Effects of Intensive Reading Intervention for Eighth-Grade Students With Persistently Inadequate Response to Intervention

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 515-525

  Vaughn, Sharon ^a   Wexler, Jade ^a   Leroux, Audrey ^a   Roberts, Greg ^a   Denton, Carolyn ^b   Barth, Amy ^c   Fletcher, Jack ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

intensive reading; middle school; response to intervention; small group

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; DYSLEXIA; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; READING; TEACHING;

EID: 84857053014     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219411402692     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Al Otaiba S. D.Children who do not respond to early literacy intervention: A longitudinal study across kindergarten and first grade.Dissertation Abstracts International. 2000;61 (04):.
2. Al Otaiba S.,Fuchs D.Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature.Remedial and Special Education. 2002;23:300-316.
3. Berninger V. W.,Abbott R. D.,Vermeulen K.,Ogier S.,Brooksher R.,Zook D.,Lemos Z.Comparison of faster and slower responders to early intervention in reading: Differentiating features of their language profiles.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2002;25:59-76.
4. Biancarosa C.,Snow C. E.Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. 2004). Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2004:.
5. Center Y.,Freeman L.,Robertson G.The relative effect of a code-oriented and a meaning-oriented early literacy program on regular and low progress Australian students in year 1 classrooms which implement reading recovery.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2001;48:207-232.
6. Chen H.Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:.
7. Deshler D. D.,Hock M. F.Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need. Pressley M.Billman A. K.Perry K. H.Reffitt K. E.Reynolds J. M., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2007:98-128.
8. Edmonds M. S.,Vaughn S.,Wexler J.,Reutebuch C. K.,Cable A.,Tackett K. K.,Schnakenberg J. W.A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers.Review of Educational Research. 2009;79:262-300.
9. Elleman A. M.,Lindo E. J.,Morphy P.,Compton D. L.The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis.Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2009;2:1-44.
10. Fazio B. B.Learning a new poem: Memory for connected speech and phonological awareness in low-income children with and without specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research. 1997;40:1285-1297.
11. Fletcher J. M.,Vaughn S.Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic deficulties. 2009;3:30-37.
12. Foorman B. R.Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale. Baltimore, MD: York Press; 2003:.
13. Fuchs D.,Fuchs L. S.,Stecker P. M.The "blurring" of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services.Exceptional Children. 2010;76:301-323.
14. Fuchs L. S.,Fuchs D.Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress.School Psychology Review. 1992;21:45-58.
15. Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.,Rivkin S. G.Does special education raise academic achievement for students with disabilities?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1998:.
16. Hurford D. P.Training phonemic segmentation ability with a phonemic discrimination intervention in second- and third-grade children with reading disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1990;23:564-569.
17. Jenkins J. R.,Jewell M.Examining the validity two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze.Exceptional Children. 1993;59:421-432.
18. Juel C.,Minden-Cupp C.Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies.Reading Research Quarterly. 2000;35:458-492.
19. Kamil M.,Borman G.,Dole J.,Kral C.,Salinger T.,Torgesen J.Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2008:.
20. Kim J. S.,Samson J. F.,Fitzgerald R.,Hartry A.A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4-6: Effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2010;23:1109-1129.
21. Mastropieri M.,Scruggs T. E.,Graetz J. E.Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers.Learning Disabilities Quarterly. 2003;26:103-116.
22. Perfetti C. A.,Landi N.,Oakhill J.The science of reading: A handbook. Snowling M. J.Hulme C., ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2005:227-247.
23. ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM. S.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation. Center on Instruction. Available at http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/COI%20Struggling%20Readers.pdf.
24. Shinn J.,Deno S. L.,Espin C. A.Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth.Journal of Special Education. 2000;34:164-172.
25. ShinnM. R.ShinnM. M. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading maze for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/uploads/pdfs/scoring_maze.pdf.
26. Texas Education Agency. (2004). Appendix 10 - Technical digest 2004-2005. Retrieved January 8, 2000, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index3.aspx?id=4397&menu_id=793.
27. TorgesenJ. K.MyersD.SchirmA.StuartE.VartivarianS.MansfieldW.HaanC. (2006). National assessment of the Title I interim report to congress: Volume II: Closing the reading gap, first year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/title1interimreport/vol2.pdf.
28. Torgesen J. K.,Wagner R. K.,Rashotte C. A.The prevention and remediation of sever reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind.Scientific Studies of Reading. 1997;1:217-234.
29. Torgesen J. K.,Wagner R. K.,Rashotte C. A.Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999:.
30. Vadasy P. F.,Sanders E. A.,Peyton J. A.,Jenkins J. R.Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 2002;17:227-241.
31. Vaughn S.,Wexler J.,Roberts G.,Barth A. E.,Cirino P. T.,Romain M., Fletcher J. M.The effects of tertiary treatments on middle school students with reading disabilities: Individualized versus standardized approaches.Exceptional Children. in press;:.
32. Vaughn S.,Cirino P. T.,Wanzek J.,Wexler J.,Fletcher J. M.,Denton C. D., Francis D. J.Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention.School Psychology Review. 2010;39:3-21.
33. Vaughn S.,Fletcher J.Thoughts on rethinking response to intervention with secondary students.School Psychology Review. 2010;39:296-299.
34. Vaughn S.,Linan-Thompson S.,Hickman P.Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities.Exceptional Children. 2003;69:391-409.
35. Vellutino F. R.,Scanlon D. M.,Lyon G. R.Differen-tiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000;33:223-238.
36. Vellutino F. R.,Scanlon D. M.,Sipay E. R.,Small S. G.,Pratt A.,Chen R.,Denckla M. B.Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1996;88:601-638.
37. Wagner R. K.,Torgesen J. K.,Rashotte C. A.,Pearson N.The test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2010:.
38. WanzekJ. (2005). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
39. Wanzek J.,Vaughn S.Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions.School Psychology Review. 2007;36:541-561.
40. Wanzek J.,Vaughn S.Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 2009;24:151-163.
41. Wanzek J.,Vaughn S.,Roberts G.,Fletcher J. M.Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students identified with learning disabilities.Exceptional Children. in press;:.
42. Williams J. P.Commentary: Four meta-analyses and some general observations.Elementary School Journal. 2001;101:349-354.
43. Wilson B.Wilson reading system. Willbury, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation; 1996:.
44. Woodcock R. W.,McGrew K.,Mather N.Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 2001:.