Cross-modal face identity aftereffects and their relation to priming

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 876-891

  Hills, Peter J ^a   Elward, Rachael L ^b   Lewis, Michael B ^b  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cross modal adaptation; Face identity aftereffect; Face recognition

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ART; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; LEARNING; NOMENCLATURE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION; VOICE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CARICATURES AS TOPIC; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; NAMES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RHYTIDOPLASTY; SEMANTICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

EID: 77955792693     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018731     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Amedi A., Malach R., Pascual-Leone A. Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception. Neuron 2005, 5:859-872.
2. Anderson N.D., Wilson H.R. The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research 2005, 45:1815-1828.
3. Beale J.M., Keil F.C. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 1995, 57:217-239.
4. Benson P.J., Perrett D.I. Synthesising continuous-tone caricatures. Image and Visual Computing 1991, 9:123-129.
5. Benson P.J., Perrett D.I. Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1991, 3:105-135.
6. Brennan S.E. The caricature generator. Leonardo 1985, 18:170-178.
7. Bruce V. Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1982, 73:105-116.
8. Bruce V. Recognising faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 1983, B302:423-436.
9. Bruce V., Valentine T. Semantic priming of familiar faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1986, 38A:125-150.
10. Bruce V., Young A.W. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986, 77:305-327.
11. Burton A.M., Bruce V. Naming faces and naming names: Exploring an interactive activation model of person recognition. Memory 1993, 1:457-480.
12. Burton A.M., Bruce V., Hancock P.J.B. From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science 1999, 23:1-31.
13. Burton A.M., Bruce V., Johnston R.A. Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology 1990, 81:361-380.
14. Burton A.M., Jenkins R., Hancock P.J.B., White D. Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 51:256-284.
15. Burton A.M., Kelly S.W., Bruce V. Cross-domain repetition priming in person recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1998, 51A:515-529.
16. Bywaters M., Andrade A., Turpin G. Determinants of the vividness of visual imagery: The effects of delayed recall, stimulus affect and individual differences. Memory 2004, 12:479-488.
17. Carbon C., Leder H. Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes?. Advances in Experimental Psychology 2005, 1:1-7.
18. Carson D.R., Burton A.M. Semantic priming of person recognition: Categorical priming may be a weaker form of the associative priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54A:1155-1179.
19. Cui X., Jeter C.B., Yang D., Montague P.R., Eagleman D.M. Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Research 2007, 47:474-478.
20. Eger E., Schweinberger S.R., Dolan R.J., Henson R.N. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: FMRI evidence. NeuroImage 2005, 26:1128-1139.
21. Ellis A.W., Young A.W., Flude B.M., Hay D.C. Repetition priming of face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1987, 39A:193-210.
22. Ellis H.D., Ellis D.M., Hosie J.A. Priming effects in children's' face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1993, 84:101-110.
23. Ellis H.D., Jones D.M., Mosdell N. Intra- and inter-modal repetition priming of familiar faces and voices. British Journal of Psychology 1997, 88:143-156.
24. Farah M.J., O'Reilly R.C., Vecera S.P. Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural-network. Psychological Review 1993, 100:571-588.
25. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
26. Gabrieli J.D.E. Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49:87-115.
27. Ganis G., Thompson W.L., Kosslyn S.M. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 2:226-241.
28. Goldman M., Hagen M. The forms of caricature: Physiognomy and political bias. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1978, 5:30-36.
29. Graf P., Squire L.R., Mandler G. The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1984, 10:164-178.
30. Grossberg S. A theory of visual coding, memory and development. Formal theories of visual perception 1978, Wiley, New York. E.L.J. Leeuwenberg, H.R.J.M. Buffart (Eds.).
31. Hancock P.J.B., Burton A.M., Bruce V. Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory and Cognition 1996, 24:26-40.
32. Harvey L.O. Visual memory: What is remembered?. Human memory and cognitive capabilities 1986, Elsevier, The Hague. F. Klix, H. Hagendorf (Eds.).
33. Hasnain N., Husain M.G. Is creative imagination equivalent to visual and auditory imaginations?. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education 1980, 6:49-52.
34. Hills P.J., Elward R.L., Lewis M.B. Identity adaptation is mediated and moderated by visualisation abilities. Perception 2009, 37:1241-1257.
35. Hills P.J., Lewis M.B., Honey R.C. Stereotype priming in face recognition: Interactions between semantic and visual information in face encoding. Cognition 2008, 108:185-200.
36. Hulbert A. Trading faces. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:3-5.
37. Ishai A., Schmidt C.F., Boesiger P. Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network. Brain Research Bulletin 2005, 67:87-93.
38. Issac A.R., Marks D.F. Individual differences in mental imagery experience: Developmental changes and specialization. British Journal of Psychology 1994, 85:479-500.
39. Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981, 110:306-340.
40. Jeffrey L., Rhodes G., Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 2006, 17:501-505.
41. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A. Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science 2006, 17:493-500.
42. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A. The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research 2007, 47:525-531.
43. Johnston R.A., Barry C. Repetition priming of access to biographical information from faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:326-339.
44. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:4302-4311.
45. Kosslyn S.M., Alpert N.M., Thompson W.L., Chabris C.F., Rauch S.K., Anderson A.K. Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain 1994, 117:1055-1071.
46. Kosslyn S.M., Alpert N.M., Thompson W.L., Malikovic V., Weise S.B., Chabris C.F., Hamilton S.E., et al. Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:263-287.
47. Kreiman G., Koch D., Fried I. Imagery neurons in the human brain. Nature 2000, 408:357-361.
48. Kung C.C. Expanding the FFA debate: A reevaluation of recent studies and evidence for the multimodal and dynamic fusiform gyrus. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2007, 67:4733.
49. Lee K., Byatt G., Rhodes G. Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: Testing the face-space framework. Psychological Science 2000, 11:379-385.
50. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
51. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Müller K., Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2005, 272:897-904.
52. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:467-477.
53. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1386-1390.
54. Marks D.F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology 1973, 64:17-24.
55. Marois R., Yi D.J., Chun M.M. The neural fate of consciously perceived and missed events in the attentional blink. Neuron 2004, 41:465-472.
56. Mauro R., Kubovy M. Caricature and face recognition. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:433-440.
57. McClelland, J. L. (1981). Retrieving general and specific information from stored knowledge of specifics. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 170-172.
58. McKelvie S.J. The Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire as a predictor of facial recognition memory performance. British Journal of Psychology 1994, 93-104.
59. Megreya A.M., Burton A.M. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory and Cognition 2006, 34:865-876.
60. Menees S.M. The effect of spatial frequency adaptation on the latency of spatial contrast detection. Vision Research 1998, 38:3933-3942.
61. Meyer D.E., Schvanevedlt R.W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words. Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 90:227-234.
62. Moradi D., Koch C., Shimojo S. Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 2005, 45:169-175.
63. Moutoussis K., Zeki S. The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2002, 99:9527-9532.
64. Nisbett R.E., Ross L. Human preferences: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
65. O'Craven K.M., Kanwisher N. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:1013-1023.
66. Pourtois G., Schwartz S., Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., Vullieumier P. Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1043-1057.
67. Rhodes G. When do caricatures look good. New Zealand Journal of Psychology 1993, 22:110-113.
68. Rhodes G. Superporttraits: Caricatures and recognition 1996, Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
69. Rhodes G., Brennan S.E., Carey S. Identification and rating of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:473-497.
70. Rhodes G., Byatt G., Tremewan T., Kennedy A. Facial distinctiveness and the power of caricatures. Perception 1997, 26:207-223.
71. Rhodes G., Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 2006, 46:2977-2987.
72. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566.
73. Richardson A. Individual differences in visual imagination imagery. Individual difference in conscious experience 2000, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. R.G. Kunzendorf, B. Wallace (Eds.).
74. Richardson A., McAndrew F. The effects of photic stimulation and private self-consciousness on the complexity of visual imagination imagery. British Journal of Psychology 1990, 81:381-394.
75. Robbins R., McKone E., Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:570-592.
76. Roediger H.L., McDermott K. Implicit memory in normal human subjects. Handbook of Neuropsychology 1993, Elsevier, New York. F. Boller, J. Grafman (Eds.).
77. Rotshtein P., Henson R.N.A., Treves A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 8:107-113.
78. Ryu J., Chaudhuri A. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects. Vision Research 2006, 46:4059-4063.
79. Sekuler R., Blake R. Perception 2001, McGraw-Hill, New York.
80. Slotnick S.D., Thompson W.L., Kosslyn S.M. Visual mental imagery induces retinotopically organized activation of early visual areas. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1570-1583.
81. Tulving E., Schacter D.L. Priming and human memory. Science 1990, 247:301-306.
82. Turk M., Pentland A. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:71-86.
83. Valentin D., Abdi H., Edelman B., O'Toole A.J. Principal component and neural network analysis of face images: What can be generalized in gender classification?. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1997, 41:398-413.
84. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race on face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991, 43A:161-204.
85. Valentine T., Chiroro P., Dixon R. An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a 'face space' model of face recognition. Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition 1995, Routeledge, London. T. Valentine (Ed.).
86. Webster M.A., MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:647-653.
87. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., Webster M.A. Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:420-437.
88. Young A.W., Flude B., Hellawell D.J., Ellis A.W. The nature of semantic priming effects in the recognition of familiar people. British Journal of Psychology 1994, 85:393-412.
89. Young A.W., Hellawell D., de Haan E.H.F. Cross-domain priming in normal subjects and a prosopagnoisc patient. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 40A:561-580.
90. Young A.W., McWeeny K.H., Ellis A.W., Hay D.C. Naming and categorizing faces and written names. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1986, 38A:297-381.
91. Zarrinpar A., Deldin P., Kosslyn S.M. Effects of depression on sensory/motor vs. central processing in visual mental imagery. Cognition & Emotion 2006, 20:737-758.
92. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion aftereffect. Vision Research 2001, 41:2979-2994.