Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer;Computergestützter transrektaler ultraschall (C-TRUS) in der diagnostik des prostatakarzinoms

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1377-1384

  Loch, T ^a  

^a Klin F Urologie D   (Germany)

Author keywords

C TRUS; Computer analysis; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 12344309887     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-004-0710-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertson PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273: 548-552
2. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C et al. (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143: 1146-1154
3. Oesterling JE (1991) Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumormarker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 145: 907-923
4. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E (1987) Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New Engl J Med 317: 909-916
5. Noldus J, Stamey TA (1996) Histological characteristics of radical prostatectomy specimens in men with a serum prostate specific antigen of 4 ng/ml or less. J Urol 155: 441-443
6. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142: 71-75
7. Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP et al. (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 152: 1506-1509
8. Nava L, Montorsi F, Consonni P, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Rigatti PJ (1997) Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE, and normal prostatic ultrasound. Urol 157: 59, abstract 226
9. Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Gillespie B, Oesterling JE (1997) Patient age and prostate gland size determine the appropriate number of cores per prostate biopsy. J Urol 157: 365, abstract 1428
10. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol 168: 2108-2110
11. Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases. Urology 60: 93-97
12. Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 5: 226-230
13. Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C et al. (1999) Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39: 198-204
14. Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C et al. (2000) Weiterentwicklung des Transrektalen Ultraschalls: Artifizielle Neuronale Netzwerk-Analyse (ANNA) in der Erkennung und Stadieneinteilung des Prostatakarzinoms. Urologe A 39: 341-347
15. Loch T, Gettys T, Cochran JS, Fulgham PF, Bertermann H (1990) Computer-aided image-analysis in transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. World J Urol 8: 150-153
16. Loch T, Lehmann J, Wullich B et al. (2004) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: Detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. J Urol: 171 (4): 477 A
17. Gleason DF (1977) Histologic grading and staging of prostate carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic pathology: The prostate. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 171-187
18. Carter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (1989) Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 142: 1008-1010
19. Shinohara K, Scardino PT, Carter SC (1989) Pathologic basis of the sonographic appearance of the normal and malignant prostate. Urol Clin Am 16: 675-678
20. Lee F, Gray JM, McLeary RD et al. (1985) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and staging. Prostate 7: 117-129
21. Ellis WJ, Brawer MK (1994) The significance of isoechoic prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 152: 2304-2307
22. Mettlin C, Murphy GP, Babaian RJ et al. (1996) The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer 77: 150-159
23. Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40: 475-483
24. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C et al. (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143: 1146-1154
25. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW (1993) Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. JAMA 270: 948-954
26. Chodak GW, Schoenberg HW (1984) Early detection of prostate cancer by routine screening, JAMA 252: 3661-3664
27. Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM (2004) Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy. J Urol 171: 1089-1092