Predicting Participation in Ultrasound Hip Screening From Message Framing

Health Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 186-193

  Witting, Marjon ^a   Boere Boonekamp, Magda M ^a   Fleuren, Margot A H ^b   Sakkers, Ralph J B ^c   IJzerman, Maarten J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857088308     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.571760     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abhyankar, P., O'Connor, D. B. and Lawton, R. 2008. The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 13: 1-16.
2. Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D. and Salovey, P. 2003. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22: 60-67.
3. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J. and Epel, E. 1995. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14: 178-184.
4. Clegg, J., Bache, C. E. and Raut, V. V. 1999. Financial justification for routine ultrasound screening of the neonatal hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 81: 852-857.
5. Cox, D. and Cox, A. D. 2001. Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65: 91-103.
6. Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E. and Rothman, A. J. 1999. Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18: 189-196.
7. Dorn, U. and Neumann, D. 2005. Ultrasound for screening developmental dysplasia of the hip: A European perspective. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 17: 30-33.
8. Fassaert, T., Hesselink, A. E. and Verhoeff, A. P. 2009. Acculturation and use of health care services by Turkish and Moroccan migrants: A cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health, 9
9. Ferguson, E. and Gallagher, L. 2007. Message framing with respect to decisions about vaccination: The roles of frame valence, frame method and perceived risk. British Journal of Psychology, 98: 667-680.
10. Frenken, F. (2005). Waardering voor activiteiten consultatiebureau [Statistics Netherlands Website]. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/vrije-tijd-cultuur/publicaties/ artikelen/archief/2005/2005-1734-wm.htm (http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/vrije-tijd-cultuur/publicaties/ artikelen/archief/2005/2005-1734-wm.htm)
11. Gerend, M. A. and Shepherd, J. E. 2007. Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26: 745-752.
12. Graf, R. 1980. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 97: 117-133.
13. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
14. Kessels, R. P. C. 2003. Patients' memory for medical information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96: 219-222.
15. Kokkedee, W. 1992. Kidney procurement policies in the Eurotransplant region. 'Opting in' versus 'opting out'. Social Science and Medicine, 35: 177-182.
16. Latimer, A. E., Rench, T. A., Rivers, S. E., Katulak, N. A., Materese, S. A., Cadmus, L. and Salovey, P. 2008. Promoting participation in physical activity using framed messages: An application of prospect theory. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13: 659-681.
17. McCaul, K. D. and Wold, K. S. 2002. The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. Journal of Community Health, 27: 181-190.
18. Meyerowitz, B. E. and Chaiken, S. 1987. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 500-510.
19. Mutch, L. and King, R. 1985. Obtaining parental consent-Opting in or opting out?. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 60: 979-980.
20. O'Connor, D. B., Ferguson, E. and O'Connor, R. C. 2005. Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: The role of message framing, attitudes and stress appraisals. British Journal of Psychology, 96: 351-369.
21. O'Keefe, D. J. and Jensen, J. D. 2007. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12: 623-644.
22. O'Keefe, D. J. and Jensen, J. D. 2009. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59: 296-316.
23. Rivers, S. E., Salovey, P., Pizarro, D. A., Pizarro, J. and Schneider, T. R. 2005. Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10: 65-77.
24. Roovers, E. A., Boere-Boonekamp, M. M., Castelein, R. M., Zielhuis, G. A. and Kerkhoff, T. H. 2005. Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Archives of Disease in Childhood, Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 90: F25-30.
25. Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B. and Salovey, P. 1999. The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1355-1369.
26. Rothman, A. J. and Salovey, P. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121: 3-19.
27. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K. and Martin, C. D. 1993. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29: 408-433.
28. Scheppers, E., Van Dongen, E., Dekker, J., Geertzen, J. and Dekker, J. 2006. Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: A review. Family Practice, 23: 325-348.
29. Segura, J. M., Castells, X., Casamitjana, M., Macià, F., Porta, M. and Katz, S. J. 2001. A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program. Preventive Medicine, 33: 325-332.
30. Stronks, K., Ravelli, A. C. J. and Reijneveld, S. A. 2001. Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55: 701-707.
31. Theis, J.-C. and Vane, A. 2003. The role of ultrasound in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 37: 215-222.
32. Treiber, M., Tomažic, T., Tekauc-Golob, A., Žolger, J., Korpar, B., Burja, S and Sikošek, A. 2008. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn: A population-based study in the Maribor region, 1997-2005. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 120: 31-36.
33. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453-458.
34. Verbrugge, H. P. 1990. Youth health care in the Netherlands: A bird's eye view. Pediatrics, 86: 1044-1047.
35. Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. and Reijneveld, S. A. 2007. Jeugdgezondheidszorg: Meer preventie voor weinig geld. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 85: 371-373.
36. Von Kries, R., Ihme, N., Oberle, D., Lorani, A., Stark, R., Altenhofen, L. and Niethard, F. U. 2003. Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany. Lancet, 362: 1883-1887.
37. Williams, T., Clarke, V. and Borland, R. 2001. Effects of message framing on breast-cancer-related beliefs and behaviors: The role of mediating factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31: 925-950.