Designing for the future: How the learning sciences can inform the trajectories of preservice teachers

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 147-160

  Jurow, A Susan ^a   Tracy, Rita ^a   Hotchkiss, Jacqueline S ^a   Kirshner, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

case study; elementary teacher education; field experiences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857011794     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487111428454     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Armaline W.D.,Hoover R.L.Field experience as a vehicle for transformation: Ideology, education, and reflective practice.Journal of Teacher Education. 1989;40 (3): 49-56.
2. Beach K.Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education.Review of Research in Education. 1999;24:101-139.
3. Bourdieu P.Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 2004:.
4. Bransford J.,Brown A.,Cocking R.How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999:.
5. Cole M.Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1996:.
6. Cole M.The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2006:.
7. Cornelius L.,Herrenkohl L.R.Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts.Cognition and Instruction. 2004;22:467-498.
8. Dreier O.Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 2008:.
9. Eccles J.,Gootman J.Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002:.
10. Engle R.A.Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2006;15:451-498.
11. Engle R.A.,Conant F.C.Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom.Cognition and Instruction. 2002;20:399-483.
12. Erickson F.Handbook of Research on Teaching. 1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York, NY: Macmillan.Wittrock M.C., ed. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1986:328-375.
13. Erickson F.Talk and social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 2004:.
14. Garcia Coll C.,Lamberty G.,Jenkins R.,McAdoo H.P.,Crnic K.,Wasik B.,Vasquez Garcia H.An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children.Child Development. 1996;67 (5): 1891-1914.
15. GeeJ. P. (2005). Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85(2), 33-37. Retrieved from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/Good_Learning.pdf.
16. González N.,Moll L.,Amanti C.Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:.
17. Greeno J.G.,Hall R.P.Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms.Phi Delta Kappan. 1997;78:361-367.
18. Gutiérrez K.D.,Baquedano-Lopez P.,Alvarez H.The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students. de la Ruz Reyes M.Halcon J.J., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College; 2001:122-141.
19. Gutiérrez K.D.,Stone L.A cultural-historical view of learning and learning disabilities: Participating in a community of learners.Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice. 1997;12 (2): 123-131.
20. Gutiérrez K.D.,Vossoughi S.Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments.Journal of Teacher Education. 2010;61 (1-2): 100-117.
21. Hand V.M.The co-construction of opposition in a low-tracked mathematics classroom.American Educational Research Journal. 2010;47 (1): 97-132.
22. Irby M.,Ferber T.,Pittman K.Youth Action: Youth contributing to communities, communities supporting youth. Takoma Park, MD: Forum for Youth Investment; 2001:.
23. Jurow A.S.,Creighton L.Improvisational science discourse: Teaching science in 2 K-1 classrooms.Linguistics and Education. 2005;16 (3): 253-362.
24. Jurow A.S.,Pierce D.Exploring the relations between "soul" and "role": Learning from the courage to lead.Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2011;18 (1): 26-42.
25. Kahne J.,Nagaoka J.,Brown A.,O'Brien J.,Quinn T.,Thiede K.Assessing after-school programs as contexts for youth development.Youth & Society. 2001;32 (4): 421-446.
26. Kirshner B.Guided participation in youth activism: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2008;17 (1): 60-101.
27. Larson R.W.Toward a psychology of positive youth development.American Psychologist. 2000;55 (1): 170-183.
28. Larson R.W.,Brown J.Emotional development in adolescence: What can be learned from a high school theater program?.Child Development. 2007;78 (4): 1083-1099.
29. Lave J.Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University; 1988:.
30. Lortie D.Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago; 1975:.
31. Mahoney J.,Harris A.L.,Eccles J.Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis.Social Policy Report. 2006;20 (4): 3-26.
32. McLaughlin M.Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network; 2000:.
33. Moll L.,Amanti C.,Neff D.,Gonzalez N.Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms.Theory Into Practice. 1992;31 (2): 132-141.
34. Nasir N.S.Everyday pedagogy: Lessons from basketball, track, and dominoes.Phi Delta Kappan. 2008;89 (7): 529-532.
35. Nasir N.S.,Rosebery A.S.,Warren B.,Lee C.D.The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Sawyer R.K., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006:491-504.
36. O'Connor K.,Penuel W.R.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Learning research as a human science. Penuel W.R.O'Connor K., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College; 2010:1-16.
37. Rogoff B.Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners.Mind Culture Society. 1994;1:209-229.
38. Rogoff B.The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
39. Rose M.The mind at work: Valuing the intelligence of the American worker. New York, NY: Penguin Books; 2004:.
40. Rosebery A.S.,Warren B.Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students' strengths. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press; 2008:.
41. Sawyer R.K.The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Sawyer R.K., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:567-580.
42. Stigler J.W.,Hiebert J.Teaching is a cultural activity.American Educator. 1998;22 (4): 1-10.
43. Thorne B.Gender play: Boys and girls in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers; 1993:.
44. Wang J.,Spalding E.,Odell S.J.,Klecka C.L.,Lin E.Bold ideas for improving teacher education and teaching: What we see, hear, and think.Journal of Teacher Education. 2010;61 (1-2): 3-15.
45. Wenger E.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University; 1998:.
46. Wertsch J.V.,Toma C.Constructivism in education. Steffe L.P.Gale J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995:159-174.
47. Wortham S.Interactionally situated cognition: A classroom example.Cognitive Science. 2001;25:37-66.