MRI navigated stereotactic prostate biopsy. Fusion of MRI and real-time transrectal ultrasound images for perineal prostate biopsies;MRT-navigierte stereotaktische prostatabiopsie: Echtzeitfusion von MRT und transrektalem ultraschall zu perinealen prostatastanzbiopsien

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 50-56

  Kuru, T H ^a   Tulea, C ^a   Simpfendorfer T ^a   Popeneciu, V ^a   Roethke, M ^b   Hadaschik, B A ^a   Hohenfellner, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Three dimensional imaging; TRUS

Indexed keywords

ENEMA; QUINOLONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN SIZE; PERINEUM; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; URINE RETENTION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERINEUM; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84857361658     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: 14330563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2707-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abdollah F, Novara G, Briganti A et al (2010) Transrectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 77(4):921-925, doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.1008. 1048
2. Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M P, Nagele U et al (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50:738-748
3. Barzell WE, Melamed MR (2007) Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate - a 4-year experience. Urology 70:27-35
4. Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ferlay J et al (2010) Prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends in 37 European countries: an overview. Eur J Cancer 46:3040-3052
5. Campos-Fernandes JL, Bastien L, Nicolaiew N et al (2009) Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol 55:600-606
6. Chun FK, Epstein JI, Ficarra V et al (2010) Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 58:851-864
7. De La Rosette J J M C H, Wink MH, Mamoulakis C et al (2009) Optimizing prostate cancer detection: 8 versus 12-core biopsy protocol. J Urol 182:1329-1336
8. Eggener S, Salomon G, Scardino PT et al (2010) Focal therapy for prostate cancer: possibilities and limitations. Eur Urol 58:57-64
9. Emiliozzi P, Longhi S, Scarpone P et al (2001) The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol 166:845-850 (Pubitemid 32750962)
10. Engelhard K, Hollenbach H P, Kiefer B et al (2006) Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 16:1237-1243 (Pubitemid 43834709)
11. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 183:520-528
12. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61-71
13. Loch T (2004) Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urologe A 43:1377-1384 (Pubitemid 40125657)
14. Miyagawa T, Ishikawa S, Kimura T et al (2010) Realtime virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol 17:855-860
15. Onik G, Barzell W (2008) Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy. Urol Oncol 26:506-510
16. Onik G, Miessau M, Bostwick DG (2009) Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management. J Clin Oncol 27:4321-4326
17. Pondman KM, Fütterer JJ, Ten Haken B et al (2008) MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review. Eur Urol 54:517-527
18. Roehrborn CG, Andriole GL, Wilson TH et al (2011) Effect of dutasteride on prostate biopsy rates and the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and enlarged prostates in the combination of avodart and tamsulosin trial. Eur Urol 59:244-249
19. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R et al (2007) Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 52:1309-1322 (Pubitemid 47446019)
20. Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S et al (2008) Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusionguided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 101:841-845 (Pubitemid 351347719)
21. Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P et al (2011) Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol, doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112
22. Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H et al (2010) Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3T for detection - histopathologic correlation. Radiology 255:89-99
23. Turkbey B, Xu S, Kruecker J et al (2011) Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion. BJU Int 107:53-57
24. Ukimura O, Hirahara N, Fujihara A et al (2010) Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 17:890-893
25. Ukimura O, Hung AJ, Gill IS (2011) Innovations in prostate biopsy strategies for active surveillance and focal therapy. Curr Opin Urol 21:115-120
26. Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B et al (2008) Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg 13:255-264
27. Yakar D, Hambrock T, Huisman H et al (2010) Feasibility of 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy. Invest Radiol 45:121-125