the protein-protein diffusional encounter complex. J. Mol. Recognit. 1999, 12:226-234.
21. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. Protein-protein association: investigation of factors influencing association rates by Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 306:1139-1155.
22. Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. Biomolecular diffusional association. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12:204-213.
23. Geyer T., Winter U. An o(n2) approximation for hydrodynamic interactions in Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130:114905.
24. de Groot B., Daura X., Mark A., Grubmüller H. Essential dynamics of reversible peptide folding: memory-free conformational dynamics governed by internal hydrogen bonds. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 301:299-313.
25. Haddadian E.J., Gross E.L. A Brownian dynamics study of the interactions of the luminal domains of the cytochrome b6f complex with plastocyanin and cytochrome c6: the effects of the rieske fes protein on the interactions. Biophys. J. 2006, 91:2589-2600.
26. Held M., Metzner P., Prinz J.H., Noé F. Mechanisms of protein-ligand association and its modulation by protein mutations. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:701-710.
27. Hinrichs N.S., Pande V.S. Calculation of the distribution of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:244101.
28. Huang H.C., Briggs J.M. The association between a negatively charged ligand and the electronegative binding pocket of its receptor. Biopolymers 2002, 63:247-260.
29. Hubner I.A., Deeds E.J., Shakhnovich E.I. Understanding ensemble protein folding at atomic detail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:17747-17752.
30. Karpen M.E., Tobias D.J., Brooks C.L. Statistical clustering techniques for the analysis of long molecular dynamics trajectories: analysis of 2.2-ns trajectories of YPGDV. Biochemistry 1993, 32:412-420.
31. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 1959, 14:1-63.
32. Keller, B., Prinz, J.H., Noé, F. Markov models and dynamical fingerprints: unraveling the complexity of molecular kinetics. Chem. Phys., in press.
33. Lange O.F., Lakomek N.A., Fares C., Schroder G.F., Walter K.F.A., Becker S., Meiler J., Grubmuller H., Griesinger C., de Groot B.L. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an rdc-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 2008, 320:1471-1475.
34. Latorre J., Metzner P., Hartmann C., Schütte C. A structure-preserving numerical discretization of reversible diffusions. Comm. Math. Sci. 2011, 9:1051-1072.
35. Ledvina P.S., Tsai A.L., Wang Z., Koehl E., Quiocho F.A. Dominant role of local dipolar interactions in phosphate binding to a receptor cleft with an electronegative charge surface: equilibrium, kinetic, and crystallographic studies. Protein Sci. 1998, 7:2550-2559.
36. McGuffee S., Elcock A. Diffusion, crowding & protein stability in a dynamic molecular model of the bacterial cytoplasm. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000694.
37. Meltzer R.H., Thompson E., Soman K.V., Song X.Z., Ebalunode J.O., Wensel T.G., Briggs J.M., Pedersen S.E. Electrostatic steering at acetylcholine binding sites. Biophys. J. 2006, 91:1302-1314.
38. Metzner P., Schütte C., vanden Eijnden E. Transition path theory for Markov jump processes. Multiscale Model. Simul. 2009, 7:1192-1219.
39. Muff S., Caflisch A. Kinetic analysis of molecular dynamics simulations reveals changes in the denatured state and switch of folding pathways upon single-point mutation of a sheet miniprotein. Proteins 2007, 70:1185-1195.
40. Noé F. Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128:244103.
41. Noé F., Fischer S. Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational transitions in macromolecules. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2008, 18:154-162.
42. Noé F., Horenko I., Schütte C., Smith J.C. Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:155102.
43. Noé F., Schütte C., Vanden-Eijnden E., Reich L., Weikl T.R. Constructing the full ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19011-19016.
44. Northrup S.H., Allison S.A., McCammon J.A. Brownian dynamics simulation of diffusion-influenced bimolecular reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80:1517-1524.
45. Northrup S.H., Erickson H.P. Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89:3338-3342.
46. Onuchic J.N., Wolynes P.G. Theory of protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2004, 14:70-75.
47. Pachov G.V., Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C. On the structure and dynamics of the complex of the nucleosome and the linker histone. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:5255-5263.
