Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: An essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 506-510

  Onik, Gary ^a   Barzell, Winston ^a  

^a Center for Surgical Advancement   (United States)

Author keywords

Focal therapy; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INDWELLING CATHETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME;

BIOPSY; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PERINEUM; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;

EID: 50649088395     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.03.005     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Messing E.M., and Thompson I. Follow-up of conservatively managed prostate cancer: watchful waiting and primary hormonal therapy. Urol Clin North Am 30 4 (2003) 687-702
2. Onik G., Narayan P., Vaughan D., et al. Focal nerve sparing cryoablation for the treatment of primary prostate cancer: A new approach to preserving potency. Urology 60 1 (2002) 109-114
3. Choy J.Y., Kim S.H., and Lee S.E. Peripheral hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: Evaluation with color and power Doppler ultrasound. Eur Urol 37 4 (2000) 443-448
4. Dhingsa R., Qayyum A., Coakley F.V., et al. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: Effect of clinical data on reader accuracy. Radiology 230 1 (2004) 215-222
5. Sved P.D., Gomez P., and Manoharan M. Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: Implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer. J Urol 172 1 (2004) 98-102
6. Crawford E.D., Wilson S.S., Torkko K.C., et al. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: A computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 96 7 (2005) 999-1004
7. Barzell W.E., and Whitmore W.F. Transperineal template guided saturation biopsy of the prostate: Rationale, indications, and technique. Urology Times 31 5 (2003) 41-42
8. Rukstalis D.B., Goldknopf J.L., Crowley E.M., et al. Prostate cryoablation: A scientific rationale for future modifications. Urology 60 2A (2002) 19-25
9. Noguchi M., Stamey T.A., McNeal J.E., et al. Prognostic factors for multifocal prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: Lack of significance of secondary cancers. J Urol 170 2 Pt 1 (2003) 459-463
10. Mian B.M., Lehr D.J., and Moore C.K. Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores. Urology 67 2 (2006) 379-383
11. Satoh T., Matsumoto K., Fujita T., et al. Cancer core distribution in patients diagnosed by extended transperineal prostate biopsy. Urology 66 1 (2005) 114-118
12. Pinkstaff D.M., Igel T.C., Petrou S.P., et al. Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate: Three year experience. Urology 65 4 (2005) 735-739
13. Chuu F.K., Steuber T., Erbersdobler A., et al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 49 5 (2006) 820-826
14. King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: Implications for radiotherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):386-91.