Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 150-172

  Yildirim, Selda ^a  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

learning strategy use; motivational beliefs; multilevel analysis; perceived teacher support; PISA results

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857302744     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2011.596855     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahmed W., Minnaert A., van der Werf G., & Kuyper H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents' achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 39, 36-46.
2. Akyol G., Sungur S., & Tekkaya C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students' science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 1-21.
3. Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4. Baron R.M., & Kenny D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Berger J.-L., & Karabenick S.A. (2011). Motivation and students' use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416-428.
6. Bong M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students' course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553-570. (Pubitemid 33082688)
7. Brophy J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Chiu M.M., & Xhiua Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analysis of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18, 321-336.
9. Chiu M.M., Chow B.W.-Y., & McBride-Chang C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344-365.
10. Coleman J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
11. Dika S., & Singh K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31-60.
12. Eccles J.S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J.E. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665-691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13. Eccles J.S.,& Midgley,C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 13-44). New York, NY: Academic Press.
14. Eccles J.S., & Wigfield A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
15. Eccles J.S., & Wigfield A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
16. Eccles J.S., Wigfield A., & Schiefele U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1017-1095). New York, NY: Wiley.
17. Fraser B.J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
18. Fredricks J.A., Blumenfeld P., Friedel J., & Paris A. (2005). School engagement. In K.A. Moore & L.H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305-321). New York, NY: Springer.
19. Frenzel A.C., Pekrun R., & Goetz T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478-493.
20. Glorfeld L.W. (1995). An improvement on Horn's parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 55, 377-393.
21. Goh S.C., & Fraser B.J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 1, 199-229.
22. Greene B.A., Miller R.B., Crowson H.M.,Duke B.L.,& Akey,K.L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482. (Pubitemid 39202906)
23. Hardre P.L., & Sullivan D.W. (2008). Student differences and environment perceptions: How they contribute to student motivation in rural high schools. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 471-485.
24. Koutsoulis M.K., & Campbell J.R. (2001). Family processes affect students' motivation, and science and math achievement in Cypriot high schools. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 108-127.
25. Krull J.L., & Mackinnon D.P. (2001).Multilevel modelling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36, 249-277. (Pubitemid 33406102)
26. Lapointe J.M., Legault F., & Batiste S.J. (2005). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and adolescents' motivation in mathematics: A comparison of learning disabled, average, and talented students. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 39-54. (Pubitemid 43923571)
27. Lloyd J.E.V., Walsh J., & Yailagh M.S. (2005). Sex differences in performance attributions, self-efficacy, and achievement in mathematics: If I'm so smart, why don't I know it? Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 384-408. (Pubitemid 41825909)
28. Metallidou P., & Vlachou A. (2007). Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 2-15.
29. Mok M.M.C., Suen H., Liu F.Y.F., & So E.Y.P. (2005). Multilevel analysis of primary students' perception and deployment of self-learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 25, 129-148. (Pubitemid 40097492)
30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. Paris, France: Author.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: Author.
33. Pajares F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M.Maehr & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34. Patrick H., & Ryan A.M. (2005). Identifying adaptive classrooms: Dimensions of the classroom social environment. In K.A. Moore & L.H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 271-287). New York, NY: Springer.
35. Patrick H., Ryan A.M., & Kaplan A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98.
36. Pintrich P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470. (Pubitemid 41167991)
37. Pintrich P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Pintrich P.R., & De Groot E.V. (1990). Motivational and Self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
39. Raudenbush S.W., & Bryk A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Cheong Y.F., & Congdon R.T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
41. Roeser R.W., Midgley C., & Urdan T.C. (1996). Perceptions of the psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioural functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408-422.
42. Ryan A.M., & Patrick H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437-460.
43. Sirin S.R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453. (Pubitemid 41442067)
44. Sobel M.E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Taylor B.A., & Fraser B.J. (2003, April). The influence of classroom environment on high school students' mathematics anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
46. Thiessen, V., & Blasius J. (2008).Mathematics achievement andmathematics learning strategies: Cognitive competencies and construct differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 362-371.
47. Urdan T., & Schoenfelder E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349. (Pubitemid 44340707)
48. Walker C.O., Greene B.A., & Mansell R.A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1-12. (Pubitemid 43264561)
49. Wentzel K.R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.
50. Wigfield A., & Eccles J.S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
51. Wigfield A., Eccles J.S., Schiefele U., Roeser R.W.,& Davis-Kean P. (2006).Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3 Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 933-1002). Mahwah, NJ: Wiley.
52. Wolters C.A., & Pintrich P.R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
53. Wolters C.A., Pintrich P.R., & Karabenick S.A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K.A. Moore & L.H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251-270). New York, NY: Springer.
54. Young M.R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 25-40. (Pubitemid 40919851)
55. Zajacova A., Lynch S.M., & Espenshade T.J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46, 677-706. (Pubitemid 41203702)
56. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Zimmerman B.J., & Martinez-Pons M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.