An aftereffect of adaptation to mean size

Visual Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 211-231

  Corbett, Jennifer E ^a   Wurnitsch, Nicole ^b   Schwartz, Alex ^c   Whitney, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LINKEDIN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation aftereffect; Mean size; Summary representations

Indexed keywords

ADAPTING DOT SET; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH PASS FILTERED DISPLAY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MEAN SIZE; MULTIPLE DOT TEST DOT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84857321220     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.657261     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anstis, S. (1974). Size adaptation to visual texture and print: Evidence for spatial-frequency analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 87(1-2), 261-267.
2. Anstis, S., Verstraten, F., & Mather, G. (1998). The motion after-effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 111-117.
3. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
4. Arnold, D. H., Birt, A., & Wallis, T. S. A. (2008). Perceived size and spatial coding. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(23), 5954-5958.
5. Burr, D., & Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18(6), 425-428.
6. Campbell, F. W., & Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology, 197, 551-566.
7. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393-404.
8. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891-900.
9. Dakin, S., Greenwood, J., & Bex, P. (2010). Noise reveals what gets averaged in "size averaging". Journal of Vision, 10(7), 1357.
10. Durgin, F. H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 149-169.
11. Durgin, F. H. (2008). Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited. Current Biology, 18(18), R855-R856.
12. Durgin, F. H., & Huk, A. C. (1997). Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures. Vision Research, 37(23), 3273-3282.
13. Durgin, F. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1996). Visual learning in the perception of texture: Simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density. Spatial Vision, 9, 423-474.
14. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(5), 453-467.
15. Im, H. Y., & Chong, S. C. (2009). Computation of mean size is based on perceived size. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71(2), 375-384.
16. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
17. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476-490.
18. Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429-434.
19. Myczek, K., & Simons, D. J. (2008). Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 772-788.
20. Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411-422). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522.
22. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
23. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
24. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
25. Smirnakis, S. M., Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., Bialek, W., & Meister, M. (1997). Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature, 386, 69-73.
26. Solomon, J. A., Morgan, M., & Chubb, C. (2011). Efficiencies for the statistics of size discrimination. Journal of Vision, 11(12), 1-11.
27. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.