Development predictive QSAR models for artemisinin analogues by various feature selection methods: A comparative study

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 1-15

  Abbasitabar, F ^a   Zare Shahabadi, V ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

ant colony optimization; artemisinin; descriptor selection; quantitative structure activity relationship; successive projection algorithm

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; ELECTRONEGATIVITY; FEATURE SELECTION; LINEAR REGRESSION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; MOLECULES;

ARTEMISININ; ARTEMISININ ANALOGS; DESCRIPTOR SELECTION; DESCRIPTORS; EQUALISATION; MATRIX; ORBITALS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP MODELING; SUCCESSIVE PROJECTIONS ALGORITHM;

ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84857068556     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2011.623316     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kaur, K, Jain, M, Kaur, T and Jain, R. 2009. Antimalarials from nature. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17: 3229-3256.
2. Kumar, V, Mahajan, A and Chibale, K. 2009. Synthetic medicinal chemistry of selected antimalarial natural products. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17: 2236-2275.
3. Klayman, DL. 1985. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): An antimalarial drug from China. Science, 228: 1049-1055.
4. Biot, C and Chibale, K. 2006. Novel approaches to antimalarial drug discovery. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets, 6: 173-204.
5. Kamchonwongpaisan, S and Meshnick, SR. 1996. The mode of action of the antimalarial artemisinin and its derivatives. Gen. Pharmacol., 27: 587-592.
6. Posner, GH, Cumming, JN, Ploypradith, P and Oh, CH. 1995. Evidence for Fe(IV):O in the molecular mechanism of action of the trioxane antimalarial artemisinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117: 5885-5886.
7. Posner, GH, Park, SB, Gonzalez, L, Wang, D, Cumming, JN, Klinedinst, D, Shapiro, TA and Bachi, MD. 1996. Evidence for the importance of high valent Fe=O and of a diketone in the molecular mechanism of action of antimalarial trioxane analogues of artemisinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118: 3537-3538.
8. Guha, R and Jurs, PC. 2004. Development of QSAR models to predict and interpret the biological activity of artemisinin analogues. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44: 1440-1449.
9. Srivastava, M, Singh, H and Naik, PK. 2009. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of artemisinin: The development of predictive in vivo antimalarial activity models. J. Chemom., 23: 618-635.
10. Avery, MA, McLean, G, Edwards, G and Ager, A. 2000. "Structure activity relationships of peroxide based artemisinin antimalarials". In Biologically Active Natural Products: Pharmaceuticals, Edited by: Cutler, SJ and Cutler, HG. 121-132. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
11. Woolfrey, JR, Avery, MA and Doweyko, AM. 1998. Comparison of 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: Analysis of the in vitro antimalarial activity of 154 artemisinin analogues by hypothetical active site lattice and comparative molecular field analysis. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 12: 165-181.
12. Avery, MA, Alvim-Gaston, M and Woolfrey, JR. 1999. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of peroxidic antimalarials based on artemisinin. Adv. Med. Chem., 4: 125-217.
13. Avery, MA, Alvim-Gaston, M, Rodrigues, CR, Barreiro, EJ, Cohen, FE, Sabnis, YA and Woolfrey, JR. 2002. Structure activity relationships of the antimalarial agent artemisinin. The development of predictive in vitro potency models using CoMFA and HQSAR methodologies. J. Med. Chem., 45: 292-303.
14. Tommuphean, S, Kokpol, S, Parasuk, V, Wolschann, P, Winger, RH, Liedl, KR and Rode, BM. 1998. Comparative molecular field analysis of artemisinin derivatives: Ab intio versus semiempirical optimized structures. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 12: 397-409.
15. Avery, MA, Gao, F, Wesley, CKM, Mehrotra, S and Milhous, WK. 1993. Structure-activity relationships of the antimalarial agent artemisinin.1. Synthesis and comparative molecular field analysis of C-9 analogues of artemisinin and 10-deoxoartemisinin. J. Med. Chem., 36: 4264-4275.
16. Cheng, F, Shen, J, Luo, X, Zhu, W, Gu, J, Ji, R, Jiang, H and Chen, K. 2002. Molecular docking and 3-D-QSAR studies on the possible antimalarial mechanism of artemisinin analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 10: 2883-2891.
17. Girones, X, Gallegos, A and Carbo-Dorca, R. 2000. Modeling antimalarial activity: Application of kinetic energy density quantum similarity measures as descriptors in QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40: 1400-1407.
18. Tonmunphean, S, Parasuk, V and Kokpol, S. 2000. QSAR study of antimalarial activities and artemisinin-heme binding properties obtained from docking calculations. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 19: 475-483.
19. Cramer, RD, Patterson, DE and Bunce, JD. 1988. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). I. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110: 5959-5967.
20. Cramer, RD, Patterson, DE, Bunce, JD and Frank, IE. 1988. Crossvalidation, bootstrapping and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant. Struct-Act. Relat. Pharmacol., Chem. Biol., 7: 18-25.
21. Shamsipur, M, Zare-Shahabadi, V, Hemmateenejad, B and Akhond, M. 2009. Combination of ant colony optimization with various local search strategies. A novel method for variable selection in multivariate calibration and QSPR study. QSAR Comb. Sci., 28: 1263-1275.
22. Niazi, A, Jameh-Bozorghi, S and Nori-Shargh, D. 2008. Prediction of toxicity of nitrobenzenes using ab initio and least squares support vector machines. J. Hazard. Mater., 151: 603-609.
23. Niazi, A, Jameh-Bozorghi, S and Nori-Shargh, D. 2007. Quantitative structure-property relationship study of the solubility of thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid derivatives using ab initio and genetic algorithm-partial least squares. Chin. Chem. Lett., 18: 621-624.
24. Shamsipur, M, Zare-Shahabadi, V, Hemmateenejad, B and Akhond, M. 2006. Ant colony optimisation: A powerful tool for wavelength selection. J. Chemom., 20: 146-157.
25. ChemDraw Ultra 6.0 and Chem3D Ultra, Cambridge Soft Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA
26. Akhlaghi, Y and Kompany-Zareh, M. 2006. Application of radial basis function networks and successive projections algorithm in a QSAR study of anti-HIV activity for a large group of HEPT derivatives. J. Chemom., 20: 1-12.
27. Martin, YC. 2010. Quantitative Drug Design: A Critical Introduction, 2nd, New York: CRC Press.
28. Kompany-Zareh, M. 2009. An improved QSPR study of the toxicity of aliphatic carboxylic acids using genetic algorithm. Med. Chem. Res., 18: 143-157.
29. Dorigo, M and Stutzle, T. 2004. Ant Colony Optimization, New York: MIT Press.
30. Zare-Shahabadi, V and Abbasitabar, F. 2010. Application of ant colony optimization in development of models for prediction of anti-HIV-1 activity of HEPT derivatives. J. Comput. Chem., 31: 2354-2362.
31. Shamsipur, M, Zare-Shahabadi, V, Hemmateenejad, B and Akhond, M. 2009. An efficient variable selection method based on the use of external memory in ant colony optimization. Application to QSAR/QSPR studies. Anal. Chim. Acta, 646: 39-46.
32. Topliss, JG and Edwards, RP. 1979. Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem., 22: 1238-1244.
33. Chatterjee, S, Hadi, A and Price, B. 2000. Regression Analysis by Examples, 3rd, New York: Wiley-VCH.
34. Burden, FR. 1989. Molecular identification number for substructure searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29: 225-227.
35. Stanton, DT. 1999. Evaluation and use of BCUT descriptors in QSAR and QSPR studies. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39: 11-20.
36. Todeschini, R and Consonni, V. 2000. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.