Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1715, 2011, Pages 2165-2172

  Pischedda, Alison ^a   Stewart, Andrew D ^a   Little, Monica K ^a   Rice, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential allocation hypothesis; Drosophila melanogaster; Egg size; Fecundity; Maternal investment; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

EGG SIZE; FECUNDITY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MATERNAL EFFECT; REPRODUCTIVE COST; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MALE; OVUM; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 79959199077     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2272     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sheldon, B. C. 2000 Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 397-402. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01953-4
2. Harris, W. E. & Uller, T. 2009 Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1039-1048. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0299
3. Gowaty, P. A. 2008 Reproductive compensation. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1189-1200. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x
4. Fox, C. W., McLennan, L. A. & Mousseau, T. A. 1995 Male body size affects female lifetime reproductive success in a seed beetle. Anim. Behav. 50, 281-284. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0242
5. Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L.W., Hunt, J. & Tomkins, J. L. 2003 Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am. Nat. 161, 852-859. doi:10.1086/375173
6. Galeotti, P., Rubolini, D., Fea, G., Ghia, D., Nardi, P. A., Gherardi, F. & Fasola, M. 2006 Female freshwater crayfish adjust egg and clutch size in relation to multiple male traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1105-1110. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3345
7. Evans, J. P., Box, T. M., Brooshooft, P., Tatler, J. R. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. 2010 Females increase egg deposition in favor of large males in the rainbowfish, Melanotaenia australis. Behav. Ecol. 21, 465-469. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq006
8. Burley, N. 1988 The differential-allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132, 611-628. doi:10.1086/284877
9. De Lope, F. & Møller, A. P. 1993 Female reproductive effort depends on the degree of ornamentation of their mates. Evolution 47, 1152-1160. doi:10.2307/2409981
10. Petrie, M. & Williams, A. 1993 Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251, 127-131. doi:10.1098/rspb.1993.0018
11. Uller, T., Eklöf, J. & Andersson, S. 2005 Female egg investment in relation to male sexual traits and the potential for transgenerational effects in sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 584-590. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0886-2
12. Cunningham, E. J. A. & Russell, A. F. 2000 Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404, 74-77. doi:10.1038/35003565
13. Haig, D. & Westoby, M. 1989 Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. Am. Nat. 134, 147-155. doi:10.1086/284971
14. Moore, T. & Haig, D. 1991 Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 7, 45-49.
15. Haig, D. 1996 Placental hormones, genomic imprinting, and maternal-fetal communication. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 357-380. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9030357.x
16. Mochizuki, A., Takeda, Y. & Iwasa, Y. 1996 The evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 144, 1283-1295.
17. Wilkins, J. F. & Haig, D. 2003 What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 359-368. doi:10.1038/nrg1062
18. Bastock, M. & Manning, A. 1955 The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8, 85-111. doi:10.1163/156853955X00184
19. Friberg, U. 2006 Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness. Anim. Behav. 72, 1259-1268. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.021
20. Chapman, T. 2001 Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87, 511-521. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00961.x
21. Findlay, G. D., Yi, X., MacCoss, M. J. & Swanson, W. J. 2008 Proteomics reveals novel Drosophila seminal fluid proteins transferred at mating. PLoS Biol. 6, e178. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060178
22. Herndon, L. A. & Wolfner, M. F. 1995 A Drosophila seminal fluid protein, Acp26Aa, stimulates egg laying in females for 1 day after mating. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10114-10118. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.22.10114
23. Heifetz, Y., Lung, O., Frongillo Jr E. A. & Wolfner, M. F. 2000 The Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp26Aa stimulates release of oocytes by the ovary. Curr. Biol. 10, 99-102. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00288-8
24. Kubli, E. 2003 Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60, 1689-1704. doi:10.1007/s00018-003-3052
25. Peng, J., Chen, S., Büsser, S., Liu, H., Honegger, T. & Kubli, E. 2005 Gradual release of sperm bound sexpeptide controls female postmating behavior in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 15, 207-213. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.034
26. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244. doi:10.1038/373241a0
27. Fricke, C., Bretman, A. & Chapman, T. 2010 Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 157-165. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01882.x
28. Pitnick, S. 1991 Male size influences mate fecundity and remating interval in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 41, 735-745. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80340-9
29. Pitnick, S. & García-Gonzàlez, F. 2002 Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1821-1828. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2090
30. Clark, A. G., Aguade, M., Prout, T., Harshman, L. G. & Langley, C. H. 1995 Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139, 189-201.
31. Fiumera, A. C., Dumont, B. L. & Clark, A. G. 2005 Sperm competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster associated with variation in male reproductive proteins. Genetics 169, 243-257. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.032870
32. Friberg, U., Lew, T. A., Byrne, P. G. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution 59, 1540-1551.
33. Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1990 Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 419-425. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(90)90059-O
34. Schwarzkopf, L., Blows, M. W. & Caley, M. J. 1999 Life history consequences of divergent selection on egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 154, 333-340. doi:10.1086/303242
35. Greenberg, A. J., Hackett, S. R., Harshman, L. G. & Clark, A. G. 2010 A hierarchical Bayesian model for a novel sparse partial Diallel crossing design. Genetics 185, 361-373. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.115055
36. Rice, W. R., Linder, J. E., Friberg, U., Lew, T. A., Morrow, E. H. & Stewart, A. D. 2005 Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6527-6534. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501889102
37. Bloch Qazi, M. C., Heifetz, Y. & Wolfner, M. F. 2003 The developments between gametogenesis and fertilization: ovulation and female sperm storage in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 256, 195-211. doi:10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00125-2
38. Markow, T. A., Beall, S. & Matzkin, L. M. 2009 Egg size, embryonic development time and ovoviviparity in Drosophila species. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 430-434. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01649.x
39. Pitnick, S., Miller, G. T., Schneider, K. & Markow, T. A. 2003 Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1507-1512. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2382
40. Avelar, T. 1993 Egg size in Drosophila: standard unit of investment of variable response to environment? The effect of temperature. J. Insect Physiol. 39, 283-289. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(93)90058-Y
41. Azevedo, R. B. R., French, V. & Partridge, L. 1996 Thermal evolution of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50, 2338-2345. doi:10.2307/2410702
42. Azevedo, R. B. R., Partridge, L. & French, V. 1997 Lifehistory consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 150, 250-282. doi:10.1086/286065
43. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Clark, A. G., Begun, D. J. & Prout, T. 1999 Female male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283, 217-220. doi:10.1126/science.283.5399.217
45. Manier, M. K., Belote, J. M., Berben, K. S., Novikov, D., Stuart, W. T. & Pitnick, S. 2010 Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328, 354-357. doi:10.1126/science.1187096