48. Pan A.C., Roux B. Building Markov state models along pathways to determine free energies and rates of transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129:064107+.
49. Papoian G.A., Wolynes P.G. The physics and bioinformatics of binding and folding-an energy landscape perspective. Biopolymers 2003, 68:333-349.
50. Pauling L., Pressman D., Campbell D.H. An experimental test of the framework theory of antigen-antibody precipitation. Science 1943, 98:263-264.
51. Prinz, J.H., Keller, B., Noé, F., in press. Probing molecular kinetics with Markov models: metastable states, transition pathways and spectroscopic observables. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., [E-pub ahead of print]. doi:10.1039/C1CP21258C.
52. Prinz J.H., Wu H., Sarich M., Keller B., Senne M., Held M., Chodera J.D., Schütte C., Noé F. Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134:174105.
53. Radic Z. Electrostatic influence on the kinetics of ligand binding to acetylcholinesterase. distinctions between active center ligands and fasciculin. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:23265-23277.
54. Rao F., Caflisch A. The protein folding network. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 342:299-306.
55. Ripoll D.R., Faerman C.H., Axelsen P.H., Silman I., Sussman J.L. An electrostatic mechanism for substrate guidance down the aromatic gorge of acetylcholinesterase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90:5128-5132.
56. Schluttig J., Alamanova D., Helms V., Schwarz U.S. Dynamics of protein-protein encounter: a Langevin equation approach with reaction patches. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129:155106.
57. Schreiber G., Haran G., Zhou H.X. Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109:839-860.
58. Schultheis V., Hirschberger T., Carstens H., Tavan P. Extracting Markov models of peptide conformational dynamics from simulation data. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2005, 1:515-526.
59. Schütte C., Fischer A., Huisinga W., Deuflhard P. A direct approach to conformational dynamics based on hybrid Monte Carlo. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151:146-168.
60. Singhal N., Pande V.S. Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123:204909.
61. Singhal N., Snow C., Pande V.S. Path sampling to build better roadmaps: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a Trp Zipper beta hairpin. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121:415-425.
62. Song Y., Zhang Y., Shen T., Bajaj C.L., McCammon A.A., Baker N.A. Finite element solution of the steady-state Smoluchowski equation for rate constant calculations. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:2017-2029.
63. Spaar A., Dammer C., Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C., Helms V. Diffusional encounter of barnase and barstar. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:1913-1924.
64. Spaar A., Flock D., Helms V. Association of cytochrome c with membrane-bound cytochrome c oxidase proceeds parallel to the membrane rather than in bulk solution. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:1721-1732.
65. Stroppolo M., Falconi M., Caccuri A., Desideri A. Superefficient enzymes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58:1451-1460.
66. Swope W.C., Pitera J.W., Suits F., Pitman M., Eleftheriou M. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 2. Example applications to alanine dipeptide and beta-hairpin peptide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108:6582-6594.
67. Thirumalai D., Woodson S.A. Kinetics of folding of proteins and RNA. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29:433-439.
68. Tummino P.J., Copeland R.A. Residence time of receptor-ligand complexes and its effect on biological function. Biochemistry 2008, 47:5481-5492.
69. Vanden-Eijnden, E., 2006. Transition path theory. In: Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter Systems: From Materials to Chemical Biology, vol. 1, pp. 453-493.
70. Vijayakumar M., Wong K.Y., Schreiber G., Fersht A.R., Szabo A., Zhou H.X. Electrostatic enhancement of diffusion-controlled protein-protein association: comparison of theory and experiment on barnase and barstar. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 278:1015-1024.
71. Voelz V.A., Bowman G.R., Beauchamp K., Pande V.S. Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:1526-1528.
72. Wales D.J. Energy Landscapes 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
73. Weber, M., 2003. Improved Perron cluster analysis. ZIB Report 03-04.
74. Zhou H.X. On the calculation of diffusive reaction rates using Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92:3092.
75. Zhou H.X. Brownian dynamics study of the influences of electrostatic interaction and diffusion on protein-protein association kinetics. Biophys. J. 1993, 64:1711-1726.