Interoperability between visual UML design applications and authoring tools for learning design

International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control

Volumn 8, Issue 1 B, 2012, Pages 845-865

  Barchino, Roberto ^a   Hilera, José R ^a   de Marcos, Luis ^a   Gutiérrez Salvador Otón, José M ^a   Gutiérrez, José A ^a   Martínez, José J ^a   Jiménez, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Learning design; UML; XML

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; ASSESSMENT CRITERIA; AUTHORING TOOL; LEARNING ACTIVITY; LEARNING DESIGNS; LEARNING PROCESS; MODELLING TOOLS; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; TEACHING METHODS; TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS; UML; UML DESIGN;

INTEROPERABILITY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; TEACHING; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; XML;

DESIGN;

EID: 84856950314     PISSN: 13494198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. IMS Learning Design Specification-IMS Global Learning Consortium, http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/, 2003.
2. E. Koper, Modeling Units of Study from a Pedagogical Perspective: The Pedagogical Meta-model behind EML, Open University of Netherlands, http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/articles, 2001.
3. M. Caeiro, M. Derntl and L. Botturi, Special issue on visual instructional design languages, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol.21, no.6, 2010.
4. J. M. Dodero, A. Martínez and J. Torres, An extensible approach to visually editing adaptive learning activities and designs based on services, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol.21, no.6, pp.332-346, 2010.
5. K. Figl, M. Derntl, M. Caeiro and L. Botturi, Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol.21, no.6, pp.359-373, 2010.
6. L. Botturi and S. Todd, Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, Idea Group (2007).
7. Unified Modeling Language (UML), Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/, 2009.
8. ISO/IEC 19505-1: Information Technology-OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) Version 2.1.2-Part 1: Infrastructure, International Standards Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 2009.
9. ISO/IEC 19505-2: Information Technology-OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) Version 2.1.2-Part 2: Superstructure, International Standards Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 2009.
10. N. Pukkhem and W. Vatanawood, An evidential reasoning approach for learning object recommendation with uncertainty, ICIC Express Letters, vol.4, no.3(B), pp.929-936, 2010.
11. XML Metadata Interchange (XMI), Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/spec/XMI/, 2007.
12. XSL Transformations (XSLT), World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt/, 1999.
13. J. Yong, Internet-based e-learning workow process, Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design II, pp.516-524, 2006.
14. J. M. Dodero, C. Tattersall, D. Burgos and R. Koper, Transformational techniques for model-driven authoring of learning designs, Advances in Web Based Learning, pp.230-241, 2008.
15. N. Shimo, S. Pang, N. Kasabov and T. Yamakawa, Curiosity-driven multi-agent competitive and cooperative LDA learning, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol.4, no.7, pp.1537-1552, 2008.
16. D. Michael and R. Motschnig, coUML-A Visual Language for Modeling Cooperative Environments, Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, Idea Group, 2007.
17. P. Laforcade, B. Zendagui and V. Barré, A domain-specific-modeling approach to support scenariosbased instructional design, Times of Convergence, Technologies Across Learning Contexts, pp.185-196, 2008.
18. IMS Content Packaging Specification, IMS Global Learning Consortium, http://www.imsglobal. org/content/packaging/, 2007.
19. C.-K. Ke, W.-T. Chen and M.-Y. Wu, Adaptive support of e-portfolio knowledge for student ubiquitous learning, ICIC Express Letters, vol.4, no.5(A), pp.1521-1528, 2010.
20. J. M. Almendros-Jiménez and L. Iribarne, An extension of UML for the modeling of WIMP user interfaces, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol.19, no.6, pp.695-720, 2008.
21. P. Laforcade, Visualization of learning scenarios with UML4LD, Journal of Learning Design, vol.2, no.2, pp.31-42, 2001.
22. W. Van der Vegt, O. ONeil, R. Nadolski and R. Koper, Learning Design UML Profile, Open University of Netherlands, http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/657/, 2006.
23. Meta Object Facility (MOF), Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/, 2006.
24. UML Diagram Interchange (UMLDI), Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/spec/UMLDI/, 2006.
25. S. Britain, A Review of Learning Design: Concept, Specifications and Tools, Report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded documents/ReviewLearning Design.doc, 2004.
26. J. R. Hilera, J. Escribano, R. Barchino, J. M. Gutifierrez, S. Otón, J. J. Martínez, J. A. Gutifierrez and L. De Marcos, An IMS-learning design player based on coppercore engine, Proc. of e-Learning 2008, pp.363-370, 2008.
27. P. J. Lara, J. J. Escribano, L. Fernández and J. R. Hilera, A study of the relationship between usability and test cases precedence based on a formal model for activity diagrams, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Research and Practice, pp.462-469, 2005.
28. J. R. Hilera, L. Fernandez-Sanz, J. A. Gutifierrez-De-Mesa, S. Otón, R. Barchino, J. M. Gutifierrez, J. J. Martínez and L. De-Marcos, Reusing and sharing learning designs in a virtual university: A real case, Proc. of ED-MEDIA. AACE, pp.460-465, 2010.
29. X. Ren, X. Zhang and K. Kyo, Quantifying the learning effect in human performance models, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol.4, no.9, pp.2419-2430, 2008.