Perceived size and spatial coding

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 28, Issue 23, 2008, Pages 5954-5958

  Arnold, Derek H ^a   Birt, Annette ^a   Wallis, Thomas S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Perceived size; Perception; Retinotopy; Size distance invariance; Spatial coding; Tilt aftereffect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CODING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 44949237243     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 02706474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0578-08.2008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnold DH, Thompson M, Johnston A (2007) Motion and position coding. Vis Res 47:2403-2410.
2. Barlow HB, Foldiak P (1989) Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex. In: The computing neuron (Durbin R, Miall C, Mitchison GJ, eds), pp 54-72. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
3. Blakemore C, Carpenter RH, Georgeson MA (1970) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature 228:37-39.
4. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436.
5. Clifford CWG, Wenderoth P, Spehar B (2000) A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1705-1710.
6. Coltheart M (1971) Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psych Rev 78:114-121.
7. Daniel PM, Whitteridge D (1961) The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol (Lond) 159:203.
8. De Valois RL, De Valois KK (1991) Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vis Res 31:1619-1626.
9. Dobkins AC, Jeo RM, Fiser J, Allman JM (1998) Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex. Science 257:1279-1281.
10. Dragoi V, Sharma J, Miller EK, Sur M (2006) Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination. Nat Neurosci 5:883-891.
11. Emmert E (1881) Größenverhaltnisse der Nachbilder. Klin Mbl Augenheilk 19:443-450.
12. Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D, He S (2005) Orientation tuned FMRI adaptation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 94:4188-4195.
13. Fu Y, Shen Y, Hongfeng G, Dan Y (2004) Asymmetry in visual cortical circuits underlying motion-induced perceptual mislocalization. J Neurosci 24:2165-2171.
14. Gibson JJ, Radner M (1947) Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. J Exp Psychol 20:453-467.
15. Holway AH, Boring EG (1941) Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. Am J Psychol 54:21-37.
16. Joynson RB (1949) The problem of size and distance. Q J Exp Psychol 1:119-135.
17. Liu JV, Ashida H, Smith AT, Wandell BA (2006) Assessment of stimulus-induced changes in human V1 visual field maps. J Neurophysiol 96:3398-3408.
18. Liu T, Larsson J, Carrasco M (2007) Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron 55:313-323.
19. Morgan M (2003) The space between our ears. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
20. Murray SO, Boyaci H, Kersten D (2006) The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:429-434.
21. Nishida S, Motoyoshi I, Andersen RA, Shimojo S (2003) Gaze modulation of visual aftereffects. Vis Res 43:639-649.
22. Ono H (1966) Distal and approximate size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions. Am J Psychol 79:234-241.
23. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437-442.
24. Sereno MI, Dale Am Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RB (1995) Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268:889-893.
25. Smith III EL, Chino YM, Ridder III WH, Kitagawa K, Langston A (1990) Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Vis Neurosci 5:525-545.
26. Sterzer P, Rees G (2006) Perceived size matters. Nat Neurosci 9:303-304.
27. Taira M, Tsutsui KI, Jiang M, Yara K, Sakata H (2000) Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol 83:3140-3146.
28. Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M (2002) Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 298:409-412.
29. Viswanathan A, Freeman R (2007) Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity Nat Neurosci 10:1308-1312.
30. Whitney D, Goltz HC, Thomas CG, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex. Science 302:878-881.
31. Xu X, Ichida J, Shostak Y, Bonds AB, Casagrande VA (2002) Are primate lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells really sensitive to orientation or direction? Vis Neurosci 19:97-108.